Open Heart最新文献

{"title":"Impact of porcelain aorta on outcomes in transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with balloon-expandable valves.","authors":"Philipp Lauten, Julian Kreutz, Lisa C Costello-Boerrigter, Mathias Schreiber, Guido Boerrigter, Christian Albert, Mohammad El Garhy, Björn Göbel, Bernhard Schieffer, Harald Lapp, Tamer Owais, Thomas Kuntze, Birgit Markus","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003069","DOIUrl":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for patients with aortic stenosis and porcelain aorta (PA). Neurological outcomes of patients with PA undergoing TAVI with modern valves require clarification as most trials examined balloon-expandable valves (BEV) and self-expandable valves in intermediate or high-risk patients, but not specifically in patients with PA. Our aim was to compare outcomes, including stroke and mortality, in well-matched patients with and without PA who received BEV during transfemoral TAVI procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing TAVI were entered into a registry. For this single-centre (Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Germany), retrospective analysis, we only selected patients who received BEV. PA diagnosis was made when non-contrast axial CT images fulfilled Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria for PA. There was 2:1 nearest neighbour matching of patients without and with PA. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality or stroke within 72 hours. Secondary outcome measures were 30-day mortality, stroke within 72 hours, technical success and 30-day device success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching patients with (n=141) and without PA (n=282), the primary outcome of mortality at <30 days or stroke within 72 hours was higher in PA versus non-PA (7.8% vs 2.5%; OR 3.32 (95% CI 1.25 to 8.85); p=0.019). With regard to secondary outcomes, PA was not associated with mortality at 30 days (4.3% vs 2.1%; OR 2.04 (95% CI 0.65 to 6.48); p=0.23); however, stroke within 72 hours was significantly higher in PA versus non-PA (3.5% vs 0.4%; OR 10.33 (95% CI 1.17 to 91.12); p=0.017). Technical and device success were uninfluenced by PA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transfemoral TAVI with BEV in patients with PA was associated with a higher risk of the primary combined endpoint of mortality at 30 days or stroke within 72 hours, which was primarily driven by stroke within 72 hours. These findings might influence cerebral embolic protection device use in patients with PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784204/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143067225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sacubitril/valsartan is associated with improvements in quality of life in adult congenital heart disease patients with systemic right ventricular failure.","authors":"Ralph M L Neijenhuis, Marieke Nederend, Anna E van Groningen, Monique R M Jongbloed, Hubert W Vliegen, J Wouter Jukema, Philippine Kiès, Anastasia D Egorova","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003009","DOIUrl":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short-term improvements in quality of life (QOL) have been reported in adult congenital heart disease patients with systemic right ventricle (sRV) failure after treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. This study aimed to evaluate the medium-term QOL changes in sRV failure patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre, prospective cohort study, patients with symptomatic sRV failure completed the Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research/Academic Hospital Leiden Questionnaire for Adult's Health-Related Quality of Life (TAAQOL) at baseline and after starting treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. The TAAQOL was taken at structured outpatient follow-up moments after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment. Linear mixed effects models were used to evaluate the medium-term changes in 12 QOL domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 40 sRV failure patients initiated on sacubitril/valsartan, 35 completed the titration phase, and 31 filled in a total of 98 TAAQOL questionnaires (response rate 77.5%). Significant improvements in gross motoric functioning (p=0.008), cognitive function (p=0.002), sleep (p=0.041), social functioning (p<0.001) and daily activities (p=0.001) were observed during follow-up. No significant changes were observed in fine motoric functioning, pain, sexuality, vitality, positive, depressive or aggressive emotions. Of interest, periods with restrictions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly influence changes over time in any of the 12 QOL domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan treatment was associated with persistent medium-term QOL improvements in gross motoric functioning, cognitive function, sleep, social functioning and daily activities domains in sRV failure patients. Self-perceived QOL of sRV failure patients may be amenable to improvement with sacubitril/valsartan.