Journal of Ecology最新文献

{"title":"Population viability of the orchid Gymnadenia conopsea increases with population size but is not related to genetic diversity","authors":"Linus Söderquist, Johan P. Dahlgren, Nina Sletvold","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14484","url":null,"abstract":"<h2>1 INTRODUCTION</h2>\u0000<p>Reductions in population size, often associated with habitat fragmentation, pose challenges for plant populations from both a demographic and genetic point of view. First, demographic and environmental stochasticity is a greater threat for smaller populations. This is because failed reproduction or death of even a few individuals have a large influence on population dynamics, potentially leading to increased risk of extinction (Lande, <span>1993</span>, <span>1998</span>). Second, in small populations, individuals have lower chance of mutualistic interactions and fewer mating opportunities, potentially increasing inbreeding (Raijmann et al., <span>1994</span>), and lowering seed output (Ågren, <span>1996</span>; Brys et al., <span>2004</span>). Third, in small populations, the impact of genetic drift is expected to be strong, and fixation of mildly deleterious alleles will cause reductions in individual fitness (Oakley & Winn, <span>2012</span>; Reed, <span>2005</span>). Reduced genetic diversity further leads to lower overall adaptive potential and resilience to, for example, diseases and changes in environmental conditions (Hoffmann & Sgrò, <span>2011</span>). Thus, understanding the consequences of a population's size for both demographic and genetic properties that determine current viability and evolutionary potential is important for conservation priorities.</p>\u0000<p>The expected close relationship between population size and genetic and demographic processes has inspired studies that examine links between population size and genetic diversity (Honnay & Jacquemyn, <span>2007</span>; Lammi et al., <span>1999</span>; Leimu et al., <span>2006</span>), population size and inbreeding depression (Michaels et al., <span>2008</span>; Oakley & Winn, <span>2012</span>), and population size and components of fitness (Menges, <span>1991</span>; Morgan, <span>1999</span>). However, few studies have directly examined relationships between genetic and demographic properties of plant populations, using metrics that integrate demographic effects across the whole life cycle (e.g. long-term population growth rate, extinction probability). A few existing studies document an association between genetic erosion and reduced population viability (Endels et al., <span>2007</span>; Hens et al., <span>2017</span>), whereas others found weak or no effect of genetic diversity on population dynamics (Carley et al., <span>2022</span>; Fréville et al., <span>2004</span>; Menges & Dolan, <span>1998</span>). Such variation in the relationship between genetics and demography could not only reflect differences in ecological context, evolutionary history and mating system (Carley et al., <span>2022</span>), but also the power to detect an association. Both a high number of populations and years will be necessary to capture a sufficient range in genetic diversity and provide a reliable estimate of population viability of perennial pl","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143050830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Multiple mechanisms associated with loss of seed bank diversity under nitrogen enrichment","authors":"Miaojun Ma, Anu Eskelinen, Yunpeng Zhao, Carol C. Baskin, Chunming Xin, Panhong Zhang, Zengpeng Guo, Hui Zhang, Xuejing Wang, Pengfei Zhang, Guozhen Du","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14486","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>The soil seed bank is a hidden community below‐ground and a crucial component of plant biodiversity. Nitrogen (N) enrichment can reduce plant species diversity both in above‐ground plant communities and seed banks. However, the mechanisms by which N enrichment affects soil seed banks are not clear.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We investigated the direct and indirect mechanisms of N enrichment in soil seed banks in an N addition experiment in an alpine meadow on the eastern Tibetan Plateau. We combined above‐ground plant community and litter data, fungal diversity, seed bank surveys and seed rain monitoring, and conducted a seed burial experiment to explore seed viability.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We found that the rate of loss of species diversity was slower in seed banks than in above‐ground plant communities. N enrichment directly affected seed banks by decreasing seed viability and enhancing seed germination. Furthermore, small seeds were more prone to loss of viability and increased seed germination under N enrichment than large seeds. At the same time, N enrichment also indirectly decreased seed bank species richness and number of seeds by altering the composition of the plant community and by increasing the amount of litter and fungal diversity. N enrichment also indirectly decreased number of seeds in seed banks through decreasing number of seeds of seed rain, with increasing negative effects due to higher levels of N enrichment.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic>. Our results provide novel insights into multiple direct and indirect mechanisms that can lead to loss of plant diversity in seed banks under N enrichment, with important ramifications on the maintenance of plant biodiversity, ecosystem resilience and restoration in N‐enriched systems.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143049948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The proportion of low abundance species is a key predictor of plant β-diversity across the latitudinal gradient","authors":"Jing Xiao, Yuantao Feng, Huixin Zhang, Chenchao Xu, Kaihang Zhang, Marc W. Cadotte, Lei Cheng","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14487","url":null,"abstract":"<h2> CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT</h2>\u0000<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143044203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A pan-European citizen science study shows population size, climate and land use are related to biased morph ratios in the heterostylous plant Primula veris","authors":"Tsipe Aavik, Triin Reitalu, Marianne Kivastik, Iris Reinula, Sabrina Träger, Evelyn Uuemaa, Marta Barberis, Arjen Biere, Sílvia Castro, Sara A. O. Cousins, Anikó Csecserits, Eleftherios Dariotis, Živa Fišer, Grzegorz Grzejszczak, Cuong Nguyen Huu, Kertu Hool, Hans Jacquemyn, Margaux Julien, Marcin Klisz, Alexander Kmoch, Nikos Krigas, Attila Lengyel, Michael Lenhard, Desalew