Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon最新文献

{"title":"Pulmonary Endarterectomy: Risk Factors for Early and Late Mortality.","authors":"Sehnaz Olgun Yildizeli, Hüseyin Arikan, Sinem Güngör, Aslı Tufan-Çinçin, Derya Kocakaya, Halil Ataş, Bulent Mutlu, Serpil Gezer Tas, Koray Ak, G Nural Bekiroğlu, Bedrettin Yildizeli","doi":"10.1055/a-2409-5944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2409-5944","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Pulmonary endarterectomy is a potentially curative treatment option for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This study aimed to identify predictors of short- and long-term outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy for CTEPH patients, including age. Methods Patients who underwent surgery between March 2014 and January 2024 were included in the study. Perioperative and follow-up data were retrospectively studied, including age, in-hospital mortality, one- and five-year survival, and the length of intensive care unit and hospital stays after pulmonary endarterectomy. Results In total, 834 consecutive patients (mean age 51±15.3 years) underwent pulmonary endarterectomy and were included in the analysis. The in-hospital mortality rate was 7.8% (n = 65), while overall mortality rates at one and five years were 10.6% and 11.3%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6.7% for patients < 70 years compared to 12.4% for patients ≥70 years (p=0.029). In the multivariate analysis of mortality, age (p=0.007), and length of intensive care unit stay (p= 0.028) emerged as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, while the Charlson Comorbidity Index (p<0.001) and six-minute walk distance (p=0.005) were also significant predictors of one-year survival. Conclusion Despite higher short-term mortality rates, pulmonary endarterectomy was feasible and well tolerated among elderly patients. Despite surgical advancements, careful patient selection remains crucial, particularly in the presence of comorbidities. Significant clinical and hemodynamic improvements were observed, along with favorable long-term survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142133836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Follow-Up and Outcome after Coronary Bypass Surgery Preceded by Coronary Stent Implantation.","authors":"Marwan Hamiko, Nicole Konrad, Doreen Lagemann, Christopher Gestrich, Franz Masseli, Mehmet Oezkur, Markus Velten, Hendrik Treede, Georg Daniel Duerr","doi":"10.1055/a-2107-0481","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2107-0481","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Guidelines on myocardial revascularization define recommendations for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Only little information exists on long-term follow-up and quality of life (QoL) after CABG preceded by PCI. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of prior PCI on outcome and QoL in patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent CABG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> In our retrospective study, CABG patients were divided in: CABG preceded by PCI: PCI-first (PCF), and CABG-only (CO) groups. The PCF group was further divided in guideline-conform (GCO) and guideline nonconform (GNC) subgroups, according to the SYNTAX score (2014 European Society of Cardiology [ESC]/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery [EACTS] guidelines). Thirty days mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and QoL using the European Quality-of-Life-5 Dimensions were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 997 patients were analyzed, of which 784 underwent CABG without (CO), and 213 individuals with prior PCI (PCF). The latter group consisted of 67 patients being treated in accordance (GCO), and 24 in discordance (GNC) to the 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines. Reinfarction (PCF: 3.8% vs. CO: 1.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.024), re-angiography (PCF: 17.6% vs. CO: 9.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.004), and re-PCI (PCF: 10.4% vs. CO: 3.0%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed more frequently in PCF patients. Also, patients reported better health status in the CO compared to PCF group (CO: 72.48 ± 19.31 vs. PCF: 68.20 ± 17.86; <i>p</i> = 0.01). Patients from the guideline nonconform subgroup reported poorer health status compared to the guideline-conform group (GNC: 64.23 ± 14.56 vs. GCO: 73.42 ± 17.66; <i>p</i> = 0.041) and were more likely to require re-PCI (GNC: 18.8% vs. GCO: 2.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.03). Also, GNC patients were more likely to have left main stenosis (GCO: 19.7% vs. GNC: 37.5%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and showed higher preinterventional SYNTAX score (GCO: 18.63 ± 9.81 vs. GNC: 26.67 ± 5.07; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> PCI preceding CABG is associated with poorer outcomes such as reinfarction, re-angiography, and re-PCI, but also worse health status and higher rehospitalization. Nevertheless, results were better when PCI was guideline-conformant. This data should impact the Heart Team decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10259310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reply to Letter to the Editor.","authors":"Yoshiyuki Takami","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1782601","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0044-1782601","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Boilerplates.","authors":"Markus K Heinemann","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788800","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788800","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reply by the Authors of