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784156/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143067227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Complex high-risk indicated PCI (CHIP-PCI): is it safe to let fellows-in-training perform it as primary operators?","authors":"Majd B Protty, Saad Hasan, Diluka Premawardhana, Mohammed Shugaa Addin, Holly Morgan, Shantu Bundhoo, Hussain Hussain, Zia Ul-Haq, Alexander Chase, David Hildick-Smith, Anirban Choudhury, Tim Kinnaird, Ahmed Hailan","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003131","DOIUrl":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Training in complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) has frequently been reserved for established operators (consultants/attending) with trainees (fellows-in-training or FIT) being often discouraged from carrying out such procedures as a primary operator due to their high-risk nature. Whether the outcomes of these cases differ if the primary operator is a supervised FIT compared with a consultant is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using multicentre PCI data from three cardiac centres in South Wales, UK (2018-2022), we identified 2295 CHIP-PCI cases with a UK-BCIS CHIP Score of 3 or more. These were then divided by primary operator status (supervised FIT vs consultant); the primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (IH-MACCE). Multivariate logistic models were developed to adjust for differences in baseline and procedural characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary operator in 838 (36%) of the PCIs was a supervised FIT. Baseline and procedural characteristics had lower complexity in CHIP-PCI cases carried out by supervised FIT vs consultant. In a multivariate-adjusted model, supervised FIT procedures were associated with lower odds of concurrent valve disease (OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.69), dual access (OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.83), cutting/scoring balloons (OR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.79) and rotational atherectomy (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.87). After adjusting for all variables, however, there was no difference in the primary outcome (OR 0.72, 95% 0.34 to 1.51) or any secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analyses restricted to patients with higher CHIP Scores (4+ and 5+) showed comparable IH-MACCE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Training FIT as primary operators in CHIP-PCI appears to be feasible and safe and can be delivered within the standard training programme. The comparable outcomes are likely driven by the two-operator 'buddy' effect that a FIT supervised by a consultant benefits from.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784205/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143067213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Parsimonious versus extensive bleeding score: can we simplify risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention and reduce bleeding events by de-escalation of the antiplatelet strategy?","authors":"Eva Christine Ida Woelders, Yoshinobu Onuma, Kai Ninomiya, Neil O'Leary, Peter Damman, Denise Adriana Maria Peeters, Arnoud Willem Johannes van 't Hof, Marco Valgimigli, Pascal Vranckx, Stephan Windecker, Patrick Washington J C Serruys, Robert-Jan Matthijs van Geuns","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003083","DOIUrl":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Due to the multitude of risk factors outlined in the guidelines, personalised dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) guidance after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is complex. A simplified method was created to facilitate the use of risk stratification. We aimed to compare the predictive and prognostic value of the 'Zuidoost Nederland Hart Registratie' (ZON-HR) classification for bleeding risk with the PREdicting bleeding Complications In patients undergoing Stent implantation and subsEquent DAPT (PRECISE-DAPT) score and to determine the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus DAPT in patients with or without high bleeding risk (HBR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post hoc analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial was performed to compare the predictive value of the ZON-HR classification with the PRECISE-DAPT score. Also, the outcomes stratified by either method were compared and the interaction of HBR on the treatment effect was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The required parameters for the ZON-HR classification (3.7% HBR) and PRECISE-DAPT score (16.6% HBR) were available in 99.9% and 93% of the patients, respectively. The ZON-HR classification had a lower sensitivity (0.09 vs 0.26) and a higher specificity (0.97 vs 0.84), positive predictive value (0.13 vs 0.08) and accuracy (0.92 vs 0.82). Regression analysis showed that both methods predicted hazard for bleeding risk with HRs of 1.87 (95% CI: 1.59 to 2.18) and 2.67 (95% CI: 2.10 to 3.41) for the PRECISE-DAPT score and ZON-HR classification, respectively. The omission of aspirin reduced bleeding events only in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients without HBR (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.90, p value for interaction of HBR: 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stratification for bleeding risk according to the ZON-HR classification was feasible in almost all patients and showed to be more conservative than the PRECISE-DAPT score with a consistent prognostic accuracy. The benefit of aspirin omission was the largest in ACS patients without HBR.