Priyanka Rajashekar, Charles N. Kroll, Richard M. Vogel
{"title":"Extending the MMMT Temporal Change Detection Tool to Assess Significant Shifts in Diverse Environmental Datasets","authors":"Priyanka Rajashekar, Charles N. Kroll, Richard M. Vogel","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70096","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines applications of the visual modified Mood's median test (MMMT) tool, which was originally developed for assessing temporal changes in streamflow regimes, to assess changes in a broader range of critically important environmental variables. The original MMMT tool is a Flow Duration Curve (FDC) based graphical tool that is integrated with a nonparametric statistical framework to assess the significance of changes to typical (median) streamflow across the entire range of streamflow magnitudes. We expand the tool's applicability to assess temporal variations in several important environmental variables, including streamflow intermittency, precipitation patterns, groundwater levels, air temperature, and water quality, in response to anthropogenic interventions or natural processes. The selected case studies are in locations with serious environmental concerns, with some involving mitigation efforts to improve environmental conditions. Our results show that the tool effectively detects shifts in environmental variables, aligns with findings from other studies, provides a more extensive assessment of environmental changes than methods focusing on only a few data conditions, and conveys this information in a clear and concise manner. The outcomes underscore the tool's robustness, generalizability, and potential as a valuable resource for future assessments of changes in environmental conditions over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70096","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147563884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tyelyn Brigino, Kai Rains, Edgar Guerrón-Orejuela, Jacob Argueta, Syverine Bentz, Coowe Walker, Mark Rains
{"title":"No Groundwater, No Fish: The Critical Role of Groundwater in Supporting Non-Glacial, Salmon-Bearing Rivers in South-Central Alaska","authors":"Tyelyn Brigino, Kai Rains, Edgar Guerrón-Orejuela, Jacob Argueta, Syverine Bentz, Coowe Walker, Mark Rains","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70100","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1752-1688.70100","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Groundwater discharge plays an important role in the hydrologic and ecologic functioning of rivers including sustaining streamflow and related habitat year-round. Simultaneously, groundwater supports the increasing demands of people as the global population continues to grow. Balancing the needs of users becomes increasingly important as climate change introduces greater uncertainty in water resources and fisheries, especially for economically important anadromous species that depend on freshwater resources. We investigated the seasonal and regional variability of groundwater contributions to six non-glacial mainstem salmon-bearing rivers in south-central Alaska. We hypothesized that groundwater contributes more than half of the annual streamflow, and nearly all of the streamflow during late summer and mid-winter periods. Our results show that groundwater discharge is the dominant source of streamflow, with an annual relative contribution of 70%. Groundwater contribution to streamflow varies seasonally, ranging from approximately 50%–70% during peak flow to 70%–80% during low flow. Groundwater contribution to streamflow also varies spatially, with maximum differences in groundwater contribution between watersheds ranging ±20 percentage points. However, all rivers in the study area followed similar trends, with higher groundwater contributions in summer and winter and lower contributions in spring and fall.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147563954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tyelyn Brigino, Kai Rains, Edgar Guerrón-Orejuela, Jacob Argueta, Syverine Bentz, Coowe Walker, Mark Rains
{"title":"No Groundwater, No Fish: The Critical Role of Groundwater in Supporting Non-Glacial, Salmon-Bearing Rivers in South-Central Alaska","authors":"Tyelyn Brigino, Kai Rains, Edgar Guerrón-Orejuela, Jacob Argueta, Syverine Bentz, Coowe Walker, Mark Rains","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70100","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Groundwater discharge plays an important role in the hydrologic and ecologic functioning of rivers including sustaining streamflow and related habitat year-round. Simultaneously, groundwater supports the increasing demands of people as the global population continues to grow. Balancing the needs of users becomes increasingly important as climate change introduces greater uncertainty in water resources and fisheries, especially for economically important anadromous species that depend on freshwater resources. We investigated the seasonal and regional variability of groundwater contributions to six non-glacial mainstem salmon-bearing rivers in south-central Alaska. We hypothesized that groundwater contributes more than half of the annual streamflow, and nearly all of the streamflow during late summer and mid-winter periods. Our results show that groundwater discharge is the dominant source of streamflow, with an annual relative contribution of 70%. Groundwater contribution to streamflow varies seasonally, ranging from approximately 50%–70% during peak flow to 70%–80% during low flow. Groundwater contribution to streamflow also varies spatially, with maximum differences in groundwater contribution between watersheds ranging ±20 percentage points. However, all rivers in the study area followed similar trends, with higher groundwater contributions in summer and winter and lower contributions in spring and fall.