发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Cochrane Review of Screening Mammography 筛查性乳房x光检查的Cochrane综述
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0006
M. Hochman
{"title":"The Cochrane Review of Screening Mammography","authors":"M. Hochman","doi":"10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in preventive medicine. Is screening mammography effective? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127918087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying Children with Low-Risk Head Injuries Who Do Not Require Computed Tomography 识别不需要计算机断层扫描的低风险头部损伤儿童
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780190204037.003.0042
M. Hochman, Ashaunta T Anderson
{"title":"Identifying Children with Low-Risk Head Injuries Who Do Not Require Computed Tomography","authors":"M. Hochman, Ashaunta T Anderson","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780190204037.003.0042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780190204037.003.0042","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in radiology. Is it possible to develop clinical prediction rules for identifying children at very low risk for clinically important traumatic brain injuries who do not require computed tomography (CT) scans for evaluation? Starting with this question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123605696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mastectomy versus Lumpectomy for Invasive Breast Cancer 浸润性乳腺癌的乳房切除术与乳房肿瘤切除术
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0030
M. Hochman
{"title":"Mastectomy versus Lumpectomy for Invasive Breast Cancer","authors":"M. Hochman","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0030","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in surgery. Do all women with invasive breast cancer require a total mastectomy, or is breast conserving therapy (i.e., lumpectomy) appropriate in some women? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123833689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis 早期透析与晚期透析
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0019
M. Hochman
{"title":"Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis","authors":"M. Hochman","doi":"10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0019","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in internal medicine. Can the initiation of dialysis safely be delayed in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤14.0 mL per minute who do not demonstrate traditional signs or symptoms indicating the need for dialysis? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114459061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Arrhythmia Suppression Following Myocardial Infarction 心肌梗死后心律失常抑制
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0008
M. Hochman
{"title":"Arrhythmia Suppression Following Myocardial Infarction","authors":"M. Hochman","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in internal medicine. Do antiarrhythmic medications—which were widely used to suppress ventricular arrhythmias prior to the publication of CAST—improve survival in patients with recent myocardial infarctions? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115050798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antepartum Glucocorticoids in Premature Labor 产前糖皮质激素在早产中的作用
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0033
M. Hochman
{"title":"Antepartum Glucocorticoids in Premature Labor","authors":"M. Hochman","doi":"10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0033","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in obstetrics. Can respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) be prevented in neonates by administering glucocorticoids to women at risk for premature labor? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116076625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treating Elevated Blood Sugar Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes 治疗2型糖尿病患者的高血糖水平
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0015
M. Hochman
{"title":"Treating Elevated Blood Sugar Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"M. Hochman","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0015","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in internal medicine. Does treating type 2 diabetes with medications to lower the blood sugar reduce diabetes-related complications more than dietary therapy alone? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130357319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perioperative Beta Blockers in Noncardiac Surgery 非心脏手术围手术期β受体阻滞剂
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0025
M. Hochman
{"title":"Perioperative Beta Blockers in Noncardiac Surgery","authors":"M. Hochman","doi":"10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0025","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in surgery. Should patients undergoing noncardiac surgery receive a perioperative beta blocker to prevent cardiovascular complications? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122470272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Cardiac Stents versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Severe Coronary Artery Disease 心脏支架与冠状动脉搭桥手术治疗严重冠状动脉疾病
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0026
M. Hochman
{"title":"Cardiac Stents versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Severe Coronary Artery Disease","authors":"M. Hochman","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780199343560.003.0026","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in surgery. Should patients with severe coronary artery disease (three-vessel and/or left main disease) be treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128802732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Choosing First-Line Therapy for Hypertension 选择高血压的一线治疗
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2013-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0009
M. Hochman
{"title":"Choosing First-Line Therapy for Hypertension","authors":"M. Hochman","doi":"10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199343560.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in internal medicine. What is the preferred first-line medication for the treatment of hypertension: thiazide diuretics or any of the more recently developed blood pressure medications? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131890983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信