Julian S Haimovich, Márton Kolossváry, Ridwan Alam, Raimon Padrós-Valls, Michael T Lu, Aaron D Aguirre
{"title":"Risk stratification of chest pain in the emergency department using artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiograms.","authors":"Julian S Haimovich, Márton Kolossváry, Ridwan Alam, Raimon Padrós-Valls, Michael T Lu, Aaron D Aguirre","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite standardised approaches, subjective assessment and inconsistent diagnostic testing for chest pain in the emergency department (ED) drive costs, disparities and adverse outcomes. Artificial intelligence offers potential to automate and improve risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Using a retrospective cohort of 15 048 patients presenting to the ED of a tertiary care hospital, we trained a neural network classifier ('Chest Pain-AI' or 'CP-AI') to predict a 7-day composite endpoint of major cardiovascular diagnoses including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection and all-cause mortality. Inputs to CP-AI included age, sex, cardiac biomarkers (D-dimer or troponin I or T positivity) and numerical representations of presenting 12-lead ECGs. ECG representations were derived using a publicly available deep learning model known as patient contrastive learning of representations. In an external validation set of 14 476 patients, we evaluated CP-AI against comparator models, including a 'Biomarker Model' incorporating clinical data (age, sex, biomarker positivity), based on both the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). CP-AI outperformed the Biomarker Model in prediction of the 7-day composite endpoint with an AUROC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.83) vs 0.79 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.81) and an AUPRC of 0.46 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.49) vs 0.35 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.37) (p<0.05 for both comparisons).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CP-AI, a fully automated neural network classifier, demonstrated superior performance in the prediction of 7-day major cardiovascular diagnoses for patients presenting with acute chest pain compared with conventional models trained on demographics and cardiac biomarkers. CP-AI may standardise and expedite risk stratification of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Despite standardised approaches, subjective assessment and inconsistent diagnostic testing for chest pain in the emergency department (ED) drive costs, disparities and adverse outcomes. Artificial intelligence offers potential to automate and improve risk stratification.
Methods and results: Using a retrospective cohort of 15 048 patients presenting to the ED of a tertiary care hospital, we trained a neural network classifier ('Chest Pain-AI' or 'CP-AI') to predict a 7-day composite endpoint of major cardiovascular diagnoses including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection and all-cause mortality. Inputs to CP-AI included age, sex, cardiac biomarkers (D-dimer or troponin I or T positivity) and numerical representations of presenting 12-lead ECGs. ECG representations were derived using a publicly available deep learning model known as patient contrastive learning of representations. In an external validation set of 14 476 patients, we evaluated CP-AI against comparator models, including a 'Biomarker Model' incorporating clinical data (age, sex, biomarker positivity), based on both the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). CP-AI outperformed the Biomarker Model in prediction of the 7-day composite endpoint with an AUROC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.83) vs 0.79 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.81) and an AUPRC of 0.46 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.49) vs 0.35 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.37) (p<0.05 for both comparisons).
Conclusions: CP-AI, a fully automated neural network classifier, demonstrated superior performance in the prediction of 7-day major cardiovascular diagnoses for patients presenting with acute chest pain compared with conventional models trained on demographics and cardiac biomarkers. CP-AI may standardise and expedite risk stratification of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain.
背景:尽管标准化的方法,主观评估和不一致的诊断测试胸痛在急诊科(ED)驱动成本,差异和不良后果。人工智能提供了自动化和改善风险分层的潜力。方法和结果:采用回顾性队列,包括15048例在三级医院急诊科就诊的患者,我们训练了一个神经网络分类器(“胸痛- ai”或“CP-AI”)来预测7天主要心血管诊断的复合终点,包括心肌梗死、肺栓塞、主动脉夹层和全因死亡率。CP-AI的输入包括年龄、性别、心脏生物标志物(d -二聚体或肌钙蛋白I或T阳性)和呈现12导联心电图的数值表示。ECG表征是使用公开可用的深度学习模型(称为表征的患者对比学习)导出的。在一个包含14476名患者的外部验证集中,我们基于受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和精确召回曲线下面积(AUPRC),对CP-AI与比较模型进行了评估,包括一个包含临床数据(年龄、性别、生物标志物阳性)的“生物标志物模型”。CP-AI在预测7天复合终点方面优于生物标志物模型,AUROC为0.82 (95% CI 0.81至0.83)vs 0.79 (95% CI 0.78至0.81),AUPRC为0.46 (95% CI 0.44至0.49)vs 0.35 (95% CI 0.33至0.37)(p结论:CP-AI是一种全自动神经网络分类器,与基于人口统计学和心脏生物标志物训练的传统模型相比,它在预测急性胸痛患者7天主要心血管诊断方面表现优异。CP-AI可以标准化和加快胸痛患者在急诊科的风险分层。
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.