M. Moges, Zuzana Münzbergová, Ülo Niinemets, Baudewijn Odé, Hana Pánková, Meelis Pärtel, Ricarda Pätsch, Theodora Petanidou, Jan Plue, Radosław Puchałka, Froukje Rienks, Ioulietta Samartza, Julie K. Sheard, Bojana Stojanova, Joachim P. Töpper, Georgios Tsoktouridis, Spas Uzunov, Martin Zobel","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14477","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;h2&gt;1 INTRODUCTION&lt;/h2&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;The last century has witnessed unprecedented habitat loss and fragmentation as a result of global land use change (Haddad et al., &lt;span&gt;2015&lt;/span&gt;). Along with climate change, this trend adversely affects several aspects of biodiversity, causing the loss of genetic diversity (Des Roches et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;; Laikre et al., &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;; Schlaepfer et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;), species richness (Tilman et al., &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;), and related ecosystem services (Cardinale et al., &lt;span&gt;2012&lt;/span&gt;). However, not all species respond in the same way to these factors, with some species being more vulnerable to the mentioned threats than the others. In plants, the response of certain species may depend on their life history, functional traits, phenotypic plasticity, and biogeographic origin (De Kort et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;; Hamrick &amp; Godt, &lt;span&gt;1996&lt;/span&gt;). In addition, the effects of fragmentation and climate change on plant mutualistic partners, such as pollinators (Bennett et al., &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;; Rodger et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;), seed dispersers (Donoso et al., &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;) or mycorrhizal fungi (Kiesewetter et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;; Outhwaite et al., &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;; Senapathi et al., &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;), may affect the relative vulnerability of plant species to the factors of global change. Outcrossing, animal-pollinated plants may be more susceptible to climate change and habitat fragmentation than clonally reproducing, selfing, or anemophilous plants due to potential negative impacts of habitat loss and climate change on pollinators (Aguilar et al., &lt;span&gt;2008&lt;/span&gt;; Bennett et al., &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;; Rodger et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;). Furthermore, reduced pollinator abundance and diversity may ultimately cause shifts in plant–pollinator networks (Zoller et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;), potentially triggering selection of phenotypes with reduced herkogamy or self-incompatibility (Bodbyl Roels &amp; Kelly, &lt;span&gt;2011&lt;/span&gt;; Cheptou, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;; Jacquemyn et al., &lt;span&gt;2012&lt;/span&gt;; Opedal, &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;). However, our understanding of how reproductive plant traits respond to climate change and land use shifts in contemporary landscapes is still limited (Pontarp et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Insufficient pollination poses a particular threat to plant species with floral traits preventing self-pollination, such as heterostyly. Heterostyly is a genetically determined floral polymorphism expressed in the reciprocal positioning of female and male reproductive organs (Barrett, &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;). It has evolved independently across at least 28 plant families (Barrett, &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;). Populations of heterostylous plants comprise two (distylous species) or three (tristylous species) morphs with reciprocal lengths of style and anthers. Differences between morphs may also be expressed in the size and morphology of stigmatic papillae and pollen grains (Costa, Castro, et al., &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143021105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Plant phylogeny, traits and fungal community composition as drivers of plant–soil feedbacks","authors":"Christopher J. Sweeney, Marina Semchenko, Franciska T. de Vries, Bart E. van Dongen, Richard D. Bardgett","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14481","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;h2&gt;1 INTRODUCTION&lt;/h2&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Plant–soil feedbacks (PSFs) are a key component of terrestrial ecosystem functioning and influence vegetation dynamics in many ways, such as: the maintenance of species coexistence (Crawford et al., &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;; Klironomos, &lt;span&gt;2002&lt;/span&gt;; Teste et al., &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;), plant invasiveness (Aldorfová et al., &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;; Levine et al., &lt;span&gt;2006&lt;/span&gt;) and successional changes in plant community composition (Bauer et al., &lt;span&gt;2015&lt;/span&gt;; Kardol et al., &lt;span&gt;2006&lt;/span&gt;). PSFs involve the modification of soil biological and abiotic properties by a given plant species that have downstream effects on the growth of future individuals in the same soil. These PSFs can be positive, negative or neutral, where plant performance is improved, reduced or unaffected, respectively, when grown in soil previously occupied by the same species compared with soil conditioned by other species (Bever et al., &lt;span&gt;1997&lt;/span&gt;; Van der Putten et al., &lt;span&gt;2013&lt;/span&gt;). Given this wide variation in PSF observed among species, there is considerable interest in developing a framework that can be used to predict the direction and magnitude of PSF responses as a function of plant species characteristics (de Vries et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;; Rutten &amp; Allan, &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;; Semchenko et al., &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;). However, despite an abundance of studies exploring individual aspects of PSFs, our understanding of how plant traits and phylogeny, via associated effects on soil microbial communities, shape PSFs is still limited by the lack of comprehensive empirical tests.