{"title":"A conservative contradiction? The effect of CEO political ideology on strategic risk-taking during national partisan conflict","authors":"Kerry Hudson","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102584","url":null,"abstract":"Increasing polarization in U.S. politics has led the economics and finance literatures to examine its macroeconomic implications, revealing a counterintuitive effect: national partisan conflict reduces macroeconomic volatility, creating legislative gridlock that lowers investors' perceptions of risk. However, implications for management remain unclear, as no research has sought to explain heterogeneity in firms' responses to this phenomenon. We theorize that this occurs because partisan conflict induces shifts in strategic risk-taking, contingent upon differences in CEOs' risk aversion and cognitive disposition. Drawing on upper echelons theory, we hypothesize that conservative CEOs, who are typically risk averse, will be more willing to take strategic risks under the macroeconomic conditions associated with partisan conflict. A study of 375 firms from 2000 to 2022 supports this, showing a shift towards higher-risk strategies among conservative CEOs when partisan conflict is high. This effect is robust to industry effects and independent from other political and economic uncertainties. Additional analyses indicate that this is driven by CEOs' disposition rather than party bias, supporting an ideologically asymmetric, environmentally contingent mechanism whereby shifts in partisan conflict increase the significance of the attentional and cognitive tendencies associated with conservatism in determining firm-level risk-taking. These findings extend the managerial relevance of macro-level research on partisan conflict, offering theoretical explanations that evince its ostensibly unpredictable effects on firms’ strategic investment decisions.","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145254555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eduardo Schiehll , Henrique Castro Martins , Krista B. Lewellyn
{"title":"Symbolic or substantive? How shareholder heterogeneity shapes the purpose of the corporation","authors":"Eduardo Schiehll , Henrique Castro Martins , Krista B. Lewellyn","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102582","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102582","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how the heterogeneity of shareholders’ financial and social interests creates tension around competing interpretations of the purpose of the corporation, particularly regarding their incompatibility and relative prevalence of initiatives that extend beyond profit maximization. These tensions are especially salient when shareholder activists—who possess both legal rights and economic influence—exert divergent pressures to achieve both financial and social goals, which then shapes how firms respond to such pressures. Based on a sample of 5302 shareholder-initiated proposals submitted to S&P 1500 firms, we find that when the variety of shareholders targeting a firm blends conflicting perspectives about pursuing profit and social goals to a greater extent, firms are more likely to respond with symbolic actions, for a consequential misalignment between advocated CSR policies and implemented practices. We also provide evidence that this association is weaker in the presence of activism and ownership by shareholders who publicly self-identify as socially oriented investors, suggesting that these investors influence both the credibility and the centrality of the social logic in managerial decision-making. Our results advance understanding of how firms navigate the complexities of achieving a purpose of the corporation beyond profit maximization, amid the evolving landscape of divergent shareholder interests and activism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"58 6","pages":"Article 102582"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145155545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Embracing outward FDI while continuing exports? The impact of heterogeneity and vulnerability in family firms","authors":"Asimabha Bhowmick , Arindam Mondal , Somnath Lahiri","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102581","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102581","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>What factors prompt family firms to undertake change in their internationalization strategy? This study argues that type of management (family vs. nonfamily) and internal and external vulnerabilities in the environment significantly impact how family firms embrace outward FDI (OFDI) while continuing exports. Drawing on the mixed gamble perspective and utilizing a sample of listed family firms from India (n = 278), this study finds that family-managed firms, as compared to nonfamily or professionally managed firms, are less likely to embrace OFDI while maintaining their ongoing exports. Results further demonstrate that the likelihood of family-managed firms’ adoption of OFDI increases when they experience internal vulnerability (performance below aspirations) as well as external vulnerability (foreign competition). This study concludes by discussing the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings and highlighting fertile avenues of future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"58 6","pages":"Article 102581"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145119256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fei Jia , Junjie Hong , Chengqi Wang , Alan Au Kai Ming
