{"title":"稳定期冠状动脉疾病的管理","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in internal medicine. Should patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) be managed initially with medical therapy versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.","PeriodicalId":243490,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Stable Coronary Disease\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in internal medicine. Should patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) be managed initially with medical therapy versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"50 Studies Every Doctor Should Know","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197533642.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter provides a summary of a landmark study in internal medicine. Should patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) be managed initially with medical therapy versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, who was studied, how many patients, study overview, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.