{"title":"Can I trust this paper?","authors":"Andrey Anikin","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02740-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02740-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After a decade of data falsification scandals and replication failures in psychology and related empirical disciplines, there are urgent calls for open science and structural reform in the publishing industry. In the meantime, however, researchers need to learn how to recognize tell-tale signs of methodological and conceptual shortcomings that make a published claim suspect. I review four key problems and propose simple ways to detect them. First, the study may be fake; if in doubt, inspect the authors' and journal's profiles and request to see the raw data to check for inconsistencies. Second, there may be too little data; low precision of effect sizes is a clear warning sign of this. Third, the data may not be analyzed correctly; excessive flexibility in data analysis can be deduced from signs of data dredging and convoluted post hoc theorizing in the text, while violations of model assumptions can be detected by examining plots of observed data and model predictions. Fourth, the conclusions may not be justified by the data; common issues are inappropriate acceptance of the null hypothesis, biased meta-analyses, over-generalization over unmodeled variance, hidden confounds, and unspecific theoretical predictions. The main takeaways are to verify that the methodology is robust and to distinguish between what the actual results are and what the authors claim these results mean when citing empirical work. Critical evaluation of published evidence is an essential skill to develop as it can prevent researchers from pursuing unproductive avenues and ensure better trustworthiness of science as a whole.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144650265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Francisco Garre-Frutos, Juan Lupiáñez, Miguel A Vadillo
{"title":"Value-modulated attentional capture depends on awareness.","authors":"Francisco Garre-Frutos, Juan Lupiáñez, Miguel A Vadillo","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02734-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02734-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Value-modulated attentional capture (VMAC) refers to a process by which a priori neutral stimuli gain attentional priority when associated with reward, independently of goal or stimulus-driven attentional control. Although VMAC is considered an automatic and implicit process, the role of awareness of the stimulus-reward contingency on its learning process remains unclear at best. In a well-powered replication of a previous study, we found that VMAC is absent when participants are not explicitly informed about the stimulus-reward contingency in the pre-task instructions. In a second experiment, we show that when instructions are manipulated between groups, only the instructed group shows VMAC. Interestingly, although the no-instruction group did not show VMAC at the group level, participants who became aware of the stimulus-reward contingencies did nevertheless show robust VMAC at the end of the task. Meta-analytic evidence further supports our conclusion by showing that studies that include instructions about the stimulus-reward contingencies yield significantly larger VMAC effects. Taken collectively, these findings suggest that the learning process behind VMAC may not be entirely implicit.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144650266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alodie Rey-Mermet, Henrik Singmann, Klaus Oberauer
{"title":"Neither measurement error nor speed-accuracy trade-offs explain the difficulty of establishing attentional control as a psychometric construct: Evidence from a latent-variable analysis using diffusion modeling.","authors":"Alodie Rey-Mermet, Henrik Singmann, Klaus Oberauer","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02696-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02696-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attentional control refers to the ability to maintain and implement a goal and goal-relevant information when facing distraction. Previous research has failed to substantiate strong evidence for a psychometric construct of attentional control. This could result from two methodological shortcomings: (a) the neglect of individual differences in speed-accuracy trade-offs when only speed or accuracy is used as dependent variable, and (b) the difficulty of isolating attentional control from measurement error. To overcome both issues, we combined hierarchical Bayesian Wiener diffusion modeling with structural equation modeling. We reanalyzed six datasets that included data from three to eight attentional-control tasks, and data from young and older adults. Overall, the results showed that measures of attentional control failed to correlate with each other and failed to load on a latent variable. Therefore, limiting the impact of differences in speed-accuracy trade-offs and of measurement error does not solve the difficulty of establishing attentional control as a psychometric construct. These findings strengthen the case against a psychometric construct of attentional control.