Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training最新文献_第2页

Teaching software testing: Experiences, lessons learned and the path forward 软件测试教学:经验、教训和前进的道路

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 2011-05-22 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876141

W. E. Wong, A. Bertolino, V. Debroy, A. Mathur, A. Offutt, M. Vouk

引用次数: 16

Can we make software engineering education better by applying learning theories? 我们可以通过应用学习理论来使软件工程教育变得更好吗?

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 2011-05-22 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876157

S. Chimalakonda, K. Nori

引用次数: 1

Panel on the role of graduate software and systems engineering bodies of knowledge in formulating graduate software engineering curricula 研究生软件和系统工程知识体系在制定研究生软件工程课程中的作用小组

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 2011-05-22 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876142

B. Boehm, P. Bourque, D. Gelosh, T. Hilburn, A. Pyster, M. Shaw, J. B. Thompson

引用次数: 1

Is integration of communication and technical instruction across the SE curriculum a viable strategy for improving the real-world communication abilities of software engineering graduates? 在SE课程中整合沟通和技术指导是提高软件工程毕业生在现实世界中的沟通能力的可行策略吗?

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 2011-05-22 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876140

G. Gannod, P. Anderson, J. Burge, Andrew Begel

引用次数: 2

Erase and rewind - Learning by replaying examples 擦除和倒带-通过重放例子来学习

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 2011-05-22 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876154

Lile Hattori, Alberto Bacchelli, Michele Lanza, M. Lungu

引用次数: 1

Smartphones in the curriculum workshop (SMACK 2011) 智能手机在课程研讨会(SMACK 2011)

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 2011-05-22 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876138

Jules White, Jeff Gray, A. Porter

引用次数: 2

Why should they believe us? Determinism, non-determinism and evidence 他们为什么要相信我们?决定论，非决定论和证据

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.41

D. Budgen

{"title":"Why should they believe us? Determinism, non-determinism and evidence","authors":"D. Budgen","doi":"10.1109/CSEET.2006.41","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2006.41","url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. In software engineering, as in computing science, the topics that we teach to our students can be considered as falling into two broad categories: the deterministic, and the non-deterministic. Deterministic topics are those where a specific scenario or operation leads to outcomes that can be assessed in terms of true/false values, and so this classification encompasses large elements of computer architecture, databases, metrics and testing. However, much of the software engineering body of knowledge is really concerned with much more non-deterministic processes such as requirements elicitation, design, construction, maintenance etc. These are activities in which humans play a central role, making value judgements that result in outcomes that are more appropriately assessed by using some form of better/worse ranking than through a true/false categorisation. How much we recognise the existence of this distinction in our teaching is a moot point. Many of our students, educated in the classical science paradigm, will be familiar with the type of reasoning that leads to the outcomes for the deterministic elements. In my presentation, I examine some of the reasons why this experience may not be adequate when they encounter the non-deterministic elements of our subject, and hence why we may need to inculcate some degree of understanding of the evidence-based paradigm in order to support both our teaching and also their learning. I will discuss the nature of this paradigm, present some experiences of how it may be adapted for use in Software Engineering, and review some of the questions that it raises.","PeriodicalId":250569,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117040087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Testing as a Mental Discipline: Practical Methods for Affecting Student Behavior 测验作为一门心理学科:影响学生行为的实用方法

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.35

S. Frezza, M. Tang

引用次数: 0

Educating Students in Value-Based Design and Deve 以价值为本的设计与开发教育学生

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.17

B. Boehm

{"title":"Educating Students in Value-Based Design and Deve","authors":"B. Boehm","doi":"10.1109/CSEET.2006.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2006.17","url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Much of software engineering is taught and practiced in a value-neutral context, in which every requirement, use case, object, test case, and defect is equally important. Too often, students learn that some of their stakeholders' value considerations are more important than others by failing to consider this on the job and suffering the consequences. The recent book, Value-Based Software Engineering (S. Biffl et al., eds., Springer, 2005) sets out the agenda of the value-based software engineering community. It is to integrate value considerations into traditional software engineering principles and practices for use in software engineers' education and daily work. We have been pursuing this agenda in a research project called \"A Value-Based Science of Design\", within the NSF Science of Design program. This paper addresses the nature of \"value\" in a software engineering context; present an initial theory and process for performing value-based software engineering; present example value-based techniques for requirements engineering, design, development, and test; and discuss experiences in incorporating value-based software engineering in individual-assignment and team project courses.","PeriodicalId":250569,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130894989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Tutorial: Intellectual Property Law Basicsc For Software Engineering Educators 教程:软件工程教育者的知识产权法基础

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.37

David G. Kay

引用次数: 0