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT01813435.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781092/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143059894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ischaemia-reperfusion time differences in ST-elevation myocardial infarction in very young patients: a cohort study.","authors":"Pablo Juan-Salvadores, Luis Mariano De La Torre Fonseca, Beatriz Calderon-Cruz, Cesar Veiga, Samuel Pintos-Rodríguez, Saleta Fernandez Barbeira, Victor Alfonso Jimenez Diaz, Andres Iñiguez Romo","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002957","DOIUrl":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002957","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is one of the most prevalent presentations in young patients. It is essential to emphasise that each minute of delay in providing medical care is negatively correlated to the patient's prognosis. The present study was carried out to evaluate the ischaemia-reperfusion times in patients ≤40 years of age versus individuals >40 years of age and their association with mortality and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) over the long term.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, multicentre cohort study was carried out in 6799 patients diagnosed with STEMI. Two groups were established: patients diagnosed with STEMI and aged >40 years, and patients diagnosed with STEMI and aged ≤40 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients in the young group had a significantly sooner electrocardiographic diagnosis than the patients >40 years of age. A delay was observed in females, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.21 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.30) (p<0.001). Presenting dyspnoea (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.06) (p<0.001) or going to a hospital without haemodynamics (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.67) (p<0.001) was related to increased delay. The occurrence of MACE in the first year of follow-up was related to different risk factors, along with a delay in healthcare (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.54) (p<0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that young patients with STEMI tend to receive a sooner diagnosis than older individuals. Delays in healthcare represent one of the main factors related to the occurrence of MACE and non-event-free survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784106/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143059893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Temporal order of atrial fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction and associated prognosis in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort.","authors":"Tanja Charlotte Frederiksen, Morten Krogh Christiansen, Emelia J Benjamin, Anja Olsen, Henrik Kjærulf Jensen, Christina C Dahm","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003132","DOIUrl":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) share risk factors and are bidirectionally associated. Several studies found higher risks of outcomes in individuals with both conditions. Whether the risks of outcomes differ according to temporal order of AF and AMI is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was based on the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort. We assessed the risk of heart failure (HF), ischaemic stroke (IS) and all-cause mortality during 10 years of follow-up in participants with both AF and AMI compared with only one and according to the temporal order of AF and AMI in participants with both conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5816 participants with newly diagnosed AF only, 3448 with first AMI only, 348 with AF before AMI and 721 participants with AMI before AF. The multivariable-adjusted risks of HF, IS and all-cause mortality were higher among participants with both AF and AMI compared with participants with only AF or AMI. In participants with both, there was no difference in risk of HF (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.17) or IS (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.66) between participants with AF before AMI compared with AMI before AF. AMI before AF was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with AF before AMI (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risks of adverse outcomes were higher among participants with both AF and AMI compared with only AF or AMI. All-cause mortality, but not risk of HF or IS, differed according to temporal order with a lower mortality among participants with AMI before AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759883/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143024074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Machine-learning versus traditional methods for prediction of all-cause mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ammar Zaka, Cecil Mustafiz, Daud Mutahar, Shreyans Sinhal, James Gorcilov, Benjamin Muston, Shaun Evans, Aashray Gupta, Brandon Stretton, Joshua Kovoor, Naim Mridha, Gopal Sivagangabalan, Aravinda Thiagalingam, Fabio