欧洲人权法院大庭宗教案件异议的类型学

Religion and Human Rights Pub Date : 2017-10-07 DOI:10.1163/18710328-12231159

S. V. Bijsterveld

{"title":"欧洲人权法院大庭宗教案件异议的类型学","authors":"S. V. Bijsterveld","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12231159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dissenting opinions in European Court of Human Rights judgments are a familiar phenomenon. Nevertheless, they receive little or no systematic attention. This essay presents a typology of dissenting opinions in religion cases in the Grand Chamber of the European Court. It identifies patterns of dividing lines within Grand Chamber decisions in religion cases and discusses these patterns.","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Typology of Dissent in Religion Cases in the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights\",\"authors\":\"S. V. Bijsterveld\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18710328-12231159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dissenting opinions in European Court of Human Rights judgments are a familiar phenomenon. Nevertheless, they receive little or no systematic attention. This essay presents a typology of dissenting opinions in religion cases in the Grand Chamber of the European Court. It identifies patterns of dividing lines within Grand Chamber decisions in religion cases and discusses these patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion and Human Rights\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion and Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲人权法院的判决中，反对意见是一个常见的现象。然而，他们很少或根本没有得到系统的关注。本文介绍了欧洲法院大法庭宗教案件中不同意见的类型学。它确定了大法庭在宗教案件中判决的分界线模式，并讨论了这些模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Typology of Dissent in Religion Cases in the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights

Dissenting opinions in European Court of Human Rights judgments are a familiar phenomenon. Nevertheless, they receive little or no systematic attention. This essay presents a typology of dissenting opinions in religion cases in the Grand Chamber of the European Court. It identifies patterns of dividing lines within Grand Chamber decisions in religion cases and discusses these patterns.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Religion and Human Rights

自引率

0.00%

发文量