the Original Article.","authors":"Yifei Wang","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1779343","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0044-1779343","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139724096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comment on: \"Continuous Analgesia with Intercostal Catheterization under the Thoracoscopy\".","authors":"Wen-He Yang, Xin-Tao Li, Fu-Shan Xue, Nong He","doi":"10.1055/a-2192-5837","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2192-5837","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41238668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Stripping Massage and Literature Review in Post-Thoracoscopic Chest Pain Management.","authors":"Jiun Hsu, Sheng-Pin Yu, Chien-Te Pan, Pei-Ming Huang","doi":"10.1055/a-2137-9035","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2137-9035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this randomized study was to investigate whether stripping massage (SM) of myofascial trigger points in the lower rhomboid muscle could alleviate chest pain in patients following thoracoscopic surgery. In addition, a literature review was conducted to assess the effectiveness of various pain management techniques. Sixty adult patients who reported a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 4 or higher were randomly assigned to receive conventional analgesics alone (conventional group) or combined with SM twice daily for 2 weeks (SM group). VAS scores and the use of additional analgesics were evaluated on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30. Using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases, a review of current pain management techniques was carried out up to January 31, 2022. A subgroup analysis was also performed to examine the treatment effect during different surgical periods and techniques. Results showed that the SM group had significantly lower VAS scores on postoperative days 3, 7, 14, and 30 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as a shorter hospitalization duration and reduced need for additional analgesics (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The literature review included a total of 20 studies (2,342 cases of chest pain relief after thoracoscopic surgery), which indicated that serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks were commonly used as a perioperative approach to reduce pain and opioid consumption. SM and SAP can both serve as adjuvant treatments for chest pain in patients following thoracoscopic surgery, with SM being a safe and noninvasive pain control option after hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10047116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Is Single LIMA-LAD Bypass Appropriate for OPCAB Training?","authors":"Shiho Naito, Hermann Reichenspurner, Björn Sill","doi":"10.1055/a-2260-5218","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2260-5218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> A significant impact of surgeons' experience on outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) has been recognized through previous large-scale studies. However, a safe, effective, and concrete OPCAB training was yet to be identified. We evaluate a safety of our OPCAB training model with single left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-left anterior descending artery (LAD) as a reasonable first step.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Between January 2010 and June 2019, 180 patients with an isolated single coronary bypass of the LAD using LIMA as an in situ graft via median sternotomy fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Coronary arterial bypass under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), utilizing other graft material, minimal invasive direct coronary arterial bypass through left-sided thoracotomy, and multiple diseased coronary artery disease were excluded. The primary outcome is an early postoperative outcome (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]: myocardial infarction, coronary re-revascularization, stroke, acute renal failure, and all causes of death) between residents in training under supervision (group 1: <i>n</i> = 63) and experienced surgeons (group 2: <i>n</i> = 117). Trainees were already experienced in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Preoperative variables were comparable. There was no significant difference in the rate of MACCEs between the two groups including hospital mortality (<i>p</i> = 1.000), perioperative myocardial infarction (<i>p</i> = 0.246), stroke (<i>p</i> = 0.655), and acute renal failure (<i>p</i> = 0.175).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The early postoperative outcome of off-pump LIMA to the LAD performed by trainees was comparable to those by experienced surgeons. Single LIMA-LAD was safely performed by trainees under supervision without CPB. In order to master OPCAB technique, single LAD bypass might be a reasonable first step to get into touch with the technical characteristics of this special procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139672757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reply to Letter to the Editor.","authors":"Shiho Naito, Hermann Reichenspurner, Björn Sill","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787843","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0044-1787843","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comments on \"Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting\".","authors":"Christos Voucharas, Georgios Tagarakis","doi":"10.1055/a-2267-8640","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2267-8640","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139736250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}