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144637809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From the eye to the world: Spatial suppression is primarily coded in retinotopic coordinates but can be learned in spatiotopic coordinates.","authors":"Seah Chang, Julie D Golomb","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02732-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02732-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attention is multifaceted, with evidence for distinct mechanisms of attentional facilitation and suppression processes. Interestingly, much less is known about the spatial coordinate system of suppression compared to that of facilitation. The present study examined the coordinate system of spatial suppression by manipulating gaze position and distractor regularities, asking whether suppression is coded in retinotopic (eye-centered) and/or spatiotopic (world-centered) coordinates, and if this varies with more ecological and dynamic contexts. In the current study, we demonstrate that learned spatial suppression primarily transfers across gaze position in retinotopic coordinates; however, in more dynamic contexts favoring spatiotopic information, spatial suppression can be learned in spatiotopic coordinates. These results suggest that the default coordinate system of spatial suppression is retinotopic under static contexts, but suppression can be rapidly learned in spatiotopic coordinates when a spatiotopic representation is beneficial in more naturalistic dynamic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144601299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sebastiano Cinetto, Elvio Blini, Andrea Zangrossi, Maurizio Corbetta, Marco Zorzi
{"title":"Spatial regularities in a closed-loop audiovisual search task bias subsequent free-viewing behavior.","authors":"Sebastiano Cinetto, Elvio Blini, Andrea Zangrossi, Maurizio Corbetta, Marco Zorzi","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02703-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02703-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statistical learning of spatial regularities during visual search leads to prioritization of target-rich locations. The resulting attentional bias may subsequently affect orienting and search behavior in similar tasks but its transfer to free viewing has not been demonstrated. We exploited a novel closed-loop paradigm where human observers searched for invisible target locations on a screen only guided by real-time auditory feedback conveying gaze-target distance. Unbeknownst to participants, location probability was biased towards one hemifield. Free viewing during rest, free image viewing, and spatial judgments were assessed before and after the search task. Search performance systematically improved and peaked in the biased hemifield, showing the unfolding of statistical learning. Importantly, the spatial bias transferred to both free-viewing conditions in terms of mean horizontal fixation position, while it did not transfer to spatial judgments. Exploratory results suggest that search performance was influenced by participants' viewing pattern, whereas transfer was modulated by pre-existing (natural) spatial biases. Our results demonstrate that task-based statistical learning transfers to ecological scenarios, paving the way for future research and clinical applications aimed at ameliorating pathological spatial biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144576141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Probabilities of conditionals: The relevance effect might be confounded by the existence of boundary cases.","authors":"Likan Zhan, Meng Wang","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02725-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02725-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relevance between antecedent and consequent has recently been regarded as essential in modulating the probability assigned to a conditional in natural language. The empirical results are mixed. Positive evidence mainly comes from intensional probability studies about ordinary, unique events. Extensional probability studies about novel abstract events commonly fail to observe such an effect. In extensional probability studies, a set of events is typically provided to sustain participants' judgments. Depending on whether the antecedent and the consequent are true or false, the set can be divided into four subsets. When one or more subsets are empty, the set is called a boundary case. When the number of events becomes smaller, it becomes easier for boundary cases to occur. In previous extensional probability studies, however, boundary cases were normally not included in the test stimuli. In intensional probability studies, no explicit events are provided; participants have to mentally simulate a set of events from their own background knowledge to help them make judgments. The size of the mentally simulated sample is relatively small, especially when the judged statements are complex, like conditionals. It is then highly probable for the intensional probability studies to contain boundary cases, even though they cannot be directly observed. Based on the previous analyses, we suspect that the difference observed in previous studies might be confounded by the fact that boundary cases were included in the former case but not in the latter. To test this possibility, we introduced boundary cases into our experiment involving abstract multiple events and observed that (1) when boundary cases were included in the analyses, modulation effect was observed for three of the four parameters; (2) when boundary cases were excluded from analyses, no modulation effect was observed. Reanalyses of previous intensional studies corroborated our hypothesis. We also discussed the potential reason why relevance effect and boundary cases cooccur.