发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Religion and Human Rights最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Religious Minorities and Freedom of Religion or Belief in the uk 英国的宗教少数派和宗教信仰自由
Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2018-03-27 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-13011160
Paul Weller
{"title":"Religious Minorities and Freedom of Religion or Belief in the uk","authors":"Paul Weller","doi":"10.1163/18710328-13011160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-13011160","url":null,"abstract":"By particular reference to the polity of the UK , this article discusses issues and options for groups identified as “religious minorities” in relation to issues of “religious freedom”. It does so by seeking to ensure that such contemporary socio-legal discussions are rooted empirically in the full diversity of the UK ’s contemporary religious landscape, while taking account of (especially) 19th century (mainly Christian) historical antecedents. It argues that properly to understand the expansion in scope and substance of religious freedom achieved in the 19th century that account needs to be taken of the agency of the groups that benefited from this. Finally, it argues this history can be seen as a “preconfiguration” of the way in which religious minorities have themselves acted as key drivers for change in relevant 20th and 21st century UK law and social policy and could continue to do so in possible futures post-Brexit Referendum.","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"PP 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126450073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Freedom of Religion and Belief in the United Kingdom 英国的宗教和信仰自由
Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2018-03-27 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-13011000
Ö. H. Çınar, J. Temperman
{"title":"Freedom of Religion and Belief in the United Kingdom","authors":"Ö. H. Çınar, J. Temperman","doi":"10.1163/18710328-13011000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-13011000","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127751004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Right to be Human: How Do Muslim Women Talk about Human Rights and Religious Freedoms in Britain? 做人的权利:英国穆斯林妇女如何谈论人权和宗教自由?
Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2018-03-27 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-13011172
Sariya Cheruvallil-Contractor
{"title":"The Right to be Human: How Do Muslim Women Talk about Human Rights and Religious Freedoms in Britain?","authors":"Sariya Cheruvallil-Contractor","doi":"10.1163/18710328-13011172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-13011172","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines existing literature and data from qualitative fieldwork with Muslim women in Britain to analyse their narratives of human rights and freedom, as they live within plural European contexts. In scared, securitised and polarised Europe, Muslim women have become visible markers of otherness. Each Muslim woman becomes a fulcrum upon which Western values and morality are measured against the “other”, its values, its beliefs and its choices. In exploring the implications of societal othering on Muslim women’s experiences of their human rights, this article concludes that in social contexts that are polemical, becoming the other dehumanises Muslim women who thus become ineligible for “human” rights. In such contexts, a human rights-based approach alone is insufficient to achieve “dignity and fairness” in society. In addition to human rights, societies need robust and rigorous dialogue so that societal differences become part of a new mediated plural reality.","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114962317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
25 Years of Freedom of Religion Jurisprudence since Kokkinakis 自Kokkinakis以来的25年宗教自由法学
Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2017-10-07 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12230001
M. Evans, T. Gunn, J. Temperman
{"title":"25 Years of Freedom of Religion Jurisprudence since Kokkinakis","authors":"M. Evans, T. Gunn, J. Temperman","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12230001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12230001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115936688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Expression of Religious Beliefs: In the Name of Pluralism, although Not Quite Religious 宗教信仰的表达:以多元主义的名义，尽管不完全是宗教的
Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2017-10-07 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231154
Agnés Callamard
{"title":"The Expression of Religious Beliefs: In the Name of Pluralism, although Not Quite Religious","authors":"Agnés Callamard","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12231154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231154","url":null,"abstract":"The 25 years’ jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the intersection between expression and religion reveals that three main ideas of religion have coexisted alongside each other, for many decades predating the current era. The jurisprudence also shows that the Court somehow accommodated (and justified) these different ideas through a focus on democratic pluralism (not religious pluralism), a conception of pluralism which makes religion (including in its diverse expressions) subservient to democratic principles.","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115125219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Typology of Dissent in Religion Cases in the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights 欧洲人权法院大庭宗教案件异议的类型学
Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2017-10-07 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231159
S. V. Bijsterveld
{"title":"A Typology of Dissent in Religion Cases in the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights","authors":"S. V. Bijsterveld","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12231159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231159","url":null,"abstract":"Dissenting opinions in European Court of Human Rights judgments are a familiar phenomenon. Nevertheless, they receive little or no systematic attention. This essay presents a typology of dissenting opinions in religion cases in the Grand Chamber of the European Court. It identifies patterns of dividing lines within Grand Chamber decisions in religion cases and discusses these patterns.","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116987682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Religious Symbols and State Regulation 宗教符号与国家法规
Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2017-10-07 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231155
D. Mcgoldrick
{"title":"Religious Symbols and State Regulation","authors":"D. Mcgoldrick","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12231155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231155","url":null,"abstract":"Religious symbols are historically significant and socially powerful. They have many forms and functions. Their legal regulation presents difficult challenges for courts, particularly international courts. This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights has approached the regulation of the regulation of religious symbols by national jurisdictions. It submits that the fundamental touchstone of the Court’s jurisprudence lies in its approach to secularism. It has accepted secularism as consistent with the values underpinning the Convention. This is a strategic and sensible approach. There are limits imposed by the prohibitions on discrimination and indoctrination. Beyond secularism there have been tentative steps towards a balancing / reasonable accommodation approach but the Court appreciates that the balances are difficult ones on which reasonable people, and even reasonable states, may legitimately disagree.","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127020023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Limitations on Freedom of Religion and Belief in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Quarter Century since Its Judgment in Kokkinakis v. Greece 欧洲人权法院自Kokkinakis诉希腊案判决以来的25年判例中对宗教和信仰自由的限制
Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2017-10-07 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231158
M. Hill, Katherine Y. Barnes
{"title":"Limitations on Freedom of Religion and Belief in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Quarter Century since Its Judgment in Kokkinakis v. Greece","authors":"M. Hill, Katherine Y. Barnes","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12231158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231158","url":null,"abstract":"The manifestation of religious beliefs under Article 9 the European Convention on Human Rights is not absolute but may be subject to prescribed limitations. This article discusses the nature and extent of those limitations, as interpreted in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights from its decision in Kokkinakis v. Greece up to the present. It contrasts the prescriptive text of the Article with its lose and inconsistent interpretation by the Court in Strasbourg. Particular attention is given to the criteria of “prescribed by law”, “necessary in a democratic society”, “public safety”, “public order, health or morals” and “the rights and freedoms of others”. It seeks to divine principles from the varied jurisprudence, particularly at its intersection with the Court’s illusory doctrine of margin of appreciation.","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"314 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123328687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Parental Rights in Relation to Denominational Schooling under the European Convention on Human Rights 《欧洲人权公约》规定的与教派教育有关的父母权利
Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2017-10-07 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231133
J. Temperman
{"title":"Parental Rights in Relation to Denominational Schooling under the European Convention on Human Rights","authors":"J. Temperman","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12231133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231133","url":null,"abstract":"Whereas the bulk of Article 2 Protocol I cases concerns aspects of the public-school framework and curriculum, this article explores Convention rights in the realm of denominational schooling. It is outlined that the jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court generally strongly supports the rights of parents not to send their child to state-organized schools and hence to establish or avail of private, denominational schooling instead. In this area of private schooling, the Strasbourg Court could build a stronger body of jurisprudence against discriminatory funding policies. The Court is right in seeing no state duty to fund denominational schools, but where intricate funding policies serve to privilege the state or dominant religion and their schools, at the disadvantage of minority religion schools, the Court should come into action.","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116285462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Freedom of Religion or Belief in the echr since Kokkinakis. Or “Quoting Kokkinakis” 自Kokkinakis以来，欧洲的宗教信仰自由。或者“引用Kokkinakis的话”
Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2017-10-07 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231166
M. Evans
{"title":"The Freedom of Religion or Belief in the echr since Kokkinakis. Or “Quoting Kokkinakis”","authors":"M. Evans","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12231166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231166","url":null,"abstract":"The Kokkinakis case is probably the most widely cited judgement of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the freedom of religion or belief. Yet the constant repetition of its key passages tends to obscure the very real, and controversial, developments which have taken place in the Court’s jurisprudence. This article outlines this practice and explores its implications. It concludes that “quoting Kokkinakis” runs the risk of have a negative impact upon our understanding of Article 9 of the ECHR today and its famous ‘mantra’ should be replaced by a more up to date and accurate statement of the conceptual underpinnings of that article.","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124014715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信