发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Cell-Free DNA Analysis for Antenatal Diagnosis 无细胞DNA分析用于产前诊断
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0032
{"title":"Cell-Free DNA Analysis for Antenatal Diagnosis","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0032","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in obstetrics. How does cell-free DNA analysis compare with standard biomarker screening for prenatal diagnosis in women? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117285127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Introduction of Peanuts in Young Children 幼儿早期接触花生
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0039
{"title":"Early Introduction of Peanuts in Young Children","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0039","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark analysis in pediatrics. Does early introduction of peanuts in infants lower the rate of peanut allergy? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122141956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Screening for Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Computed Tomography versus Chest Radiography 低剂量计算机断层扫描与胸片筛查肺癌的比较
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199349937.003.0007
K. White
{"title":"Screening for Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Computed Tomography versus Chest Radiography","authors":"K. White","doi":"10.1093/med/9780199349937.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199349937.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in preventive medicine. Is screening for lung cancer with a low-dose CT scan effective? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123097349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cancer Risk from Pediatric Computed Tomography 儿童计算机断层扫描的癌症风险
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0042
Christoph I. Lee
{"title":"Cancer Risk from Pediatric Computed Tomography","authors":"Christoph I. Lee","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0042","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in radiology. How much radiation do children receive from computed tomography and what is the cancer risk from this radiation exposure? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114638013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Statins for Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention 他汀类药物用于原发性心血管疾病预防
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0011
{"title":"Statins for Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0011","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in internal medicine. Are statins effective among patients without a history of cardiovascular disease? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130652243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Meta-Analysis on the Role of Aspirin in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease 阿司匹林在心血管疾病一级预防作用的meta分析
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0003
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis on the Role of Aspirin in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark meta-analysis in preventive medicine. Is aspirin effective for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy adults? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the analysis, including funding, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124700142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks 39周引产
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0030
{"title":"Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0030","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in obstetrics. What are the pros and cons of labor induction in women at 39 weeks gestation? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116272657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of Stable Coronary Disease 稳定期冠状动脉疾病的管理
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0013
{"title":"Management of Stable Coronary Disease","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0013","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in internal medicine. Should patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) be managed initially with medical therapy versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125989699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke 急性缺血性卒中的血管内治疗
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0045
Matthew D. Kalp, D. Hwang
{"title":"Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke","authors":"Matthew D. Kalp, D. Hwang","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0045","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in neurology. Is intraarterial treatment effective for an acute ischemic stroke? Starting with this question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127064256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV Infection 预防HIV感染的暴露前预防
50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0018
{"title":"Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV Infection","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0018","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in internal medicine. Is pre-exposure prophylaxis effective for preventing the transmission of HIV? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133575549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信