Impact of Deep Learning-based Artificial Intelligence Assistance on Reader Agreement in Coronary CT Angiography Interpretation.

IF 4.2 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Roberto Farì, Marly van Assen, Raymundo Quintana, Philipp von Knebel Doeberitz, Benjamin Böttcher, Guido Ligabue, Alex Rezai, Max Schoebinger, George S K Fung, Carlo N De Cecco
{"title":"Impact of Deep Learning-based Artificial Intelligence Assistance on Reader Agreement in Coronary CT Angiography Interpretation.","authors":"Roberto Farì, Marly van Assen, Raymundo Quintana, Philipp von Knebel Doeberitz, Benjamin Böttcher, Guido Ligabue, Alex Rezai, Max Schoebinger, George S K Fung, Carlo N De Cecco","doi":"10.1148/ryct.240563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To evaluate the impact of a fully automated, multitask deep learning (DL) algorithm on interreader agreement of coronary artery disease (CAD) detection and stenosis classification using coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included CCTA examinations (<i>n</i> = 623 patients) performed for clinical indications on CT systems from multiple vendors between January 2010 and December 2019. An expert reader (reader 1) analyzed all CCTA scans manually and with artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted reading at the lesion, coronary segment, and patient levels using the CAD Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS). The AI algorithm detected, quantified, and classified coronary lesions. Interreader agreement was evaluated using a second expert reader (reader 2), who analyzed a randomly selected subset of 274 patients. CAD-RADS scores from radiologist reports (reader 3) were available for 362 patients. In a subgroup of 30 patients with disagreements, R2 also interpreted the cases using AI assistance. Agreement between readings, with and without AI, was assessed using Spearman correlation, and logistic regression and mixed models evaluated the impact of AI-assisted reading on CAD-RADS classification. Results The final study sample included 11 214 coronary segments analyzed from 623 patients (mean age ± SD, 54.8 years ± 15.7; 341 male). Of these patients, 295 (47.9%) had no CAD (CAD-RADS 0), 213 (33.6%) had low risk of coronary obstruction (CAD-RADS < 3), and 115 (18.5%) had high risk of obstructive disease (CAD-RADS ≥ 3). With AI assistance, reader 1 demonstrated improved agreement with reader 2 (ρ = 0.899-0.949; <i>P</i> < .001) and reader 3 (ρ = 0.889-0.938; <i>P</i> < .001). In the subgroup with reader 1-AI disagreement, agreement between reader 1 and reader 2 was low with manual readings (ρ = 0.688) but increased substantially when both readers used AI-assisted reading (ρ = 0.975; <i>P</i> < .001). Conclusion AI-assisted reading using a DL algorithm significantly improved interreader agreement for CAD-RADS classification at CCTA. <b>Keywords:</b> Applications - CT, CT-Coronary Angiography, Deep Learning <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"7 5","pages":"e240563"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.240563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the impact of a fully automated, multitask deep learning (DL) algorithm on interreader agreement of coronary artery disease (CAD) detection and stenosis classification using coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included CCTA examinations (n = 623 patients) performed for clinical indications on CT systems from multiple vendors between January 2010 and December 2019. An expert reader (reader 1) analyzed all CCTA scans manually and with artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted reading at the lesion, coronary segment, and patient levels using the CAD Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS). The AI algorithm detected, quantified, and classified coronary lesions. Interreader agreement was evaluated using a second expert reader (reader 2), who analyzed a randomly selected subset of 274 patients. CAD-RADS scores from radiologist reports (reader 3) were available for 362 patients. In a subgroup of 30 patients with disagreements, R2 also interpreted the cases using AI assistance. Agreement between readings, with and without AI, was assessed using Spearman correlation, and logistic regression and mixed models evaluated the impact of AI-assisted reading on CAD-RADS classification. Results The final study sample included 11 214 coronary segments analyzed from 623 patients (mean age ± SD, 54.8 years ± 15.7; 341 male). Of these patients, 295 (47.9%) had no CAD (CAD-RADS 0), 213 (33.6%) had low risk of coronary obstruction (CAD-RADS < 3), and 115 (18.5%) had high risk of obstructive disease (CAD-RADS ≥ 3). With AI assistance, reader 1 demonstrated improved agreement with reader 2 (ρ = 0.899-0.949; P < .001) and reader 3 (ρ = 0.889-0.938; P < .001). In the subgroup with reader 1-AI disagreement, agreement between reader 1 and reader 2 was low with manual readings (ρ = 0.688) but increased substantially when both readers used AI-assisted reading (ρ = 0.975; P < .001). Conclusion AI-assisted reading using a DL algorithm significantly improved interreader agreement for CAD-RADS classification at CCTA. Keywords: Applications - CT, CT-Coronary Angiography, Deep Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.

基于深度学习的人工智能辅助对冠状动脉CT血管造影解读中读者一致性的影响。
目的评估全自动、多任务深度学习(DL)算法对冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)冠状动脉疾病(CAD)检测和狭窄分类的解读者一致性的影响。材料和方法本回顾性研究包括2010年1月至2019年12月期间在多家供应商的CT系统上进行临床适应症的CCTA检查(n = 623例患者)。一位专家阅读者(阅读者1)使用CAD报告和数据系统(CAD- rads),在病变、冠状动脉段和患者水平上,通过人工智能(AI)辅助阅读,手动分析了所有CCTA扫描。人工智能算法检测、量化和分类冠状动脉病变。使用第二个专家阅读者(阅读者2)评估解读者之间的一致性,该阅读者分析了随机选择的274例患者。来自放射科医生报告(读者3)的CAD-RADS评分可用于362例患者。在一个由30名意见不一致的患者组成的亚组中,R2也使用人工智能辅助来解释病例。使用Spearman相关性评估有人工智能和没有人工智能的阅读之间的一致性,并使用逻辑回归和混合模型评估人工智能辅助阅读对CAD-RADS分类的影响。结果623例患者(平均年龄±SD, 54.8岁±15.7岁,男性341例)共11 214个冠状动脉段。其中295例(47.9%)无冠心病(CAD- rads 0), 213例(33.6%)冠脉梗阻风险低(CAD- rads < 3), 115例(18.5%)冠脉梗阻风险高(CAD- rads≥3)。在人工智能的帮助下,读者1与读者2 (ρ = 0.899-0.949; P < .001)和读者3 (ρ = 0.889-0.938; P < .001)表现出更好的一致性。在阅读者1- ai不一致的亚组中,阅读者1和阅读者2在人工阅读时一致性较低(ρ = 0.688),但在两名阅读者都使用ai辅助阅读时一致性显著提高(ρ = 0.975; P < .001)。结论使用DL算法的人工智能辅助阅读显著提高了CCTA CAD-RADS分类的解释器一致性。关键词:应用- CT, CT冠状动脉造影术,深度学习本文提供补充材料。©rsna, 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
1.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信