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147563955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Climate Change Impacts on Hydrology in the Upper James Watershed, Virginia","authors":"Imiya Mudiyanselage Chathuranika, Dalya Ismael","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70099","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1752-1688.70099","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hydrological modeling of the Upper James Watershed (UJW), Virginia, is critical for predicting water availability, flood management, agriculture, ecosystem protection, and hydropower production under increasing climate change. The Hydrologic Engineering Center–Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) is applied to evaluate climate change impacts on key hydrological components within the watershed. Future climate conditions were assessed for the near (NF: 2026–2050), mid (MF: 2051–2075), and far (FF: 2076–2100) periods using three Global Climate Models (GCMs) under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways SSP 2–4.5 and SSP 5–8.5. Climate data were bias-corrected using the Linear Scaling Method (LSM) and used to drive the HEC-HMS model. Results project annual precipitation reductions of 8.19% (SSP 2–4.5) and 14.63% (SSP 5–8.5) for 2026–2100 relative to the 1998–2022 baseline, with corresponding annual streamflow changes of a 4.16% increase and a 0.62% decrease, respectively. Key hydrological components, including infiltration, evapotranspiration, interception, surface runoff, and baseflow, are projected to decline across all future periods, with reductions ranging from 10.17% (NF) to 17.00% (FF) under SSP 2–4.5 and from 11.74% (NF) to 30.20% (FF) under SSP 5–8.5. These results highlight the need for improved reservoir operations, sustainable land-use practices, and enhanced flood and drought forecasting to mitigate climate impacts and support informed decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147563408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Climate Change Impacts on Hydrology in the Upper James Watershed, Virginia","authors":"Imiya Mudiyanselage Chathuranika, Dalya Ismael","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70099","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hydrological modeling of the Upper James Watershed (UJW), Virginia, is critical for predicting water availability, flood management, agriculture, ecosystem protection, and hydropower production under increasing climate change. The Hydrologic Engineering Center–Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) is applied to evaluate climate change impacts on key hydrological components within the watershed. Future climate conditions were assessed for the near (NF: 2026–2050), mid (MF: 2051–2075), and far (FF: 2076–2100) periods using three Global Climate Models (GCMs) under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways SSP 2–4.5 and SSP 5–8.5. Climate data were bias-corrected using the Linear Scaling Method (LSM) and used to drive the HEC-HMS model. Results project annual precipitation reductions of 8.19% (SSP 2–4.5) and 14.63% (SSP 5–8.5) for 2026–2100 relative to the 1998–2022 baseline, with corresponding annual streamflow changes of a 4.16% increase and a 0.62% decrease, respectively. Key hydrological components, including infiltration, evapotranspiration, interception, surface runoff, and baseflow, are projected to decline across all future periods, with reductions ranging from 10.17% (NF) to 17.00% (FF) under SSP 2–4.5 and from 11.74% (NF) to 30.20% (FF) under SSP 5–8.5. These results highlight the need for improved reservoir operations, sustainable land-use practices, and enhanced flood and drought forecasting to mitigate climate impacts and support informed decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147563379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shoukat Ahmed, Marc R. Owen, Robert T. Pavlowsky, Matthew C. Pierson
{"title":"Legacy Effects of Forest Changes and Channel Modification on Flood Behavior in the Ozark Highlands, Missouri","authors":"Shoukat Ahmed, Marc R. Owen, Robert T. Pavlowsky, Matthew C. Pierson","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70098","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1752-1688.70098","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Forested watersheds regulate flood response through canopy interception, infiltration, and soil–channel interactions, but combined effects of forest conversion, legacy disturbance, and channel modification on headwater hydrology are poorly understood. This study examines impacts of historical forest disturbance and channel modification on flood behavior in Big Barren Creek (48 km<sup>2</sup>), a headwater watershed in southeastern Ozark Highlands, Missouri. 1880–1920 intensive logging removed > 90% native shortleaf pine, shifting to hardwood-dominated forests with soil degradation and channel modifications. Using HEC-HMS, early-spring storm flood response (minimal interception, high risk) was simulated under present-day, pre-settlement, and post-disturbance conditions. Pine-to-hardwood conversion reduced interception ~50%, increasing peak discharge 24%, runoff 32%, and shortening lag time 7% versus pre-settlement. Channel modifications increased flashiness, raising peaks +9% and advancing time-to-peak 45 min. Post-disturbance forests produced ~20% less runoff than present-day, but degraded soils increased peak discharge 17% and prolonged duration 8%. Restoring 100% shortleaf pine nearly reproduced pre-settlement hydrology; complete hardwood conversion had little additional impact on current conditions. Vegetation composition, soil condition, and channel morphology are primary controls on headwater flood response; integrated forest and channel management can enhance watershed resilience.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147569307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shoukat Ahmed, Marc R. Owen, Robert T. Pavlowsky, Matthew C. Pierson
{"title":"Legacy Effects of Forest Changes and Channel Modification on Flood Behavior in the Ozark Highlands, Missouri","authors":"Shoukat Ahmed, Marc R. Owen, Robert T. Pavlowsky, Matthew C. Pierson","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70098","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1752-1688.70098","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Forested watersheds regulate flood response through canopy interception, infiltration, and soil–channel interactions, but combined effects of forest conversion, legacy disturbance, and channel modification on headwater hydrology are poorly understood. This study examines impacts of historical forest disturbance and channel modification on flood behavior in Big Barren Creek (48 km<sup>2</sup>), a headwater watershed in southeastern Ozark Highlands, Missouri. 1880–1920 intensive logging removed > 90% native shortleaf pine, shifting to hardwood-dominated forests with soil degradation and channel modifications. Using HEC-HMS, early-spring storm flood response (minimal interception, high risk) was simulated under present-day, pre-settlement, and post-disturbance conditions. Pine-to-hardwood conversion reduced interception ~50%, increasing peak discharge 24%, runoff 32%, and shortening lag time 7% versus pre-settlement. Channel modifications increased flashiness, raising peaks +9% and advancing time-to-peak 45 min. Post-disturbance forests produced ~20% less runoff than present-day, but degraded soils increased peak discharge 17% and prolonged duration 8%. Restoring 100% shortleaf pine nearly reproduced pre-settlement hydrology; complete hardwood conversion had little additional impact on current conditions. Vegetation composition, soil condition, and channel morphology are primary controls on headwater flood response; integrated forest and channel management can enhance watershed resilience.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147569352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jérémie Sage, William Pophillat, Fabrice Rodriguez, Isabelle Braud