{"title":"Creating high-quality innovations in China: The role of political ties and formal institutions","authors":"Fei Jia , Junjie Hong , Chengqi Wang , Alan Au Kai Ming","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102572","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102572","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Firms in emerging economies, such as China, are increasingly prioritizing high-quality technological innovations to boost global competitiveness. While the role of executive political ties in enhancing firms' innovation performance is well-documented, their specific contribution to fostering high-quality technological innovations remains underexplored. This study investigates how political ties influence innovation quality in China and analyses how certain firm- and region-specific institutions shape their effectiveness. Drawing on a sample of Chinese manufacturing firms, the findings reveal that political ties enhance high-quality innovations by offering financial, technological, and market-specific advantages. However, their effect is significantly moderated by formal institutions such as business group affiliation, foreign ownership, and region-level intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement, which diminish firms’ reliance on political ties. These findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of the interplay between informal networks and formal institutions in driving innovation quality in emerging economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"58 6","pages":"Article 102572"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145027606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The impact of firms’ going public mode and capital market liability of foreignness on their choice of jurisdiction in the United States","authors":"HoWook Shin , Young Hoon Jung","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102571","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102571","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the rapid integration of global capital markets, firms often face capital market liability of foreignness (CMLOF) when raising capital abroad. Given that CMLOF stems from foreign firms' lack of legitimacy in host countries, we examine whether and how foreign and domestic firms’ modes of going public differently affect their adoption of legitimate domestic business practices (i.e., organizational isomorphism) to advance institutional theory that proposes organizational isomorphism as a remedy for the legitimacy deficit of firms. Among the two major modes of going public, reverse mergers (RM) are considered less legitimate than initial public offerings (IPOs). Thus, we argue that foreign firms already suffering from CMLOF require legitimacy even more to assure investors of their viability when using a less legitimate mode (RM), whereas domestic firms seek legitimacy more actively when using a more legitimate mode (IPO) that presents better opportunities to raise substantial capital. Focusing on Delaware incorporation as a legitimate business practice and analyzing IPO and RM deals in the United States from 2007 to 2016, we found empirical support of our arguments. Contributions and limitations are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"58 6","pages":"Article 102571"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145005192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The influence of CEO social capital on turnaround success","authors":"Florian Behling, Jan-Hendrik Meier, Jochen Zimmermann","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102570","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102570","url":null,"abstract":"This study extends current knowledge on the role of the CEO in turnaround management. Drawing from upper echelons and resource dependence theories, we analyze how the turnaround performance of declining firms is influenced by CEO social capital, measured as CEO networks extending to other top executives. Using an international, multisectoral matched-pair sample of 142 firms that have faced decline, we show that a CEO's executive network is associated with a higher likelihood of turnaround success and better performance of the firm. Our study contributes to turnaround research and has practical implications for equity and debt investors as well as top managers.","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"18 1","pages":"102570"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144901709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Towards purposeful strategic planning: A mixed research synthesis across disciplines","authors":"Bert George","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102563","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102563","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Strategic planning is one of the most popular strategy approaches across sectors and across the globe. Unsurprisingly, research on strategic planning crosses disciplines ranging from management and public administration to healthcare, urban planning and sustainability. This fragmentation has resulted in research silos, with little interaction between disciplines. Integration across disciplines is needed to understand the various purposes strategic planning can serve. This study uses topic modeling, a machine learning tool, to analyze 6361 articles on strategic planning. Ten topics are identified, which can be clustered into four categories: <em>societal issues and challenges</em>, <em>processes and practices</em>, <em>street-level sectors</em>, and <em>corporate functions</em>. Time trends analysis indicates a steep increase over time in research attention to strategic planning for the purpose of addressing societal issues and challenges. Combined with a qualitative meta-narrative review, these findings result in a <em>purposeful strategic planning</em> definition and conceptualization to guide theory, research and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"58 4","pages":"Article 102563"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144563194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Saeedeh Ahmadi , Tom Mom , Alexander Schmidt , Henk Volberda
