软件工程教学与教育理论:对话

Patricia A. Basili, V. Basili
{"title":"软件工程教学与教育理论:对话","authors":"Patricia A. Basili, V. Basili","doi":"10.1109/CSEET.2006.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Some software engineering instructors have incorporated projects that either simulate product development for a corporate customer or have students work directly with corporate sponsors to solve a problem or produce an artifact. The rationale for the activity is to provide \"real world\" experience, a foretaste of what a professional in the field will be asked to do. Other instructors may forgo the project as taking too much time from an already full curriculum or due to the difficulty of making and maintaining corporate connections. They rely on the lecture format to convey the material. Are there other reasons for including \"project-type\" activities in software engineering instruction over and above the practical experience they provide? Are there reasons to try to incorporate strategies other than lecture into courses? This paper reviews those areas of educational theory that speak to practical strategies to enhance learning and remembering. Constructivism as a way to view the learning process will be highlighted. Vygotsky's social interaction theory, and scaffolding will be tied to group endeavors. Bloom's hierarchy of the cognitive domain will be viewed in terms of writing course learning outcomes. Also discussed is the importance of the congruence of learning outcomes and modes of assessment to insure learning has occurred and to provide assurances to the Higher Education community that we are doing what we claim to do","PeriodicalId":246045,"journal":{"name":"19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software Engineering Instruction and Education Theory: A Dialogue\",\"authors\":\"Patricia A. Basili, V. Basili\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSEET.2006.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary form only given. Some software engineering instructors have incorporated projects that either simulate product development for a corporate customer or have students work directly with corporate sponsors to solve a problem or produce an artifact. The rationale for the activity is to provide \\\"real world\\\" experience, a foretaste of what a professional in the field will be asked to do. Other instructors may forgo the project as taking too much time from an already full curriculum or due to the difficulty of making and maintaining corporate connections. They rely on the lecture format to convey the material. Are there other reasons for including \\\"project-type\\\" activities in software engineering instruction over and above the practical experience they provide? Are there reasons to try to incorporate strategies other than lecture into courses? This paper reviews those areas of educational theory that speak to practical strategies to enhance learning and remembering. Constructivism as a way to view the learning process will be highlighted. Vygotsky's social interaction theory, and scaffolding will be tied to group endeavors. Bloom's hierarchy of the cognitive domain will be viewed in terms of writing course learning outcomes. Also discussed is the importance of the congruence of learning outcomes and modes of assessment to insure learning has occurred and to provide assurances to the Higher Education community that we are doing what we claim to do\",\"PeriodicalId\":246045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2006.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2006.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

只提供摘要形式。一些软件工程讲师已经合并了一些项目,这些项目要么为公司客户模拟产品开发,要么让学生直接与公司赞助商一起工作来解决问题或生产工件。该活动的基本原理是提供“真实世界”的经验,预示着该领域的专业人士将被要求做什么。其他教师可能会放弃这个项目,因为在已经很完整的课程中占用了太多的时间,或者因为建立和维持企业关系很困难。他们依靠讲座的形式来传达材料。在软件工程教学中包含“项目类型”活动,而不是它们提供的实际经验,还有其他原因吗?是否有理由尝试在课程中加入讲课以外的策略?本文回顾了教育理论中涉及提高学习和记忆的实用策略的那些领域。建构主义作为一种看待学习过程的方式将被强调。维果茨基的社会互动理论,以及脚手架将与群体努力联系在一起。布鲁姆的认知领域层次将从写作课程学习成果的角度来看待。还讨论了学习成果和评估模式的一致性的重要性,以确保学习已经发生,并向高等教育界提供保证,我们正在做我们声称要做的事情
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Software Engineering Instruction and Education Theory: A Dialogue
Summary form only given. Some software engineering instructors have incorporated projects that either simulate product development for a corporate customer or have students work directly with corporate sponsors to solve a problem or produce an artifact. The rationale for the activity is to provide "real world" experience, a foretaste of what a professional in the field will be asked to do. Other instructors may forgo the project as taking too much time from an already full curriculum or due to the difficulty of making and maintaining corporate connections. They rely on the lecture format to convey the material. Are there other reasons for including "project-type" activities in software engineering instruction over and above the practical experience they provide? Are there reasons to try to incorporate strategies other than lecture into courses? This paper reviews those areas of educational theory that speak to practical strategies to enhance learning and remembering. Constructivism as a way to view the learning process will be highlighted. Vygotsky's social interaction theory, and scaffolding will be tied to group endeavors. Bloom's hierarchy of the cognitive domain will be viewed in terms of writing course learning outcomes. Also discussed is the importance of the congruence of learning outcomes and modes of assessment to insure learning has occurred and to provide assurances to the Higher Education community that we are doing what we claim to do
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信