Journal of the Bible and its Reception最新文献_第4页

On the Banks of Muddy Waters: Ayako Miura’s Soulful Adaptation of the Story of Job 《浑水之岸:三浦绫子对约伯故事的深情改编》

Journal of the Bible and its Reception Pub Date : 2022-04-08 DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2020-0020

S. Takagi

引用次数: 1

Luke 22:43-44 and the Mormon Jesus: Protestant Past, KJV-Only Present 路加福音22:43-44和摩门教的耶稣:新教的过去，英国新译本——只有现在

Journal of the Bible and its Reception Pub Date : 2022-04-08 DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2021-0016

Grant Adamson

引用次数: 1

Quoting Before Canon: The Various Forms of Authority Attributed to the Epistle to the Hebrews in the Second and Third Century 在正典之前引用:第二和第三世纪希伯来书中各种形式的权威

Journal of the Bible and its Reception Pub Date : 2022-04-08 DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2020-0015

David Young

{"title":"Quoting Before Canon: The Various Forms of Authority Attributed to the Epistle to the Hebrews in the Second and Third Century","authors":"David Young","doi":"10.1515/jbr-2020-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2020-0015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The scriptural citations of early Christian theologians have often been enlisted in scholarly reconstructions concerning the development of the canon. The underlying assumption in many such reconstructions appears to have been that the frequent quotation of a writing indicates a corresponding level of authority for that writing. More recent scholarship has challenged this assumption by drawing attention to the specific rhetorical contexts in which scriptural quotations are employed. The current work contributes to this trajectory of research and the field of reception history more generally by considering citations of the Epistle to the Hebrews among the second- and third-century Christian writers who utilize the epistle most frequently, namely, Justin Martyr, Tertullian, Clement, and Origen. The utilization of the Epistle to the Hebrews by these authors bears much greater resemblance, I argue, to the compositional and citational practices of their Greek predecessors than to the canon lists created by Christian theologians in the fourth century and beyond. The evaluation of these citations within the framework of later debates about canon, therefore, serves to flatten the diversity of approaches evident among the citations of Hebrews prior to the fourth century. Careful examination of citations from the Epistle to the Hebrews in the second and third centuries reveals that the various ways in which the document was quoted were frequently determined by the immediate rhetorical context in which those quotations were employed rather than by debates about the epistle’s authority.","PeriodicalId":17249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bible and its Reception","volume":"1 1","pages":"27 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82377350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Frontmatter

Journal of the Bible and its Reception Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2021-frontmatter2

引用次数: 0

Reverse-Engineering the Covenant: Moses, Massachusetts Bay and the Construction of a City on a Hill 逆向工程契约:摩西，马萨诸塞湾和山上之城的建设

Journal of the Bible and its Reception Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2021-0012

M. Rowley

引用次数: 0

Creation, Fall and Political Order — Prussian Conservatism and the Old Testament 创造、堕落与政治秩序——普鲁士保守主义与旧约

Journal of the Bible and its Reception Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2021-0009

Laura C. Achtelstetter

引用次数: 0

The Old and the New Israel: The Cultural Origins of the Special Relationship 新旧以色列:特殊关系的文化渊源

Journal of the Bible and its Reception Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2021-0006

E. Shalev

{"title":"The Old and the New Israel: The Cultural Origins of the Special Relationship","authors":"E. Shalev","doi":"10.1515/jbr-2021-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2021-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Understandings of the new American nation as a “Second Israel,” and a prevalent political discourse devoted to the narratives of the Old Testament, were a distinct trait of the early United States. Indeed, the images and narratives of the Old Testament were as common in the formative decades of the United States, in the words of the great historian Perry Miller, as “the air that the people breathed.” This attachment to the Old Testament, and the fact that American nationalism and twentieth century Zionism crystalized around the biblical history of the Israelites, bears considerably on the relationship of the two nations. The “special” bond between the modern countries, which is commonly understood in terms of pragmatism, interests, and shared ideologies, thus rests on a deep cultural connection. The American public’s consistent backing of the State of Israel (one that far surpasses the constituency of evangelical Christian Zionists), which politically translates into a robust, lasting and bi-partisan support that defies the arithmetic of appeals to Jewish voters (or donors) seems puzzling at times. It becomes more intelligible in light of the centuries-long tradition of American public speech describing the nation as a new incarnation of biblical Israel. This usable biblical past, which continues to influence American culture in meaningful ways, adds an important dimension for our understanding of the “special relationship” between the United States and Israel.","PeriodicalId":17249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bible and its Reception","volume":"15 1","pages":"229 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83661103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Old Testament and Nationalism: Hebrew Bible, Jewish People, English Nation 旧约与民族主义:希伯来圣经，犹太人，英语民族

Journal of the Bible and its Reception Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2021-0007

Liah Greenfeld

引用次数: 0

“We the People of Israel”: Covenant, Constitution, and the Supposed Biblical Origins of Modern Democratic Political Thought “我们以色列人”:现代民主政治思想的契约、宪法和圣经起源

Journal of the Bible and its Reception Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2021-0005

Sophia Johnson

{"title":"“We the People of Israel”: Covenant, Constitution, and the Supposed Biblical Origins of Modern Democratic Political Thought","authors":"Sophia Johnson","doi":"10.1515/jbr-2021-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2021-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As an originally political term, study of the concept of “covenant” has long demonstrated the intersection of biblical studies and political theory. In recent decades, the association between covenant and constitution has come to the forefront of modern political thought in attempts to find the origins of certain democratic ideals in the descriptions of biblical Israel, in order to garner either religious or cultural authority. This is exemplified in the claims of Daniel J. Elazar that the first conceptual seeds of American federalism are found in the covenants of the Hebrew Bible. Taking Elazar’s work as a starting and end point, this paper applies contemporary biblical scholarship to his definition of biblical covenant in order to reveal the influences of his own American political environment and that of the interpreters he is dependent upon. The notion that biblical covenant or its interpretation remains a monolithic or static concept is overturned by a survey of the diverse receptions of covenant in the history of biblical scholarship from the late 19th to the late 20th centuries, contrasting American and German interpretive trends. As such, I aim to highlight the reciprocal relationship between religion and politics, and the academic study of both, in order to challenge the claim that modern political thought can be traced back to biblical conceptions.","PeriodicalId":17249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bible and its Reception","volume":"6 1","pages":"247 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73805247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Old Testament Imaginaries of the Nation in German, Dutch, and Anglo-American Protestant Political Thought 德国、荷兰和英美新教政治思想中的旧约民族想象

Journal of the Bible and its Reception Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2021-0025

S. Johnson, Mariëtta Van der Tol

引用次数: 0