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Plants modify their immediate environment in many ways and can shape the composition and diversity of microbial communities within their root zones (Grayston et al., &lt;span&gt;1998&lt;/span&gt;; Hu et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;). This ‘conditioning’ of rhizosphere microbial communities can regulate PSFs, and, as such, PSF responses may be predictable based upon how a particular plant species modifies its root-associated microbiome (Fitzpatrick et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;; Semchenko et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;; Wilschut et al., &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;). Previous studies indicate that root-associated fungi, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and fungal pathotrophs, play an important role in determining PSFs (Cortois et al., &lt;span&gt;2016&lt;/span&gt;; Semchenko et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;). Several studies show that these fungal guilds are strongly influenced by plant species identity (Frac et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;; Semchenko et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;) and that increased associations with AMF (Cortois et al., &lt;span&gt;2016&lt;/span&gt;; Semchenko et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;) or fungal pathotrophs (Semchenko et al., &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;; Wilschut et al., &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;) lead to more positive and negative PSFs, respectively. There is also evidence that AMF and pathotroph communities are strongly determined by plant phylogenetic relatedness (Barberán et al., &lt;span&gt;2015&lt;/span&gt;; Sweeney et ","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142987136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Large seeds as a defensive strategy against partial granivory in the Fagaceae","authors":"Si‐Chong Chen, Alexandre Antonelli, Xiao Huang, Neng Wei, Can Dai, Qing‐Feng Wang","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14480","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Large seeds interact with a wide range of animals (e.g. predators) and are dispersed via certain small animals' foraging behaviours, such as caching. Some of the most iconic species of large‐seeded plants have long fascinated ecologists studying biotic interactions, such as oaks and their relatives in the Fagaceae family.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>The Fagaceae acorns are dispersed through synzoochory, a specific dispersal mode in which animal partners act as both seed dispersers and granivores. Although granivory (i.e. seed herbivory) can profoundly impact the survival of plant offspring, partial damage on seed reserves is a prevalent phenomenon that does not always result in seed mortality. However, previous single‐species studies have resulted in mixed evidence across treatments and traits, leaving the impact of partial granivory on plant regeneration unclear.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Using artificial granivory experiments on 1185 seeds of 20 Fagaceae species, here we quantify how partial loss of seed reserve affects seed germination, seedling growth and biomass allocation across a damage gradient from 0% to 96% biomass loss.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We show that, although partial granivory reduces seedling growth (e.g. total biomass and number of leaves), it does not significantly affect seed germination or the overall biomass allocation of seedlings (e.g. leaf mass fraction and root:shoot biomass ratio). Seedlings from seeds more preyed upon have higher specific leaf area, indicating that they tend to grow larger but less protected leaves against herbivores, perhaps to compete for light.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic>. As seeds dispersed through scatter‐hoarding granivores have evolved relatively large sizes, like Fagaceae acorns, our findings demonstrate that this type of seeds may tolerate partial granivory in exchange for high dispersal efficiency. This study opens new perspectives to our understanding of seed size diversity and evolution. We conclude that seed size per se is a defensive trait, that large seeds counteract potential losses of seed reserve to escape full predation and allow germination.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142986000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rooting depth and specific leaf area modify the impact of experimental drought duration on temperate grassland species","authors":"Yvonne Künzi,&nbsp;Michaela Zeiter,&nbsp;Markus Fischer,&nbsp;Andreas Stampfli","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14468","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2745.14468","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"113 2","pages":"445-458"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2745.14468","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142961303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Nitrogen content of herbarium specimens from arable fields and mesic meadows reflect the intensifying agricultural management during the 20th century","authors":"Paul Kühn, Raymond Umazekabiri, Christine Römermann, Helge Bruelheide, Karsten Wesche","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14474","url":null,"abstract":"<h2> CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT</h2>\u0000<p>The authors state that no conflict of interest exists.</p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"203 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142936527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Seasonal shifts in plant diversity effects on above-ground–below-ground phenological synchrony","authors":"Ana E. Bonato Asato,&nbsp;Claudia Guimarães-Steinicke,&nbsp;Gideon Stein,&nbsp;Berit Schreck,&nbsp;Teja Kattenborn,&nbsp;Anne Ebeling,&nbsp;Stefan Posch,&nbsp;Joachim Denzler,&nbsp;Tim Büchner,&nbsp;Maha Shadaydeh,&nbsp;Christian Wirth,&nbsp;Nico Eisenhauer,&nbsp;Jes Hines","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14470","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2745.14470","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"113 2","pages":"472-484"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2745.14470","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A global synthesis of the ecological effects of co-invasions","authors":"Rameez Ahmad, Showkeen A. Lone, Irfan Rashid, Anzar Ahmad Khuroo","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14475","url":null,"abstract":"<h2> CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT</h2>\u0000<p>The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.</p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142929713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}