Citizen Satisfaction Research in Public Administration: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

Soojin Kim, Eunju Rho, Yu Xuan Joycelyn Teo
{"title":"Citizen Satisfaction Research in Public Administration: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda","authors":"Soojin Kim, Eunju Rho, Yu Xuan Joycelyn Teo","doi":"10.1177/02750740241237477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a systematic review of the 122 studies on citizen satisfaction in the field of public administration. The research aims to identify the current state of knowledge on citizen satisfaction by drawing on existing empirical results and conceptual arguments, highlighting research gaps, and developing a heuristic framework to guide future research. Based on a literature search of 12 major public administration journals, our findings indicate that citizen satisfaction has gained significant academic attention as a performance measure to monitor and assess public service delivery, particularly at the local level. Despite substantial scrutiny in diverse research contexts, quantitative studies still predominate, mainly using secondary survey data in their research. Furthermore, we observed an absence of an agreed-upon definition for citizen satisfaction and an over-emphasis on the expectancy-disconfirmation model to explain the satisfaction process, highlighting the need for scholars to move beyond the performance-expectation dyad. While reviewing a set of environmental, organizational, and individual-level antecedents and outcomes, we noticed few scholars have considered the effects of moderating variables on citizen satisfaction. As such, our paper concludes by identifying a few underexplored research themes that could facilitate knowledge-building regarding citizen satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":22370,"journal":{"name":"The American Review of Public Administration","volume":"97 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Review of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241237477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a systematic review of the 122 studies on citizen satisfaction in the field of public administration. The research aims to identify the current state of knowledge on citizen satisfaction by drawing on existing empirical results and conceptual arguments, highlighting research gaps, and developing a heuristic framework to guide future research. Based on a literature search of 12 major public administration journals, our findings indicate that citizen satisfaction has gained significant academic attention as a performance measure to monitor and assess public service delivery, particularly at the local level. Despite substantial scrutiny in diverse research contexts, quantitative studies still predominate, mainly using secondary survey data in their research. Furthermore, we observed an absence of an agreed-upon definition for citizen satisfaction and an over-emphasis on the expectancy-disconfirmation model to explain the satisfaction process, highlighting the need for scholars to move beyond the performance-expectation dyad. While reviewing a set of environmental, organizational, and individual-level antecedents and outcomes, we noticed few scholars have considered the effects of moderating variables on citizen satisfaction. As such, our paper concludes by identifying a few underexplored research themes that could facilitate knowledge-building regarding citizen satisfaction.
公共行政中的公民满意度研究:系统文献综述与未来研究议程
本研究对公共行政领域 122 项关于公民满意度的研究进行了系统回顾。研究旨在通过借鉴现有的实证结果和概念论证,确定有关公民满意度的知识现状,突出研究差距,并制定一个启发式框架来指导未来的研究。根据对 12 种主要公共管理期刊的文献检索,我们的研究结果表明,公民满意度作为监测和评估公共服务提供情况的一种绩效衡量标准,已经获得了学术界的极大关注,尤其是在地方层面。尽管在不同的研究背景下进行了大量审查,但定量研究仍占主导地位,主要使用二手调查数据进行研究。此外,我们还注意到,公民满意度缺乏一个公认的定义,而且过分强调用期望--不确认模型来解释满意度过程,这凸显出学者们需要超越绩效--期望二元对立的观点。在回顾一系列环境、组织和个人层面的前因和结果时,我们注意到很少有学者考虑过调节变量对公民满意度的影响。因此,我们在论文的最后指出了几个尚未充分探索的研究主题,这些主题可以促进有关公民满意度的知识积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信