The American Review of Public Administration最新文献_第2页

Mitigating Neighborhood Stigma: Examining Strategies of Relating and Reframing 减轻邻里耻辱感：研究关系和重塑的策略

The American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI: 10.1177/02750740241239052

Alexander Kroll, Aarti Mehta-Kroll, Dominik Vogel

引用次数: 0

Presidential Transitions and Interests Group Participation in the Notice and Comment Process 总统交接与利益集团参与通知和评论程序

The American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI: 10.1177/02750740241245362

Michael Livermore, Vladimir Eidelman, Anastassia Kornilova, Onyi Lam

{"title":"Presidential Transitions and Interests Group Participation in the Notice and Comment Process","authors":"Michael Livermore, Vladimir Eidelman, Anastassia Kornilova, Onyi Lam","doi":"10.1177/02750740241245362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241245362","url":null,"abstract":"Federal administrative agencies are one of the primary policymaking venues in the United States. One of the core features of U.S. administrative practice is the notice-and-comment process in which agencies solicit, collect, and respond to comments from the public before issuing new regulations. In this paper, we develop a model of commenting based on three motivations—litigation preservation; agency persuasion; and expression—and analyze public comments to determine how features of the political environment, and specifically the president in power, affect the pool of commenters. We focus on the 2017 presidential transition, when there was both a change in Presidents and the party in control of the White House. We find that there were greater differences in the pool of commenters between administrations than within administrations and that interest groups tended to participate more when they were more closely associated with the party in power. Our findings support the view that many commenters use the public comment process for persuasive purposes, and not only to preserve litigation opportunities or for purely expressive reasons.","PeriodicalId":22370,"journal":{"name":"The American Review of Public Administration","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140667842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Are Women Commissioners More Compassionate Spenders? Evidence From Florida County Governments 女委员是否更有同情心？来自佛罗里达州县政府的证据

The American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI: 10.1177/02750740241247566

Vernise Estorcien, Can Chen, Apu Deb, Milena Neshkova

引用次数: 0

How Does Homeownership Shape Public Service Coproduction? Evidence from a Public Complaint System in Beijing, China 房屋所有权如何影响公共服务的共同生产？来自中国北京公众投诉系统的证据

The American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI: 10.1177/02750740241247565

Youlang Zhang, Wenzhao Li

引用次数: 0

Judicializing Public Interests: Administrative Performance Under the Shadow of Judicial Review 公共利益司法化：司法审查阴影下的行政绩效

The American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI: 10.1177/02750740241245387

Tianhao Chen, Yu Sheng, Wei Xu, Xiaohong Yu

{"title":"Judicializing Public Interests: Administrative Performance Under the Shadow of Judicial Review","authors":"Tianhao Chen, Yu Sheng, Wei Xu, Xiaohong Yu","doi":"10.1177/02750740241245387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241245387","url":null,"abstract":"Do active judicial reviews bring about better administrative performance? Most scholars argue that active judicial review creates animosity between the judiciary and administration, leading to bad administrative performance. Others advocate that the relationship is not so much hostile as it is constructive. However, the actual impact of and mechanisms enabling such a constructive relationship remain unclear. Employing an analysis of Public Interest Litigation against the Administration ( PILA) in environmental protection cases in China, we present a theory of “bargaining in the shadow of judicial review.” The threat of imminent judicial review forces the administration to negotiate with the prosecutor and enhance its performance in exchange for dropping charges. Additionally, the effect of PILA is stronger in regions with more public environmental concern and weaker in regions where the higher-level public administration pays greater attention to environmental protection. Furthermore, we identify the impact of PILA on local governments’ enforcement efforts and its legitimacy. The present study sheds new light on the long-standing debate on managerialism versus legalism.","PeriodicalId":22370,"journal":{"name":"The American Review of Public Administration","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140564455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Burden of Bad Intentions: Analyzing Politicized Administrative Burdens 恶意的负担：分析政治化的行政负担

The American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1177/02750740241231248

Chad B. Newswander, Matthew R. Miles, Lynita K. Newswander

引用次数: 0

Citizen Satisfaction Research in Public Administration: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda 公共行政中的公民满意度研究：系统文献综述与未来研究议程

The American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI: 10.1177/02750740241237477

