Journal of OrthodonticsPub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-09DOI: 10.1177/14653125251358833
Minnie Lyons-Coleman, Claire Bates, Nicky Mandall, Paul Bassett
{"title":"The Spacing Index (TSI): A diagnostic classification for spaced dentitions.","authors":"Minnie Lyons-Coleman, Claire Bates, Nicky Mandall, Paul Bassett","doi":"10.1177/14653125251358833","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125251358833","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the validity and reliability of The Spacing Index (TSI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-centre diagnostic study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Orthodontic Department, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKMethods:TSI was outlined based on the principle of mild spacing (0-4 mm), moderate spacing (5-8 mm) and severe spacing (>8 mm). A total of 53 anonymised study models were selected as a convenience sample of patients attending hypodontia multidisciplinary clinics. A range of cases with different amounts of spacing in each arch was chosen. Each model was measured by ML-C in millimetres using calibrated Vernier callipers and then subdivided to give the gold standard spacing TSI categorisation of mild, moderate or severe. Two test raters (CB and NM) then visually assessed the same study models and rated the spacing as mild, moderate or severe. Comparison of the gold standard rating and the test rating was made to assess the validity of TSI. The reliability of the index was assessed by both the gold standard and test raters 2 weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted kappa score was 0.79 (substantial agreement) between the gold standard rater and the test raters for the mild, moderate and severe TSI categories. The weighted kappa scores were greater than 0.80, demonstrating almost perfect intra-observer reliability over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed TSI has been shown to be valid and reliable and could be used to categorise spacing during routine orthodontic assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"270-274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144804346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of OrthodonticsPub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-09-18DOI: 10.1177/14653125251345289
Minnie Lyons-Coleman
{"title":"Meet the Author.","authors":"Minnie Lyons-Coleman","doi":"10.1177/14653125251345289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125251345289","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"52 3","pages":"305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145081006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of OrthodonticsPub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-09-18DOI: 10.1177/14653125241306698
{"title":"Corrigendum to: Vertical and sagittal changes produced by an expander with differential opening versus a fan-type expander: A post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/14653125241306698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125241306698","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"52 3","pages":"NP1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145081043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of OrthodonticsPub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-01-15DOI: 10.1177/14653125241305149
Gilad Har-Zion
{"title":"A novel appliance for Class II dentoalveolar correction.","authors":"Gilad Har-Zion","doi":"10.1177/14653125241305149","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125241305149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, a segmental approach to Class II correction has gained popularity among orthodontists. This concept is best represented by the Carrière Motion 3D™ Class II Appliance (CMA), which is an efficient and effective appliance for the treatment of Class II malocclusions. Although it is original and innovative, it also has some inherent flaws that can potentially interfere with its daily use. A segmental approach is described, based on a section of 0.016 × 0.022-inch stainless steel archwire connected to a molar band distally and to a bracket on the mesial side. This simple alternative presents a 'do-it-yourself' and an easy-to-construct mechanism that employs the same principles and identical mechanics to achieve Class II correction yet overcomes most of the disadvantages of other modalities. In our clinic, we found that this optional, useful sectional appliance can correct Class II malocclusion effectively, predictively and on a regular basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"295-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of OrthodonticsPub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-09-02DOI: 10.1177/14653125251358832
Monique Nguyen, Dalya Al-Moghrabi, Lauren Tomlinson, Niloufar Azami, Calogero Dolce, Sarah Abu Arqub
{"title":"Early orthodontic treatment practices and perceptions: A cross-sectional survey of AAO members.","authors":"Monique Nguyen, Dalya Al-Moghrabi, Lauren Tomlinson, Niloufar Azami, Calogero Dolce, Sarah Abu Arqub","doi":"10.1177/14653125251358832","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125251358832","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore early treatment practices and perceptions among members of the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Members of the AAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic questionnaire was pre-piloted and circulated via email to members of the AAO. The survey questions covered respondent demographics, clinical experience, preferred timing of intervention, treatment approaches and clinicians' perceptions with regard to early interceptive treatment. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 228 responses were obtained (response rate = 5.12%). Treatment was commonly timed using dental age (61%) and pubertal signs (61.8%). Several problems were treated in the mid-mixed dentition phase (8-9 years) including posterior crossbite (51.3%) increased overjet (41.7%), crowding (39.5%), space loss (41.23%) and anterior open bite (37.3%). Commonly reported treatment approaches included the use of sectional fixed appliances for treatment of anterior crossbite (81.6%), rapid palatal expander for treatment of posterior crossbite (63.6%) and anterior bite plane for deep overbite correction (62.7%). Herbst appliance (42.1%) and facemask (89%) were commonly prescribed for early correction of Class II and III, respectively. Lingual and palatal arches were commonly used to preserve arch length. The majority of respondents (60.1%) were proponents of two-phase orthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early orthodontic treatment in the mid-mixed dentition stage was widely advocated for orthodontic intervention. Various malocclusions, including posterior and anterior crossbite, increased overjet, crowding, space loss and anterior open bite, were reported to be commonly addressed during this phase. Popular treatment approaches included sectional fixed appliances, Herbst appliance, facemask, rapid palatal expanders and anterior bite planes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"285-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144958073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of OrthodonticsPub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-06-21DOI: 10.1177/14653125251345288
{"title":"Continued Professional Development.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/14653125251345288","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125251345288","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"52 2","pages":"214-216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144340222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of OrthodonticsPub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-01-15DOI: 10.1177/14653125241304442
