{"title":"The Fly and the Displaced Self: Affective Potential in the Epiphanic Moments of Mansfield, Woolf and Lawrence","authors":"C. Hindrichs","doi":"10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474439657.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474439657.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"Katherine Mansfield’s claim that she and Elizabeth von Arnim are ‘worms of the same family’ would seem a curious analogy. But this deprecatory trope aligning the writer’s perspective with an insect’s, nonetheless, uses commonly held assumptions to interrogate gendered subjectivity and class dichotomies in the postwar world. In ‘The Fly,’ Mansfield depicts a businessman distracted by the seemingly harmless entertainment of dousing a housefly with ink; his god-like play with the fly evokes an attempt to master trauma – the loss of his son in the war, his consequent lack of purpose, and his complicity. Likewise, Mabel Waring in Virginia Woolf’s ‘The New Dress’ compulsively repeats an image she’s conjured of a fly crossing a saucer as a bulwark against the sense of irrelevance she feels in upper-class society. In Kangaroo, D.H. Lawrence’s writer Richard Somers faces a dark night of the soul trying on and rejecting different ideologies in order to secure a sense of purpose in his work; he sees himself as a fly harrowingly climbing up and continually falling back into a pot of ointment. Each protagonist considers or takes on the point of view of a housefly, attempting to master a trauma that, seen fully, would threaten his or her identity. These scenes should be an affective climax, however, as the deprecating choice of a housefly suggests, they are instead moments not of epiphany or emotional release but of existential impasse.","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128504133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Virginia Woolf’s ‘Moments of Being: “Slater’s Pins Have No Points”’","authors":"Barbara Egel","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0012","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 NOTE: The spoken words, quotation marks and parentheses all come from Woolf’s 1928 text (CSF, pp. 215–20). I thank the Society of Authors, executor for the Literary Estate of Virginia Woolf, for permission to reproduce copyright material. Formal permission must be obtained from the Society of Authors for any performance of this play....","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132720632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Katherine’s Secrets","authors":"Christine Froula","doi":"10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474439657.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474439657.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"When Mansfield offered Woolf ‘scrupulously truthful’ friendship – ‘the freedom of the city without any reserves at all’ – Woolf had already playfully described her as ‘utterly unscrupulous’. Attacking ‘the same job’ of creating a new postwar aesthetics, they shared ‘priceless talk’ about their ‘precious art’ even as their friendship foundered in distance, absence, ‘quicksands’ of insincerity, misunderstandings, secrets, silences – reserves of all sorts. This essay considers this competitive, irreplaceable literary friendship through the veil of Katherine’s secrets, things we see that Virginia evidently couldn’t, or could see only after Mansfield’s death: Mansfield’s 1919 letters about Night and Day; her ‘doubtful’ unsigned 1920 review of it, ‘A Tragic Comedienne’; her 1915 war story, ‘An Indiscreet Journey’, unpublished until after her death, and its resonances with Colette’s war journalism; the open secrets of her posthumously published Doves’ Nest and Journal, which flow into Woolf’s creation of The Waves. Whether Mansfield’s mercurial ‘we’ voices their ‘public of two’, her exclusive alliance with Murry against Bloomsbury, or their postwar generation’s ‘change of heart’, her work, talk, and thought participate in – and even inspire – that ‘thinking in common’ Woolf theorises in A Room of One’s Own and abstracts as ‘the life of anybody’ in The Waves.","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133895014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dangerous Reading in Mansfield’s Stories and Woolf’s ‘The Fisherman and His Wife’","authors":"Brian Richardson","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"The fiction of both Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf contains numerous depictions of characters in the act of reading. In many of these instances, reading is a dubious or even dangerous activity, causing the protagonists to misinterpret the world around them, misapply literary allusions, or draw incorrect and potentially harmful conclusions from their reading. We see this in Mansfield’s stories ‘The Tiredness of Rosabel,’ ‘A Cup of Tea,’ ‘Bliss,’ ‘Marriage à la Mode,’ and ‘The Little Governess’ which depict readers who mistake, misapply, or misconstrue their reading in different ways. Woolf also depicts many dubious acts of reading, one of the most curious being the misogynist fairy tale that Mrs Ramsay reads aloud to her son, James. Noting the problematic aspects of reading in Mansfield can help us model an alternative interpretation of the fairy tale within the novel in line with Woolf’s ironic use of allusion elsewhere in the text.","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115591196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Poetry","authors":"Jackie. Jones","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0013","url":null,"abstract":"Forbidden to touch her hair,\u0000 he touches it.