Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique最新文献_第3页

When the BMS adds a new section 当BMS添加新部分时

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/07591063221106200a

S. Duchesne, X. Itçaina

{"title":"When the BMS adds a new section","authors":"S. Duchesne, X. Itçaina","doi":"10.1177/07591063221106200a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063221106200a","url":null,"abstract":"This issue 155 sees the launch of a new section, or category of articles, entitled ‘Micromacro’. This is the seventh section in the journal since it was revived in 2018. The original sections are not thematic. They fit the different types of narratives about the method that we wanted to publish and encourage. We presented them in our first issue (137/138) but they have evolved a little since then. This editorial is an opportunity to revisit them. The ‘Implementation’ section is the basic section, the one that is open to the stories in which our colleagues give a reflexive account of the research they carry out. The strength of these accounts is that they do not propose themselves as models. On the contrary: it is by delivering with precision and sincerity the background of their investigations that our colleagues offer fellow colleagues ideas on different ways of tackling a subject, approaching a field, using a technique, combining several methods, etc. while favouring the diversity and inventiveness of research. This section is accompanied by two others, one more theoretical and epistemological, the other more practical. The first, ‘Models and protocols’, publishes – rarely (four articles so far) – reflective texts on methods, partly detached from a particular research project. The second, ‘Tools and instruments’, reports on the design, testing or improvement of tools made available to the scientific community. From our first issue as BMS editors, we have also inaugurated a section particularly important to us: ‘The method of my thesis’. Open to young PhDs, this one is aimed at recounting what thesis itineraries really are, beyond the forms of rationalisation that the standard formats in scientific journals encouage. This section as it is conceived in BMS instead offers our young colleagues to value the methodological and reflexive work carried out during their thesis. Another specificity of ‘The method of my thesis’: we commit ourselves not to refuse the articles that are proposed to us for this purpose and to assist for as long as necessary the authors in the revision and improvement of their text until publication. To do so, we rely on the reviewers who are willing to play the game and offer young colleagues essentially positive advice and suggestions. We would like to thank them for this. Alongside this section we have designed another for our more experienced colleagues. For this one we ask them to revisit their careers from the perspective of the methods they have used in over the course of their work. We had some difficulty finding a suitable name for this section. Since issue 151 it has been called ‘The design of their work’. We would like to thank Philippe Cibois, Nonna Mayer, Sidney Tarrow, François Dubet, Christine Musselin, André Blais, Erik Neveu and Don Dillman for honouring us with this methodological return.","PeriodicalId":210053,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129244195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Fifty years of survey innovation 五十年的调查创新

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/07591063221088317

D. Dillman

{"title":"Fifty years of survey innovation","authors":"D. Dillman","doi":"10.1177/07591063221088317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063221088317","url":null,"abstract":"While completing my PhD in sociology, I did not anticipate spending most of my academic career researching ways to improve methods for doing sample surveys. At that time, I was dedicated to understanding community organization and how people adopt the use of new technologies. This article describes how becoming a new assistant professor just prior to a university crisis turned my academic interests away from organizational behavior toward more than five decades of research to advance survey methodology in step with technological changes transforming the world. This process also turned upside down my thoughts on how to do research. Increasingly I was inspired by the work of survey designers in government and private sector organizations who needed help with improving their survey designs. These experiences led to the creation of a series of innovations: telephone and mail data collection methods, mixed-mode surveying, tailored design for different survey situations, data collection over the internet, unified construction of questionnaires across survey modes, and understanding the differences between answers given to aurally vs. visually delivered survey questions. This sequence of research efforts led to the development and testing of web-push procedures that are now replacing the use of telephone survey methods throughout the world. Yet frequently and at unexpected times, my education in social organization and technology issues provided much needed guidance for thinking beyond the constraints of current survey methods and the possibilities that new methods could provide.","PeriodicalId":210053,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122406603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Ready for Sagetrack! 准备好Sagetrack!

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/07591063221088313a

S. Duchesne

{"title":"Ready for Sagetrack!","authors":"S. Duchesne","doi":"10.1177/07591063221088313a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063221088313a","url":null,"abstract":"When Viviane Le Hay and I took over from Karl Van Meter as editors of the BMS, the issues were products of craftsmanship – I use this word in a positive sense, that of work carried out from start to finish by a qualified person using proven techniques. The texts were solicited or received by the editorial board, which evaluated them by calling on competent people, often chosen amongst their acquaintances; then the small team worked on the text with the authors and put it into format until it was time to entrust it to the editorial assistant of SAGE for production. First, we transformed the evaluation process of the BMS by aligning it with another model, that of the ‘peer-reviewed journals\"; a more industrial model, insofar as it introduces a division of labour between the editors of the journal and the evaluators, with a so-called double-blind review process: the texts are anonymised and so are the evaluations. At the same time, we have invited colleagues to propose guest issues. To manage the increased complexity of the production process, we had to mobilise, still in an artisanal way – but understood this time in the negative sense of what is done with rudimentary means. That is to say, easily accessible tools, such as a spreadsheet shared in a Google directory, a Dropbox folder and, of course, a Gmail address. The contrast between these makeshift means and the industrial nature of our publisher, SAGE, was obvious. Indeed, there is something of a paradox in claiming a home-grown approach, on the fringes of developments in globalized science, in a journal published by SAGE. The breadth of our publisher’s ‘portfolio’ (which claims more than 1,000 journals) allows us to do as we please. Of course, the time we spend on the BMS is not paid for by the publisher (which however recompenses us once a year), but by our main employer (in this case, the CNRS); in return, SAGE produces and distributes the journal without any expectations in terms of profits or regarding the running of the journal. Recently, however, we have been strongly incentivized to adopt the Sagetrack online submission platform. The question had been put to us back in 2018. When consulted, the editorial board decided against it. Our respective experiences with this type of interface were not very positive and we feared that the formalism of this type of submission would have an effect on the articles proposed to us as well as on the reviewers. It seemed to us that, for a small journal like ours, it remained preferable to send personal messages to potential reviewers in order to obtain their agreements. Four years later, I recognise that a tool like ScholarOne – which SAGE is asking us to adopt – designed to simplify the tracking of the many operations involved in","PeriodicalId":210053,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134481946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Quantifying class trajectories: linking topological and temporal accounts 量化阶级轨迹:连接拓扑和时间账户