{"title":"Untangling the Factors Governing the Catchment-Scale Impacts of On-Site Stormwater Infiltration in Shallow Groundwater Contexts","authors":"Jérémie Sage, William Pophillat, Fabrice Rodriguez, Isabelle Braud","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70092","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban stormwater management increasingly relies on decentralized infiltration systems to mitigate the adverse effects of soil sealing. At the catchment scale, the hydrological impacts of such practices however remain poorly understood, especially in shallow aquifers settings where interactions between infiltrated volumes, groundwater and underground infrastructures can occur. This study examines the hydrological response of a small shallow groundwater urban area to the implementation of stormwater infiltration, based on numerical modeling. The influence of climate, soil conditions, hydrogeology, urban context, and infiltration strategy is assessed. Results show that the concentration of runoff within infiltration systems causes a large increase of groundwater recharge, often leading to water-table rise. Where initial groundwater depth or low subsurface transmissivity is low, seepage into sewer pipes and underground drainage structures increases and potentially undermines the runoff volume reduction benefits of infiltration systems. Occasionally, an increase in transpiration from green spaces may also occur. For remaining settings, the additional recharge is mainly dissipated by downstream groundwater flow, without generating notable interactions with the surface or underground structures. Overall, this study illustrates the variety of stormwater infiltration outcomes and demonstrates the inability of this strategy, alone, to restore pre-development hydrological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70092","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147653363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Reservoir Management on Surrounding Groundwater: Causality, Modeling, and Future Hypothetical Scenarios","authors":"Prayas Rath, Jianting Zhu, Kevin M. Befus","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70090","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the hydrologic connection between a surface water reservoir and surrounding groundwater under changing climate and water demand. Field research at the Wyoming Hereford Ranch Reservoir 2 (WHR2) combined Granger causality tests and MODFLOW modeling to examine temporal relationships and simulate groundwater responses. Causality weakened under wetter conditions due to an increase in recharge. A parsimonious MODFLOW model using reservoir levels as input accurately simulated groundwater levels (NSE: 0.65–0.98; RMSE: 0.09–0.3 m). Scenario analysis revealed minimal groundwater change (±0.5 m) under varying reservoir operations, indicating buffering capacity that supports adjacent wetlands. In contrast, dam removal caused a 2.5 m drop in groundwater near the dam, while changes in recharge affected more distant areas by up to 3 m. Higher recharge also reduced the range of groundwater fluctuations. These findings highlight the sensitivity of groundwater to recharge and reservoir dynamics and highlight the importance of adaptive reservoir management. The framework offers a transferable tool for evaluating reservoir impacts on groundwater under climate variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70090","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147323839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Md Shahabul Alam, Ryan Johnson, Savalan Naser Neisary, James Halgren, Steven Burian
{"title":"Model-Agnostic Framework for Evaluating Hydrological Models Under Extreme Events Across the Contiguous United States","authors":"Md Shahabul Alam, Ryan Johnson, Savalan Naser Neisary, James Halgren, Steven Burian","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70093","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increasing frequency of hydrological extremes highlights the need for event-based approaches to evaluate hydrological model performance and support water resource management. Traditional long-term continuous simulations often overlook model behavior during critical flood and drought periods, limiting their operational value. To address this gap, we developed a coupled SEED–CSES framework for large-sample, event-based benchmarking. SEED identifies flood and drought events using the Log-Pearson Type III (LP3) distribution for multiple return intervals (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 years), while CSES evaluates model skill. We demonstrate the framework by assessing the extreme-event prediction performance of the National Water Model (NWM) v3.0 at more than 7000 USGS NWIS stations, including over 600 CAMELS basins. Across the CONUS domain, NWM 3.0 shows higher skill for flood events (median KGE ≈0.20) than for drought events (median KGE ≈−0.78). Wetter eastern, southeastern, and northwestern regions perform better (median KGE ≈0.387), while arid western and southwestern regions show low performance (median KGE ≈−0.447), illustrating how event-based benchmarking reveals hydrological behaviors masked in long-term evaluations. The integrated SEED–CSES framework provides a standardized and automated platform for hydrological model assessment, supporting improved flood forecasting, drought monitoring, and climate resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70093","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147315620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}