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144584659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Super rapid learning of new attentional sets.","authors":"Seth A Marx, Sisi Wang, Geoffrey F Woodman","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02728-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02728-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans guide attention to different targets as they navigate (e.g., going from a school zone to a construction zone while driving). To understand how observers shift focus between different sets of targets when the context shifts, we had observers perform a new visual search paradigm where target shapes are presented in multiple possible colors with distinct probabilities (e.g., 33%, 26%, 19%, 12%, and 10% baseline colors), such that some target colors are more task-relevant than others. Participants learned to prioritize the target colors that appeared with the target shape most often. We then scrambled the color-probability mapping to assess how quickly people could relearn a new set of target probabilities. Participants relearned these new colors significantly faster than their first set of colors, especially when there was less conflict between the new and old attentional sets. Our findings suggest that memory-guided attention is rapidly and continuously relearning to update task-relevant probabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144584660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Memory for language and modality in bilinguals: Dependencies and frequency effects.","authors":"Wendy S Francis, Paola A Baca","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02724-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02724-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigated how hierarchically related word features, such as language and modality, are encoded in episodic memory. Spanish-English bilingual participants (N = 96) studied a randomly intermixed sequence of English and Spanish words presented visually or auditorily. Picture cues were used to test memory for the language and modality of the original presentation. Bilinguals remembered language more accurately than modality. Memory for both features was more accurate for low-frequency than high-frequency words. However, language proficiency did not correlate with performance. Memory for language and modality were associated at the item level, with a stronger association for low- than high-frequency words. However, modality discrimination was above chance even when language responses were incorrect, showing that access to modality information in episodic memory does not require access to language information. Memory traces for these two features are separately linked to word-encoding episodes, but both depend on item-encoding strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144560884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jiaqi Huang, Gunnar Epping, Jennifer S Trueblood, James M Yearsley, Jerome R Busemeyer, Emmanuel M Pothos
{"title":"An overview of the quantum cognition research program.","authors":"Jiaqi Huang, Gunnar Epping, Jennifer S Trueblood, James M Yearsley, Jerome R Busemeyer, Emmanuel M Pothos","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02675-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02675-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quantum cognition research program concerns the application of quantum probability theory (the rules for how to assign probabilities to events from quantum mechanics, without the physics) to cognitive modeling. We review quantum cognitive models in several areas of psychology, including conjunction/disjunction fallacies in probabilistic judgment, conceptual combinations, similarity, order effects on judgments, causal inference, the disjunction effect in decision making, measurement, and interference effects on judgments and decisions, memory, perception, and other judgment and decision-making applications. For each area, we first present the empirical findings that have motivated the application of quantum models, emphasizing any characteristics which are particularly puzzling or have resisted coherent theoretical explanations previously; we then discuss the quantum cognitive models, noting the key features of the models that help explain the empirical data; we finally cast a critical eye on the models and explore comparisons with non-quantum models.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144554320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Co-activation of phonological and orthographic codes in various modalities of language processing: A systematic and meta-analytic review.","authors":"Xiaohui Cui, Markus F Damian, Qingqing Qu","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02718-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02718-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A vast amount of research has been dedicated to clarifying whether spoken word processing (listening) or production (speaking) is constrained by orthographic codes, and whether written word processing (reading) or production (writing) is constrained by phonological codes. Little work has explored what factors might modulate such cross-modality effects. In this paper, we first provided a comprehensive review of existing evidence, then conducted four meta-analyses to determine the size of cross-modality effects, and we explored potential factors that might modulate these effects. We identified robust orthographic effects on spoken word recognition (k = 93, corrected d = 0.61) and production (k = 34, corrected d = 0.44), and robust phonological effects on written word recognition (k = 178, corrected d = 0.49) and production (k = 28, corrected d = 0.35). Moderator analyses indicated that cross-modality effects may be modulated by the tasks used and by language nativeness of participants. These results shed light on our understanding of language processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144560883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}