Jian L Yeo, Abhishek Dattani, Aseel Alfuhied, Anna-Marie Marsh, Kelly S Parke, Sarah L Ayton, Lavanya Athithan, Joanna M Bilak, Alastair J Moss, Emer M Brady, J Ranjit Arnold, Prathap Kanagala, Christopher D Steadman, Matthew P M Graham-Brown, Melanie J Davies, Anvesha Singh, Iain B Squire, Leong L Ng, Gaurav S Gulsin, Gerry P McCann
Riaz Hussain, Joseph W Plummer, Abdullah S Bdaiwi, Matthew M Willmering, Elizabeth L Kramer, Laura L Walkup, Zackary I Cleveland
{"title":"Optimizing Xenon 129 Ventilation MRI in Cystic Fibrosis with Spiral Imaging and Flip-Angle Correction.","authors":"Riaz Hussain, Joseph W Plummer, Abdullah S Bdaiwi, Matthew M Willmering, Elizabeth L Kramer, Laura L Walkup, Zackary I Cleveland","doi":"10.1148/ryct.240574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.240574","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To implement and evaluate two-dimensional spiral hyperpolarized xenon 129 (<sup>129</sup>Xe) ventilation MRI with flip-angle (FA) correction, as compared with conventional N4ITK (N4) correction, in healthy individuals and those with cystic fibrosis (CF). Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with mild CF and age-matched healthy control participants underwent <sup>129</sup>Xe ventilation MRI using both rapid spiral (approximately 3 seconds) and conventional Cartesian (approximately 10 seconds) acquisitions. Images were corrected using N4 bias correction, and ventilation defect percentage (VDP) was calculated using median-anchored generalized linear binning (mGLB). Separately, B<sub>1</sub> inhomogeneities in spiral images were FA-corrected and analyzed using mGLB. Gravitational gradients in ventilation were quantified from uncorrected and N4- and FA-corrected images in healthy participants. VDP from N4-corrected (VDP<sub>N4</sub>) and FA-corrected (VDP<sub>FA</sub>) images were compared between participant groups and against reader-segmented VDP (VDP<sub>RS</sub>). Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis. Results The final analysis included 38 participants with CF (mean age, 16 years ± 6 [SD]; 20 female) and 25 healthy controls (mean age, 18 years ± 7; 13 male). Qualitatively, Cartesian and spiral acquisitions produced similar regional ventilation images. There was no evidence of a difference in VDP<sub>N4</sub> between acquisition types (Cartesian = 9.1% ± 8.1; spiral = 9.3% ± 8.7; <i>P</i> = .97) with strong correlation (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.95; <i>P</i> < .001) and no systemic bias (mean difference, -0.2%; 95% CI: 3.6, -3.9). FA correction removed coil-related inhomogeneities while preserving physiologic heterogeneity, including gravitational gradients that were removed by N4 correction (mean slope in healthy participants: FA-corrected = 0.026 <i>S</i><sub>Norm</sub>/cm ± 0.013; N4-corrected = 0.002 <i>S</i><sub>Norm</sub>/cm ± 0.001; <i>P</i> < .001). VDP<sub>N4</sub> and VDP<sub>FA</sub> were strongly correlated with VDP<sub>RS</sub> (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.94 and 0.95, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001 for both). Defect masks from FA-corrected images showed better agreement with reader segmentations compared with N4-corrected image-based defect masks (17% higher Dice score from FA-corrected images; mean Dice score: N4-corrected, 0.41 ± 0.31; FA-corrected, 0.48 ± 0.29; <i>P</i> =.001) and better depicted regional hypo- and hyperventilation. Conclusion Two-dimensional spiral acquisition combined with FA correction and mGLB analysis enabled rapid <sup>129</sup>Xe ventilation MRI, effectively mitigating inhomogeneities while preserving physiologic heterogeneity. This approach provided accurate and efficient quantification of ventilation abnormalities in both healthy individuals and individuals with CF. <b>Keywords:</b> MRI, Pulmonary, Lung, Xe","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"7 5","pages":"e240574"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marjan Firouznia, David Molnar, Carl Edin, Ola Hjelmgren, Carl-Johan Östgren, Peter Lundberg, Markus Henningsson, Göran Bergström, Carl-Johan Carlhäll
{"title":"Head-to-Head Comparison between MRI and CT in the Evaluation of Volume and Quality of Epicardial Adipose Tissue.","authors":"Marjan Firouznia, David Molnar, Carl Edin, Ola Hjelmgren, Carl-Johan Östgren, Peter Lundberg, Markus Henningsson, Göran Bergström, Carl-Johan Carlhäll","doi":"10.1148/ryct.240531","DOIUrl":"10.1148/ryct.240531","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To systematically compare MRI- and CT-based measurements of both the volume and quality of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT). Materials and Methods This prospective study included participants from a subset of the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) who underwent MRI and CT between November 2017 and July 2018. Dixon fat-water separation MR images were manually segmented, and a threshold-based approach based on a fat signal fraction (FSF) map was used to obtain the EAT volume. Within this EAT volume, the mean FSF was quantified as a measure of fat quality. EAT segmentation from CT images was performed using deep learning techniques, and the EAT volume and its mean attenuation were quantified. Correlation between MRI- and CT-based measurements of EAT volume and quality was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results Ninety-two participants (mean age, 59 years ± 5 [SD]; 60 male participants) were included. The intermodality correlation for EAT volume was very strong (<i>r</i> = 0.92, <i>P</i> < .001), with systematically larger values for CT versus MRI (<i>P</i> < .001). There was a strong negative correlation between MRI FSF and CT attenuation (<i>r</i> = -0.72, <i>P</i> < .001). Repeatability analysis for assessment of MRI EAT volume showed good interreader agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.86) and excellent intrareader agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.96). Conclusion Correlation between MRI and CT was very strong for EAT volume and strong for EAT quality. <b>Keywords:</b> Cardiac, Adipose Tissue (Obesity Studies), Epicardial Fat, Heart, Tissue Characterization, Comparative Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Computed Tomography, Fat Signal Fraction, Fat Attenuation Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"7 4","pages":"e240531"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144856178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}