Soojin Kim, Eunju Rho, Yu Xuan Joycelyn Teo

{"title":"Citizen Satisfaction Research in Public Administration: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda","authors":"Soojin Kim, Eunju Rho, Yu Xuan Joycelyn Teo","doi":"10.1177/02750740241237477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241237477","url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a systematic review of the 122 studies on citizen satisfaction in the field of public administration. The research aims to identify the current state of knowledge on citizen satisfaction by drawing on existing empirical results and conceptual arguments, highlighting research gaps, and developing a heuristic framework to guide future research. Based on a literature search of 12 major public administration journals, our findings indicate that citizen satisfaction has gained significant academic attention as a performance measure to monitor and assess public service delivery, particularly at the local level. Despite substantial scrutiny in diverse research contexts, quantitative studies still predominate, mainly using secondary survey data in their research. Furthermore, we observed an absence of an agreed-upon definition for citizen satisfaction and an over-emphasis on the expectancy-disconfirmation model to explain the satisfaction process, highlighting the need for scholars to move beyond the performance-expectation dyad. While reviewing a set of environmental, organizational, and individual-level antecedents and outcomes, we noticed few scholars have considered the effects of moderating variables on citizen satisfaction. As such, our paper concludes by identifying a few underexplored research themes that could facilitate knowledge-building regarding citizen satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":22370,"journal":{"name":"The American Review of Public Administration","volume":"97 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140377296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Bureaucracy's Good News: A Quiet Gender Revolution 官僚机构的好消息静悄悄的性别革命

The American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI: 10.1177/02750740241239051

Charles T. Goodsell

引用次数: 0

A Model Minority? Asian-White Differences in Federal Careers 模范少数族裔？亚裔与白人在联邦职业生涯中的差异

The American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI: 10.1177/02750740231219287

Gregory B. Lewis, Esther Han

{"title":"A Model Minority? Asian-White Differences in Federal Careers","authors":"Gregory B. Lewis, Esther Han","doi":"10.1177/02750740231219287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231219287","url":null,"abstract":"The stereotype of Asians as a model minority suggests that they either do not experience discrimination or overcome it through higher education, hard work, and respect for authority. We test that stereotype for Asian Americans in the federal service using both Census data and surveys of federal employees. We examine (1) whether Asians attain the same pay levels and managerial authority as whites; (2) whether differences in education, experience, citizenship, and English ability explain differences in pay and authority; (3) whether those differences vary across Asian sub-groups; and (4) whether Asians are as satisfied with their jobs and the treatment they receive. We find moderate Asian-white pay differences, which varied substantially across national origin groups. Asian-white differences in access to managerial authority, however, are substantial across all national origin groups. Asians’ higher educational attainment and weaker English abilities contributed to differences in pay and authority, but unexplained disparities remained, potentially due to discrimination and/or unmeasured factors. Surprisingly, Asians expressed a stronger belief that the federal service allocates rewards fairly and were more satisfied than whites with their own developmental and advancement opportunities despite those pay and leadership disparities. They were, however, somewhat less satisfied with pay, co-workers, and supervisors.","PeriodicalId":22370,"journal":{"name":"The American Review of Public Administration","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140073717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Disentangling Risk Management and Error Management in the Public Sector: A Theoretical Framework 公共部门风险管理与错误管理的分离：理论框架

The American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/02750740241229996

Emily Rose Tangsgaard, Caroline Fischer

{"title":"Disentangling Risk Management and Error Management in the Public Sector: A Theoretical Framework","authors":"Emily Rose Tangsgaard, Caroline Fischer","doi":"10.1177/02750740241229996","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241229996","url":null,"abstract":"Public organizations have little tolerance when it comes to risks and errors. At the same time, environmental, technological, and demographic changes call for new ways of doing things to improve public sector performance. Achieving this may involve trial and error. Therefore, there is a need to effectively combine risk management and error management practices. However, the concepts tend to be intermingled and confused, which hinders public managers from deliberately exercising one or the other managerial behavior, or productively combining them. The purpose of this article is to theoretically disentangle risk management from error management. We argue that risk management is a prospective leadership behavior, while error management is a retrospective one. In our theoretical framework, we describe both concepts according to their temporal, behavioral, and normative characteristics. Testable propositions are developed regarding the theorized differences between the two concepts and their associated behaviors, and we discuss ways in which the two concepts can be applied in order to advance future research and, ultimately, improve the way public organizations respond to risks and errors.","PeriodicalId":22370,"journal":{"name":"The American Review of Public Administration","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140025167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0