19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06)最新文献

Software Engineering Instruction and Education Theory: A Dialogue 软件工程教学与教育理论:对话

19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06) Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.32

Patricia A. Basili, V. Basili

{"title":"Software Engineering Instruction and Education Theory: A Dialogue","authors":"Patricia A. Basili, V. Basili","doi":"10.1109/CSEET.2006.32","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2006.32","url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Some software engineering instructors have incorporated projects that either simulate product development for a corporate customer or have students work directly with corporate sponsors to solve a problem or produce an artifact. The rationale for the activity is to provide \"real world\" experience, a foretaste of what a professional in the field will be asked to do. Other instructors may forgo the project as taking too much time from an already full curriculum or due to the difficulty of making and maintaining corporate connections. They rely on the lecture format to convey the material. Are there other reasons for including \"project-type\" activities in software engineering instruction over and above the practical experience they provide? Are there reasons to try to incorporate strategies other than lecture into courses? This paper reviews those areas of educational theory that speak to practical strategies to enhance learning and remembering. Constructivism as a way to view the learning process will be highlighted. Vygotsky's social interaction theory, and scaffolding will be tied to group endeavors. Bloom's hierarchy of the cognitive domain will be viewed in terms of writing course learning outcomes. Also discussed is the importance of the congruence of learning outcomes and modes of assessment to insure learning has occurred and to provide assurances to the Higher Education community that we are doing what we claim to do","PeriodicalId":246045,"journal":{"name":"19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129632864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Visioning a Certification Exam for Graduating Software Engineers 展望毕业软件工程师的认证考试

19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06) Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.39

D. Bagert, M. Lutz

引用次数: 0

Applying Software Development Lifecycles in Teaching Introductory Programming Courses 软件开发生命周期在编程入门课程教学中的应用

19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06) Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.7

S. Rahman, P. Juell

{"title":"Applying Software Development Lifecycles in Teaching Introductory Programming Courses","authors":"S. Rahman, P. Juell","doi":"10.1109/CSEET.2006.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2006.7","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we introduce a new software development method that emphasizes software testing cycles and makes a cultural change in program development. In our approach, students follow the software lifecycles to develop their programs; specifically, a student who is to write a program begins by writing a test suite and completes other development cycles. Students in programming courses usually develop \"toy\" programs that are superficially tested, graded, and eventually discarded. Generally, students are not worried about the quality or maintenance of their products. We believe this style of teaching programming courses leaves students unprepared for developing reliable software. Industry leaders also claimed that more than 50% of a software project's budget was spent on activities related to improving software quality. They stated the reason was the inadequate attention paid to software quality in the development phase. Our approach integrates into the existing programming courses without changing the course contents, syllabus, policies, or loads, and our model improves the students' program quality, in terms of black-box testing. Students indicated that our method helped them in understanding the problems and writing the programs, made the code easier to debug, and improved the students' code reliability and quality","PeriodicalId":246045,"journal":{"name":"19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129764393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Panel: Industrial Impact through Education -- Lessons Learned from Barry Boehm's Contributions to Software Engineering 专题讨论:教育对工业的影响——从Barry Boehm对软件工程的贡献中学到的经验

19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06) Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.27

J. Kontio

引用次数: 1

Rising to the Challenge: Using Business-Oriented Case Studies in Software Engineering Education 迎接挑战:在软件工程教育中使用面向业务的案例研究

19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06) Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.29

J. Burge, D. Troy

引用次数: 14

Students Managing the Software Development Process: A Meta-Level Retrospective Evaluation. 管理软件开发过程的学生:元级回顾评估。

19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06) Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.33

Anne Comer, H. Edwards

引用次数: 2

SimVBSE: Developing a Game for Value-Based Software Engineering SimVBSE:为基于价值的软件工程开发游戏

19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06) Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.31

Apurva Jain, B. Boehm

引用次数: 62

A Germany-Brazil Experience Report on Teaching Software Engineering for Electrical Engineering Undergraduate Students 德国-巴西电气工程本科软件工程教学经验报告

19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06) Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.6

V. Lucena, Alysson Brito, P. Göhner

引用次数: 15

Coaching Professional Software Developers - An Experience Report 指导专业软件开发人员-经验报告

19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06) Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.11

C. Bunse, Ines Grützner, C. Peper, S. Steinbach-Nordmann, Carsten Vollmers

{"title":"Coaching Professional Software Developers - An Experience Report","authors":"C. Bunse, Ines Grützner, C. Peper, S. Steinbach-Nordmann, Carsten Vollmers","doi":"10.1109/CSEET.2006.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2006.11","url":null,"abstract":"Model-driven development, using UML, has become the most dominant development paradigm, in software industry. To be correctly and efficiently applied, systematic teaching and learning are key prerequisites for benefiting from new technologies. This is especially true for an industrial setting since traditional classroom training approaches are often not applicable due to time and cost reasons, which, in turn, led to the development of e-learning and blended learning approaches. Based on numerous applications of our modular blended learning approach for teaching object-oriented software development with UML (Bunse at al., 2005) an attempt has been made to improve the design, the organization and the execution of the blended learning arrangement. Therefore, we collected data on the learning environment, the learners' behavior and preferences. The results from the questioning in an industrial setting, although far from being representative because of the small number of respondents, give some interesting insights in the needs and expectations of learners and the usage of different elements of blended learning arrangements which could serve as hypotheses for later in depth studies. One of these hypotheses is, that coaching may serve very well the explored learning needs and preferences and makes training programs effective and sustainable","PeriodicalId":246045,"journal":{"name":"19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132979786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Eight Years of Delivering Professional Education and Training for Software Engineering at Fraunhofer IESE: An Experience Report 在Fraunhofer IESE提供软件工程专业教育和培训的八年:经验报告

19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06) Pub Date : 2006-04-19 DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2006.18

L. Thomas, P. Waterson, Sonja Trapp

引用次数: 6