Nicholas Chin, David Kaplan, Maitane Olabarrieta, Viyaktha Hithaishi Hewageegana, Luming Shi
{"title":"Quantifying the Effects of National Water Model Freshwater Flux Predictions on Estuarine Hydrodynamic Forecasts","authors":"Nicholas Chin, David Kaplan, Maitane Olabarrieta, Viyaktha Hithaishi Hewageegana, Luming Shi","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Accurate streamflow forecasts are critical for modeling and managing estuarine water quality, as freshwater fluxes significantly influence coastal dynamics. The National Water Model (NWM) provides high-resolution streamflow predictions, which are valuable for hydrodynamic modeling in poorly gauged coastal regions. However, inaccuracies in NWM forecasts can limit our ability to predict estuarine and nearshore water quality effectively. First, this study evaluates the accuracy of NWM predictions for 14 coastal reaches in southwest Florida's Charlotte Harbor and Caloosahatchee River estuaries from 2018 to 2024, where hydrologic management has impacted water quality. NWM forecasts showed varying bias and variance, with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies (NSE) ranging from −2.26 to 0.77. Next, hydrodynamic simulations for the flow-managed Caloosahatchee River Estuary (CRE) were performed using both NWM forecasts and observed streamflows, revealing that errors in NWM predictions during high-flow events caused significant deviations in the position of ecologically relevant isohalines, lasting weeks. Finally, to address these issues, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network was developed to bias-correct NWM forecasts, improving NSE from 0.41 to 0.53. However, the LSTM's inability to “learn” managed discharge schedules highlights the need for advanced data assimilation and simulation techniques in flow-managed coastal systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate streamflow forecasts are critical for modeling and managing estuarine water quality, as freshwater fluxes significantly influence coastal dynamics. The National Water Model (NWM) provides high-resolution streamflow predictions, which are valuable for hydrodynamic modeling in poorly gauged coastal regions. However, inaccuracies in NWM forecasts can limit our ability to predict estuarine and nearshore water quality effectively. First, this study evaluates the accuracy of NWM predictions for 14 coastal reaches in southwest Florida's Charlotte Harbor and Caloosahatchee River estuaries from 2018 to 2024, where hydrologic management has impacted water quality. NWM forecasts showed varying bias and variance, with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies (NSE) ranging from −2.26 to 0.77. Next, hydrodynamic simulations for the flow-managed Caloosahatchee River Estuary (CRE) were performed using both NWM forecasts and observed streamflows, revealing that errors in NWM predictions during high-flow events caused significant deviations in the position of ecologically relevant isohalines, lasting weeks. Finally, to address these issues, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network was developed to bias-correct NWM forecasts, improving NSE from 0.41 to 0.53. However, the LSTM's inability to “learn” managed discharge schedules highlights the need for advanced data assimilation and simulation techniques in flow-managed coastal systems.
期刊介绍:
JAWRA seeks to be the preeminent scholarly publication on multidisciplinary water resources issues. JAWRA papers present ideas derived from multiple disciplines woven together to give insight into a critical water issue, or are based primarily upon a single discipline with important applications to other disciplines. Papers often cover the topics of recent AWRA conferences such as riparian ecology, geographic information systems, adaptive management, and water policy.
JAWRA authors present work within their disciplinary fields to a broader audience. Our Associate Editors and reviewers reflect this diversity to ensure a knowledgeable and fair review of a broad range of topics. We particularly encourage submissions of papers which impart a ''take home message'' our readers can use.