Kelly Smorthit, Simon Littlewood, Tara Maroke, Simon Pini, Sophy Barber
{"title":"Using photo-elicitation to explore young people's short-term experience of and adherence to orthodontic retainers.","authors":"Kelly Smorthit, Simon Littlewood, Tara Maroke, Simon Pini, Sophy Barber","doi":"10.1177/14653125241304442","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125241304442","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate young people's experience of retainer wear in the immediate term and at 6 months after appliance removal, and to explore the factors affecting retainer wear adherence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Orthodontic departments at two teaching hospitals in Yorkshire, UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 12 participants aged 13-18 years were recruited using a purposive sampling approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection occurred through one-to-one, virtual, photo-elicitation interviews at two time points (immediate and 6 months) with data analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching themes were developed to describe young people's experience of orthodontic retention: immediate experience and expectation of retainers; the process of adaptation; and motivating factors. Barriers to adherence were mostly ascribed to daytime wear, despite normalisation of retainers in young people's lives. Interventions to help individuals overcome the initial adaptation phase and self-manage their foreseen problems of forgetfulness include routines and reminders, which seem to be less important at 6 months. At both time points, internal and external motivation significantly contribute to retainer adherence, with compensatory changes in behaviour being more important at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding early experiences of retainer wear can help clinicians to provide timely and well-targeted interventions and information. Co-constructing unique adherence strategies may help to overcome the initial adaptation phase, with particular emphasis on understanding the individual.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"194-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177191/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Does enamel deproteinisation with 10% papain affect shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives? A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Vishal Sharma, Naval Bawaskar, Shweta Bhat, Rakesh Kontham, Harshal Chandorikar, Swapnil Ghodke","doi":"10.1177/14653125241279461","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125241279461","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of 10% papain as an enamel deproteinising agent on the shear bond strength (SBS) of three orthodontic adhesives: Transbond XT, resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and Biofix.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-centre, double-blinded, split-mouth randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Nair Hospital Dental College, Mumbai, India.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 20 participants, requiring bilateral premolar extraction for fixed orthodontic treatment in both the maxillary and mandibular arches, were included in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 80 premolars from the above-mentioned participants were divided into four groups as follows: group A: Transbond XT deproteinised with 10% papain gel; group B: Biofix deproteinised with 10% papain gel; group C: RMGIC deproteinised with 10% papain gel; and group D: Transbond XT without enamel deproteinisation as a control group-bonded as instructed by the manufacturer. After deproteinisation, brackets were bonded and after a follow-up period of 28 days, the teeth were extracted. The SBS was then measured using the Universal Testing Machine. The force needed to shear the bracket was documented, and bond strengths were subsequently calculated in megapascals (MPa). The obtained results were subjected to statistical analysis and one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the mean SBS between the groups. Subsequently, pairwise comparisons were conducted using Tukey's post hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference in SBS among all groups (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The SBS of TransXT with deproteinisation increased significantly compared with TransXT without deproteinisation (<i>P</i> = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the SBS of TransXT without deproteinisation and RMGIC (<i>P</i> = 0.47) and Biofix (<i>P</i> = 0.39), both with deproteinisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of 10% papain for deproteinising enamel improved the SBS of all materials. Deproteinising improved the SBS of RMGIC and Biofix to the level of TransXT without deproteinisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"183-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of OrthodonticsPub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2024-09-16DOI: 10.1177/14653125241268733
Sara Khan, Rozina Nazir, Maidah Hanif
{"title":"Multidisciplinary treatment of a patient with TMJ ankylosis and a severe dentofacial discrepancy: A case report.","authors":"Sara Khan, Rozina Nazir, Maidah Hanif","doi":"10.1177/14653125241268733","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125241268733","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis is a debilitating condition characterised by the fusion of bony or fibrous tissues in the TMJ, resulting in restricted mouth opening, functional challenges and facial deformities. This report highlights the complexity and multifaceted nature of TMJ ankylosis and emphasises the significance of early intervention and a multidisciplinary approach. Distraction osteogenesis has emerged as a successful method for managing TMJ ankylosis and associated facial asymmetry. Post-distraction orthodontic management is essential to address occlusal changes, including posterior open bite and crossbite.Diagnosis and treatment plan:A 17-year-old boy with unilateral right-sided TMJ ankylosis presented with restricted mouth opening, facial asymmetry and functional difficulties. Multidisciplinary treatment planning involved distraction osteogenesis, condylectomy, coronoidectomy and orthodontic correction to improve the occlusion and facial aesthetics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment significantly improved facial aesthetics, mouth opening, occlusion and the patient's confidence and self-esteem.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case report underscores the complexity of TMJ ankylosis and the need for a comprehensive approach, including surgical and orthodontic interventions. Collaboration among healthcare professionals and ongoing research is vital to refine treatment approaches and improve the quality of life for patients with TMJ ankylosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"133-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of OrthodonticsPub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-03-03DOI: 10.1177/14653125251319985
{"title":"Erratum to: A Systematic Review a Day, Keeps the Reader Away!","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/14653125251319985","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125251319985","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"NP1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143542291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}