球囊肺动脉成形术治疗不能手术的慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压后平均肺动脉压的临床影响。

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ryo Takano, Aoki Tatsuo, Shinya Fujisaki, Mitsumasa Akao, Hiroyuki Endo, Naruhiro Nishi, Hiroya Hayashi, Akiyuki Kotoku, Hiroki Horinouchi, Takatoyo Kiko, Ryotaro Asano, Jin Ueda, Akihiro Tsuji, Kenichi Tsujita, Teruo Noguchi, Tetsuya Fukuda, Takeshi Ogo
{"title":"球囊肺动脉成形术治疗不能手术的慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压后平均肺动脉压的临床影响。","authors":"Ryo Takano, Aoki Tatsuo, Shinya Fujisaki, Mitsumasa Akao, Hiroyuki Endo, Naruhiro Nishi, Hiroya Hayashi, Akiyuki Kotoku, Hiroki Horinouchi, Takatoyo Kiko, Ryotaro Asano, Jin Ueda, Akihiro Tsuji, Kenichi Tsujita, Teruo Noguchi, Tetsuya Fukuda, Takeshi Ogo","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) improves haemodynamics in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Previous studies on BPA have set the treatment objective to achieve a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of <30 mm Hg. However, the clinical impact of mPAP after BPA remains unclear. This study aimed to stratify patients according to their mPAP after BPA and evaluate its association with clinical status and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 304 patients with inoperable CTEPH (median age, 72 (61 to 79) years) who underwent BPA and follow-up right heart catheterisation. Patients were categorised by mPAP after BPA: ≤20, >20-<30 and ≥30 mm Hg groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WHO functional classification, 6 min walk distance and right ventricular ejection fraction were significantly better in the group with a lower mPAP (trend test p=0.007, p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Additionally, the proportions of patients who required pulmonary vasodilators or oxygen therapy were significantly lower in the group with a lower mPAP (trend test p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Across all multivariable models, the mPAP ≥30 mm Hg group had a significantly poorer prognosis compared with the mPAP ≤20 mm Hg group. In contrast, no significant difference was observed between the mPAP ≤20 mm Hg and >20-<30 mm Hg groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with CTEPH after BPA, an mPAP of <30 mm Hg was associated with a favourable prognosis, and patients with an mPAP of ≤20 mm Hg presented with better symptoms, exercise capacity, right ventricular function and more withdrawal from oxygen therapy and pulmonary vasodilators. The BPA treatment goal may require individual adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact of mean pulmonary arterial pressure after balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Takano, Aoki Tatsuo, Shinya Fujisaki, Mitsumasa Akao, Hiroyuki Endo, Naruhiro Nishi, Hiroya Hayashi, Akiyuki Kotoku, Hiroki Horinouchi, Takatoyo Kiko, Ryotaro Asano, Jin Ueda, Akihiro Tsuji, Kenichi Tsujita, Teruo Noguchi, Tetsuya Fukuda, Takeshi Ogo\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) improves haemodynamics in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Previous studies on BPA have set the treatment objective to achieve a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of <30 mm Hg. However, the clinical impact of mPAP after BPA remains unclear. This study aimed to stratify patients according to their mPAP after BPA and evaluate its association with clinical status and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 304 patients with inoperable CTEPH (median age, 72 (61 to 79) years) who underwent BPA and follow-up right heart catheterisation. Patients were categorised by mPAP after BPA: ≤20, >20-<30 and ≥30 mm Hg groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WHO functional classification, 6 min walk distance and right ventricular ejection fraction were significantly better in the group with a lower mPAP (trend test p=0.007, p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Additionally, the proportions of patients who required pulmonary vasodilators or oxygen therapy were significantly lower in the group with a lower mPAP (trend test p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Across all multivariable models, the mPAP ≥30 mm Hg group had a significantly poorer prognosis compared with the mPAP ≤20 mm Hg group. In contrast, no significant difference was observed between the mPAP ≤20 mm Hg and >20-<30 mm Hg groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with CTEPH after BPA, an mPAP of <30 mm Hg was associated with a favourable prognosis, and patients with an mPAP of ≤20 mm Hg presented with better symptoms, exercise capacity, right ventricular function and more withdrawal from oxygen therapy and pulmonary vasodilators. The BPA treatment goal may require individual adaptation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414211/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:球囊肺血管成形术(BPA)可改善不能手术的慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者的血流动力学。我们回顾性分析了304例不能手术的CTEPH患者(中位年龄72岁(61 ~ 79)岁),这些患者接受了BPA和后续的右心导管置入术。结果:低mPAP组的WHO功能分级、6分钟步行距离和右心室射血分数均显著优于低mPAP组(趋势检验p=0.007, p - 20)。结论:BPA后CTEPH患者的mPAP为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical impact of mean pulmonary arterial pressure after balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Clinical impact of mean pulmonary arterial pressure after balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Clinical impact of mean pulmonary arterial pressure after balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Clinical impact of mean pulmonary arterial pressure after balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Background: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) improves haemodynamics in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Previous studies on BPA have set the treatment objective to achieve a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of <30 mm Hg. However, the clinical impact of mPAP after BPA remains unclear. This study aimed to stratify patients according to their mPAP after BPA and evaluate its association with clinical status and long-term outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 304 patients with inoperable CTEPH (median age, 72 (61 to 79) years) who underwent BPA and follow-up right heart catheterisation. Patients were categorised by mPAP after BPA: ≤20, >20-<30 and ≥30 mm Hg groups.

Results: The WHO functional classification, 6 min walk distance and right ventricular ejection fraction were significantly better in the group with a lower mPAP (trend test p=0.007, p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Additionally, the proportions of patients who required pulmonary vasodilators or oxygen therapy were significantly lower in the group with a lower mPAP (trend test p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Across all multivariable models, the mPAP ≥30 mm Hg group had a significantly poorer prognosis compared with the mPAP ≤20 mm Hg group. In contrast, no significant difference was observed between the mPAP ≤20 mm Hg and >20-<30 mm Hg groups.

Conclusions: In patients with CTEPH after BPA, an mPAP of <30 mm Hg was associated with a favourable prognosis, and patients with an mPAP of ≤20 mm Hg presented with better symptoms, exercise capacity, right ventricular function and more withdrawal from oxygen therapy and pulmonary vasodilators. The BPA treatment goal may require individual adaptation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信