\u0000 Or does he?\u0000 In God’s truth I tell you,\u0000 the back of my hand\u0000 brushed her soft brown curls.\u0000 ‘“Mine beyond words”’.\u0000 Earnest onlookers\u0000 may lean over cases\u0000 coveting her keepsakes.\u0000 ‘I have had my thrill for the night....","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125882786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Conversation Set to Flowers: Beyond the Origins of Kew Gardens","authors":"Karina Jakubowicz","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"The mystery of whether Katherine Mansfield inspired Virginia Woolf's story 'Kew Gardens,' has long been of interest to both Woolf and Mansfield scholars. This article returns to this contested question, but rather than focusing on the issue of attribution, it explores what appears to be a ferment of interest surrounding gardens as a literary theme. It argues that Mansfield, Woolf, and their mutual friend, Ottoline Morrell, were discussing their work with one another during the summer of 1917, and were all choosing to write about gardens during this period. This article asks why these three women were interested in gardens as a subject, and demonstrates the degree to which they were sharing ideas.","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117114523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How too weird","authors":"Maggie Rainey-Smith","doi":"10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474439657.003.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474439657.003.0014","url":null,"abstract":"[Reading Mansfield in Arohata Women’s Prison]\u0000 A pet weta is what\u0000 I remember most\u0000 About Her First Ball\u0000 \u0000 we were locked in\u0000 the library, a small\u0000 reading group\u0000 mixed age, race and\u0000 crimes unknown\u0000 or perhaps withheld\u0000 assuming that fiction\u0000 put us all on an equal...","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129749985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction: Thinking Sideways through One’s Sisters","authors":"Christine Froula","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"‘She’s always there’, sighed someone at the 2017 Katherine Mansfield Conference when Virginia Woolf’s name cropped up yet again, and the audience sighed with her: ‘she’s always there’. Mansfield’s ardent overture of friendship to Woolf launched a relationship of mutual admiration and fascination shot through with misunderstanding, wariness, rivalry and envy. Now ‘curious & thrilling’, now warm, absorbing and intimate; now distant, dormant, secretly dismissive, always competitive, often foundering in ‘quicksands’, their six-year friendship was, for all its ambivalence, uniquely valued by them both for the sake of their ‘precious art’....","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132474877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘Roses blooming under glass; lips cut with a knife’: Hermeneutics of the Modern Female Face in Woolf and Mansfield","authors":"H. Chumak","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"Inspired by the interdisciplinary studies undertaken by Michael North and Rochelle Rives, this article examines conspicuous representations of the modern female face in Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway (1925) and Katherine Mansfield’s ‘Bliss’ (1918), ‘Pictures’ (1920), and ‘The Garden Party’ (1922). If writers and artists of the early twentieth century dispelled facile assumptions about a mimetic relationship between face and character, why are two modernist women writers so invested in highlighting the female face? I approach this query and the lexical visages Mansfield and Woolf craft by situating their work within a cultural-historical framework that constellates nineteenth-century physiognomy, a growing female presence in the public sphere, and the rise of modern visual technologies. Physiognomy had lost its cultural traction by the fin de siècle, but it left an indelible influence on cultural assumptions about women who crossed domestic thresholds. I demonstrate that Woolf and Mansfield convey a salient interest in the inscrutable female visage that resists being read as what Rives calls a ‘text for analysis and interpretation’. Both writers reveal concerns about the modern woman’s visual identification, but of the two, it is Mansfield who fashions corrective images and extricates the modern woman from her physiognomic past.","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115544221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘Which of my many […] hundreds of selves?’ Extending Mansfield’s Posthumous Literary Reception","authors":"Claire Drewery","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439657.003.0016","url":null,"abstract":"Pierce Butler, A Child of the Sun (Mount Desert: Beech Hill, 2016), 184 pp., £11.50. ISBN 9780990820086\u0000 Sandra Jobson, ‘Introduction’, in D. H. Lawrence, The Lost Girl (Strawberry Hills, NSW: Svengali Press, 2016), 496 pp., £22.30. ISBN 9781925416473\u0000 Gerri Kimber, Katherine Mansfield: The Early Years...\u0000","PeriodicalId":284953,"journal":{"name":"Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125438303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}