{"title":"Multiple goal conflicts and exploratory innovation: Does alignment between team and organization help or hurt?","authors":"Saeedeh Ahmadi , Tom Mom , Alexander Schmidt , Henk Volberda","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102562","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102562","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the varying impacts of multiple goal conflicts on employees' exploratory innovative behaviors. Although innovation is vital for an organization's survival and competitive advantage, the simultaneous pursuit of other goals may create goal conflicts for employees: increasing pressure on their scarce resources, including time and cognitive capacity. While much of the existing research discusses goal conflicts in general or emphasizes their negative performance consequences, we extend this literature by theorizing about two distinct ways individuals may interpret goal conflicts—either as a trade-off (e.g., innovation vs. revenue) or as complementary (e.g., innovation vs. safety)—and how these interpretations affect exploratory innovation. Moreover, we theorize that team–organization alignment moderates these effects. Our findings, based on multilevel, multisource, time-lagged data from a large energy company, indicate that conflicts involving innovation goals do not uniformly impact employee exploratory behavior. Increasing levels of conflict between innovation and safety goals are associated with employees conducting more innovation activities, but the expected negative effect of innovation-revenue conflicts is insignificant. Moreover, in a context of high alignment the innovation-safety conflict triggers employees to innovate more; in contrast, for the innovation-revenue conflict it is the opposite. Our study offers important implications for the literature on multiple goal conflict and highlights the critical roles of employees and their alignment with senior leadership.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"58 4","pages":"Article 102562"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144515330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tomi Laamanen , Ann-Kristin Weiser , Georg von Krogh , William Ocasio
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in adaptive strategy creation and implementation: Toward enhanced attentional control in strategy processes","authors":"Tomi Laamanen , Ann-Kristin Weiser , Georg von Krogh , William Ocasio","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102561","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102561","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article focuses on the deployment of proprietary artificial intelligence (AI) systems in strategy creation and implementation processes, with a specific focus on their role in enhancing organizational attentional control. By employing the attention-based view (ABV) as an overarching theoretical framework, we examine how company-specific AI systems trained on proprietary data can support strategy processes. We identify three key contributions of AI in strategy creation and implementation processes: (1) broadening organizational attention to external and internal developments, (2) democratizing strategic processes through improved transparency and inclusivity, and (3) accelerating feedback loops with real-time monitoring of strategy implementation progress. Potential challenges associated with the deployment of AI systems for attentional control are also addressed. The paper concludes by putting forward potential directions for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"58 4","pages":"Article 102561"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144341049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Catherine Archambault Janvier , Wim Van Lent , Jörg Sydow
{"title":"Breaking organizational paths for strategic renewal: Towards a dialectical perspective","authors":"Catherine Archambault Janvier , Wim Van Lent , Jörg Sydow","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102560","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102560","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Strategic renewal is key to organizations' long-term success, but may be difficult to achieve if they are locked into a particular action path. Unfortunately, breaking organizational paths remains somewhat elusive due to a binary opposition in the strategic renewal literature between path breaking and path dependence, which hampers more complex process theorization. Asking what roles path breaking and path dependence exactly play in strategic renewal, we perform an in-depth case study of path-breaking interventions at fashion retailer Kiabi. This firm gradually moved from a path of disintegrative to integrative collaborative alignment between departments, whereby adaptive expectations regarding others’ willingness to collaborate gradually improved. Chiefly, we find that strategic renewal is a function of two concurrent dialectics: 1) between path-breaking interventions and relapses into old path-dependent tendencies; and 2) between initiatives by upper management and their firm-wide implementation. We contribute to the literature by demonstrating that organizational path dependence, through managerial reflection and action, can be integral to path breaking, and, more broadly, strategic renewal. Furthermore, we extend common notions of managerial agency in path breaking by highlighting the involvement of various hierarchical layers, while, paradoxically, we relax the strong assumption of managerial agency that exists in studies on open strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"58 4","pages":"Article 102560"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144304928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}