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/07591063221088321

M. Toft

引用次数: 1

SPRING 2022 RC33 NEWSLETTER 2022年春季rc33通讯

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/07591063221088318

Karl M. van Meter

引用次数: 0

C’est parti pour Sagetrack! 让我们去Sagetrack吧!

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/07591063221088313

S. Duchesne

引用次数: 0

Traduire l’inégale distribution des revenus et des diplômes : Une évaluation de l’efficacité stratificationniste de la nomenclature des PCS, de l’ESeG et de la grille en classes d’emploi 转化收入和学历的不平等分配:对个人简历、经济社会地位和就业等级网格分类的分层有效性的评估

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Pub Date : 2022-01-24 DOI: 10.1177/07591063211061755

D. Descamps, Agathe Foudi

{"title":"Traduire l’inégale distribution des revenus et des diplômes : Une évaluation de l’efficacité stratificationniste de la nomenclature des PCS, de l’ESeG et de la grille en classes d’emploi","authors":"D. Descamps, Agathe Foudi","doi":"10.1177/07591063211061755","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063211061755","url":null,"abstract":"Les nomenclatures professionnelles comptent parmi les principaux outils d’objectivation de la structure d’une société et sont parfois mobilisées pour appréhender les inégalités en son sein. L’enjeu de cet article est de proposer une série d’instruments visant à apprécier leur capacité à rendre compte de l’inégale distribution des ressources entre groupes sociaux. Pour cela, nous nous focalisons sur l’étude de trois nomenclatures : la PCS-2003 (Professions et Catégories Socioprofessionnelles) ainsi que la grille en classes d’emploi de l’INSEE, et la classification européenne ESeG. Après avoir rappelé leurs principes et objectifs, nous présentons les méthodes par lesquelles s’opère habituellement l’évaluation de la qualité des nomenclatures professionnelles et montrons qu’elles ne visent pas à saisir leur pouvoir d’objectivation de la stratification sociale. En nous basant sur les instruments traditionnels d’analyse des inégalités que sont les fractiles, nous proposons alors deux séries d’outils destinés à mesurer l’efficacité des classifications professionnelles à refléter la pente, la forme et l’étendue des inégalités qui traversent une population. Munis de ces outils et des données de l’enquête Emploi 2017, nous montrons qu’au niveau agrégé des nomenclatures étudiées, c’est la grille en 4 classes d’emploi qui parvient le mieux à restituer l’inégale distribution des revenus et des diplômes entre groupes de populations tandis qu’au niveau détaillé, c’est plutôt la PCS. Nous terminons en avançant quelques propositions de recomposition de certaines catégories de la PCS et de la grille en classes d’emploi afin d’améliorer leur efficacité stratificationniste au niveau détaillé.","PeriodicalId":210053,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132065465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

L’écriture inclusive, une histoire en train de se faire 包容性写作，一个正在形成的故事

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/07591063211061758

引用次数: 0

Corrigendum to ‘Mesurer l'influence ? Une méthode de quantification des activités politiques des entreprises du secteur agroalimentaire en France’ 测量影响的更正?法国农业食品部门企业政治活动的量化方法

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/07591063221076503

引用次数: 0

Investigating gender in a world of gender consciousness 在性别意识的世界里调查性别

Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/07591063211061759

A. Jaunait

{"title":"Investigating gender in a world of gender consciousness","authors":"A. Jaunait","doi":"10.1177/07591063211061759","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063211061759","url":null,"abstract":"For better or worse, it has become difficult to conduct research in the social sciences without encountering gender, even well beyond fields that specifically focus on it. Since the advent of gender studies as a discipline, the concept has gained momentum both as a social fact and structure of social action, and as the analytic category through which these are conceptualised. This special issue of the BMS is embedded in the idea that the analysis of gender itself is indissociable from the history of the concept, and that the increasing spread of this notion throughout society has an impact on the way(s) gender is investigated. In the space of just a few decades the world has evolved from one in which researchers were working to give consistency to a nameless force, to one which is now gender conscious, where gender is mobilised, criticised, claimed, resisted, and debated. In a gender conscious world, the rules of research are changing. The notion of gender consciousness that is proposed here borrows carefully from research in the sociology of law developed under the name legal consciousness studies (LCS). The fact that there are different definitions of gender that compete with each other does not prevent us from considering that there is gender, and we may even consider that the proliferation of definitions participates in the stability of the social phenomenon we are studying, just as, for the theorists of LCS, the multiple representations of the law contribute to its hegemony. One of the central issues here is the problematization of the dialectic between categories of practice and categories of analysis, with a focus on the methodological and epistemological questions of these studies. This ‘return to the field’ will provide answers to these questions, beginning with a personal summary overview of what feminist epistemologies (I) and feminist methodologies (II) have contributed to social sciences, before moving on to contemporary research questions that emerge through the prism of gender consciousness (III).","PeriodicalId":210053,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131940228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1