Ramponi, Justin Chan, Jayme Bennetts, Dale J Murdoch, Sarah Zaman, Clara K Chow, Rohan Jayasinghe, Pramesh Kovoor, Stephen Bacchi","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002779","DOIUrl":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002779","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate mortality prediction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is essential for mitigating risk, shared decision-making and periprocedural planning. Surgical risk models have demonstrated modest discriminative value for patients undergoing TAVI and are typically poorly calibrated, with incremental improvements seen in TAVI-specific models. Machine learning (ML) models offer an alternative risk stratification that may offer improved predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched until 16 December 2023 for studies comparing ML models with traditional statistical methods for event prediction after TAVI. The primary outcome was comparative discrimination measured by C-statistics with 95% CIs between ML models and traditional methods in estimating the risk of all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included (29 608 patients). The summary C-statistic of the top performing ML models was 0.79 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.86), compared with traditional methods 0.68 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.76). The difference in C-statistic between all ML models and traditional methods was 0.11 (p<0.00001). Of the nine studies, two studies provided externally validated models and three studies reported calibration. Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool tool demonstrated high risk of bias for all studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML models outperformed traditional risk scores in the discrimination of all-cause mortality following TAVI. While integration of ML algorithms into electronic healthcare systems may improve periprocedural risk stratification, immediate implementation in the clinical setting remains uncertain. Further research is required to overcome methodological and validation limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784135/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143024141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Artificial intelligence-based, non-invasive assessment of the central aortic pressure in adults after operative or interventional treatment of aortic coarctation.","authors":"Sebastian Freilinger, Pinar Bambul Heck, Oliver Dewald, Andreas Eicken, Peter Ewert, Annika Freiberger, Frank Harig, Michael Huntgeburth, Manuel Lösch, Harald Kaemmerer, Frank Klawonn, Christian Meierhofer, Fritz Mellert, Martin Middeke, Nicole Nagdyman, Renate Oberhoffer, Fabian von Scheidt, Elsa Ury, Nicole Wolfrum, Ann-Sophie Kaemmerer-Suleiman, Mathieu N Suleiman","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003058","DOIUrl":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortic coarctation (CoA) is a congenital anomaly leading to upper-body hypertension and lower-body hypotension. Despite surgical or interventional treatment, arterial hypertension may develop and contribute to morbidity and mortality. Conventional blood pressure (BP) measurement methods lack precision for individual diagnoses and therapeutic decisions. This study evaluated the use of artificial intelligence-based pulse wave analysis (AI-PWA) to assess central aortic blood pressure (CABP) and related parameters in post-treatment CoA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory, cross-sectional study enrolled 47 adults with CoA, between June 2023 and May 2024. Peripheral BP (PBP) was conventionally measured, and CABP was assessed using the VascAssist2 (inmediQ, Butzbach, Germany). Hypertension was defined by systolic BP≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP≥90 mm Hg for PBP. Using AI-PWA, patients with systolic CABP≥130 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP≥90 mm Hg were classified as hypertensive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort's age was 41.5±13.7 years, with all patients having undergone previous aortic surgery or intervention. PBP measurements showed a systolic BP of 135.4±14.4 mm Hg at the upper and 147.8±20.3 mm Hg at the lower extremities. CABP measurements were significantly lower, with a systolic BP of 114.3±15.8 mm Hg (p<0.001). Overall, 32 patients (68.1%) were diagnosed as hypertensive, either by PBP measurement (n=13/27.7%), because of antihypertensive treatment (n=9; 40.4%), or a combination of both. The measurement of PBP was more likely to indicate arterial hypertension than the measurement of CABP (n=12; 25.5% vs n=4; 8.5%). Pulse wave velocity, indicative of aortic stiffness, averaged 9.1 m/s, with higher values in 13 patients (27.7%), including 4 after end-end anastomosis, 2 after graft interposition and 7 after stent placement/angioplasty as the most recent procedure. An increased augmentation index as an indicator of arterial stiffness was observed in nine patients (19.1%). Comparing PBP and CABP in the entire collective, significant differences were found for CABP in relation to the procedure performed, with higher values in patients after prosthesis interposition as their last treatment (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-PWA provides valuable insights into cardiovascular stress in CoA patients, beyond PBP measurements. The study highlights the need to incorporate CABP measurements into clinical practice to avoid overdiagnosis of hypertension. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to validate these findings and refine management strategies for CoA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784125/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143024015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prognostic role of con-/discordant coronary flow reserve and microvascular resistance in coronary microvascular disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Jin Al-Gully, Federico Oliveri, Jessica Parisa Forouzanfar, Jose Manuel Montero-Cabezas, Johan Wouter Jukema, Melina Cynthia den Haan, Ibtihal Al Amri, Brian Oscar Bingen","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003055","DOIUrl":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) is defined as impaired coronary flow reserve (CFR) and/or increased microvascular resistance (MR) without significant epicardial coronary stenosis. This definition allows for discordant CFR and MR values within patients with CMD. The aim of this meta-analysis is to characterise the prognostic value and pathophysiological backgrounds of CFR and MR con-/discordance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search (PROSPERO CRD42024573004) identified studies determining CFR and MR in patients without significant epicardial coronary artery disease. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) normal CFR and MR, (2) abnormal CFR and MR, (3) abnormal CFR with normal MR and (4) normal CFR with abnormal MR and analysed for all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four studies representing 2310 total participants. Group B had the highest MACE (OR: 3.23; 95% CI 1.95 to 5.36) and mortality rate (OR: 2.27; 95% CI 1.12 to 4.58) compared with group A. Group C, associated with female sex, showed significantly higher MACE (OR: 2.07; 95% CI 1.25 to 3.45) but not mortality (OR: 1.89; 95% CI 0.92 to 3.88) compared with group A. In group D, associated with high body mass index, MACE and mortality rates did not differ significantly from group A (OR: 1.19; 95% CI 0.67 to 2.11 and OR: 0.55; 95% CI 0.16 to 1.90, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abnormal CFR and MR are associated with a high risk of MACE and death. Abnormal CFR and normal MR are associated with an increased MACE-but not death. MACE and mortality risk in discordantly normal CFR and abnormal MR are low. Our findings show the need for tailoring CFR and MR diagnostic thresholds to patient characteristics and raise questions about the presence of CMD in patients with abnormal MR with normal CFR.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759884/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143024148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Systolic blood pressure response during exercise testing in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.","authors":"Henric Nilsson, Carl Bellander, Anna Carlén, Eva Nylander, Kristofer Hedman, Éva Tamás","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003084","DOIUrl":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Exercise testing remains underused in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), partly due to concerns about an exercise-induced drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP). We aimed to study the SBP response to exercise in patients with severe symptomatic AS prior to surgery and 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement due to severe symptomatic AS were enrolled at a single centre in a prospective observational cohort study. Maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was performed on a cycle ergometer at baseline and 1 year postoperatively, using standard termination criteria. The SBP response was categorised according to the last measurements of SBP during exercise, in relation to workload (the SBP/watt-slope) as 'normal' (>0.25 mm Hg/watt), 'flat' (0-0.25 mm Hg/watt) or 'drop' (<0 mm Hg/watt).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45 patients (28 male, 66±9 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 59%±5%, aortic jet velocity 4.6±0.5 m/s) were included, with pairwise comparison available in 31 cases. There were no adverse events. Preoperatively, 4/45 patients were categorised as 'drop', 23 as 'flat' and 18 as 'normal'. There was a change in the distribution of categories from preoperative to postoperative measurements (43% 'normal' vs 74% 'normal', p=0.0046). Maximal SBP and workload-indexed SBP were higher postoperatively than preoperatively (203±26 vs 182±28 mm Hg, p<0.001 and 0.43±0.14 vs 0.29±0.15 mm Hg/watt, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a drop in SBP was infrequent (<10%) in patients with severe symptomatic AS and no adverse events occurred, our results indicate that CPET may be performed under careful monitoring in AS patients. Postoperatively, the SBP reaction improved, with no patient having a drop in SBP.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT02790008.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759871/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143024073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}