Journal of Orthodontics最新文献

{"title":"A four-year review of orthodontic cases appearing before the General Dental Council Professional Conduct Committee.","authors":"Zahid Ahmad, Parmjit Singh","doi":"10.1177/1465312520954219","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1465312520954219","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the characteristics of orthodontic cases at the General Dental Council's (GDC) Professional Conduct Committee (PCC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Review of data from the GDC website for orthodontically related hearings or those involving orthodontic treatment providers during 2015-2018.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Observational descriptive study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were accessed from the GDC website by a single researcher to retrieve orthodontic cases. The press office of the GDC was contacted to ensure all data were captured. For each case that met the inclusion criteria, demographic details of the registrant, the charges proved/not proved and final outcome of the case were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 registrant cases involved orthodontics and this was 8% of the total number of PCC hearings during 2015-2018. Nine (39%) of the registrants had a Membership in Orthodontics qualification although only 7 (30%) were registered as orthodontists on the UK GDC Specialist List in Orthodontics. Charges related to clinical assessment, consent and record keeping were mostly proved for dentists (13/16 hearings for each) whereas a poor standard of treatment and not cooperating with the GDC were mostly proved for orthodontists (4/7 hearings for each). Overall, conditions were imposed in 10 (44%) cases, erasure in 7 (30%) cases, suspension in 5 (22%) cases and a reprimand in 1 (4%) case.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GDC continue to view misdemeanours seriously and it would be prudent for registrants to be familiar with the nature of these hearings to reduce the risk of finding themselves in such a predicament.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"391-399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38380948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Editorial.","authors":"Jayne Harrison","doi":"10.1177/14653125231211405","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125231211405","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"50 4","pages":"333-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138470441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Meet the Author.","authors":"Othman Hameed","doi":"10.1177/14653125231211407","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125231211407","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"50 4","pages":"449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138470442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Republication of Inaugural Editorial, <i>British Journal of Orthodontics</i>.","authors":"J R E Mills","doi":"10.1177/14653125231222685","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125231222685","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"50 1_suppl","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139697716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Diversity of authors in the <i>British Journal of Orthodontics</i> and <i>Journal of Orthodontics</i> over the last 50 years.","authors":"Jayne E Harrison","doi":"10.1177/14653125231215832","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125231215832","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore any changes in the perceived gender and affiliation of first authors of papers published in the <i>British Journal of Orthodontics (BJO)</i> and <i>Journal of Orthodontics (JO)</i>, over the last 50 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic hand searches of the <i>BJO and JO</i> from 1973 to 2021, were undertaken to identify research and clinical papers published the first volume of the BJO (1973-74) and then the first two volumes of each subsequent decade i.e. 1980-81; 1990-91 to 2020-21. Articles such as Editorials, Product Updates and Abstract summaries, were excluded.The perceived gender of the first author was identified from their forename, internet sources and/or personal knowledge, where possible. The country of the first author's affiliation was identified from the author details stated in the papers. The countries were then grouped into geographical areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 385 papers were identified with a steady increase from 1973 to 2021. There was a statistically significant increase in papers published by authors who were perceived to be female (odds ratio 8.33; 95% CI 4.75, 14.64). The increase in papers published by non-UK affiliated first authors was significant (odds ratio 5.01; 95% CI 2.78, 9.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The <i>Journal</i> has seen a significant change, over the last 50 years, in its authorship profile from nearly exclusively male, UK based authors to more than 60% of published papers having a first author who was perceived as being female and 37% originating from outside the UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"50 1_suppl","pages":"15-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139697712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"British Orthodontic Society UTG session 2023.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/14653125231211408","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125231211408","url":null,"abstract":"s of presentations at the British Orthodontic Conference on 28th September 2023 in London. These highlight the range and quality of research undertaken by UK orthodontic specialty trainees.","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"50 4","pages":"453-456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138470439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An artificial neural network approach for rational decision-making in borderline orthodontic cases: A preliminary analytical observational in silico study.","authors":"Shanya Kapoor, Tarulatha R Shyagali, Amit Kuraria, Abhishek Gupta, Anil Tiwari, Payal Goyal","doi":"10.1177/14653125231172527","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125231172527","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has transformed the way healthcare functions in the present scenario. In orthodontics, expert systems and machine learning have aided clinicians in making complex, multifactorial decisions. One such scenario is an extraction decision in a borderline case.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present in silico study was planned with the intention of building an AI model for extraction decisions in borderline orthodontic cases.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational analytical study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Orthodontics, Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital, Madhya Pradesh Medical University, Jabalpur, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An artificial neural network (ANN) model for extraction or non-extraction decisions in borderline orthodontic cases was constructed based on a supervised learning algorithm using the Python (version 3.9) Sci-Kit Learn library and feed-forward backpropagation method. Based on 40 borderline orthodontic cases, 20 experienced clinicians were asked to recommend extraction or non-extraction treatment. The decision of the orthodontist and the diagnostic records, including the selected extraoral and intra-oral features, model analysis and cephalometric analysis parameters, constituted the training dataset of AI. The built-in model was then tested using a testing dataset of 20 borderline cases. After running the model on the testing dataset, the accuracy, F1 score, precision and recall were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present AI model showed an accuracy of 97.97% for extraction and non-extraction decision-making. The receiver operating curve (ROC) and cumulative accuracy profile showed a near-perfect model with precision, recall and F1 values of 0.80, 0.84 and 0.82 for non-extraction decisions and 0.90, 0.87 and 0.88 for extraction decisions.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>As the present study was preliminary in nature, the dataset included was too small and population-specific.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present AI model gave accurate results in decision-making capabilities related to extraction and non-extraction treatment modalities in borderline orthodontic cases of the present population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"439-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9418934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Orthodontic clinicians' attitudes and knowledge of dentogingival aesthetics: A cross-sectional survey of BOS members.","authors":"Eman Ajrash, Andrew T DiBiase, Nikolaos Pandis, Martyn T Cobourne, Jadbinder Seehra","doi":"10.1177/14653125211034878","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125211034878","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess orthodontic clinicians' knowledge and attitudes towards dentogingival aesthetics and to explore characteristics that predict the knowledge of dentogingival aesthetics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>On-line survey of members of the British Orthdontic Society.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An 11-item online questionnaire was sent to orthodontic practitioners for completion. The questionnaire covered respondent demographics and questions relating to both knowledge and attitudes towards dentogingival aesthetics (six parameters). Descriptive statistics were calculated for study characteristics and summary values for the survey items. Responses to the eight knowledge-based questions were converted to a binary outcome (correct and incorrect answer). The maximum score that could be achieved was eight. Multivariable modelling was used in order to examine associations between the study characteristics and the aggregate score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 252 responses were obtained resulting in a response rate of 17%. Within this cohort, the respondents were primarily women (52.8%) and aged 30-40 years (35.7%). The mean score for the eight knowledge-based questions was 3.8 ± 1.8 (range = 0-8). Knowledge of the ideal gingival margin position of the anterior teeth was high (92.4%). Knowledge of the other five dentogingival aesthetic parameters was variable. In the multivariable analysis, lower knowledge scores were predicated by respondents who did not have a special interest in dental aesthetics (-0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.01 to -0.07; <i>P</i> = 0.02), who could not recall attending courses, lectures or seminars on dental aesthetics in the past five years (-0.80; 95% CI = -1.43 to -0.17; <i>P</i> = 0.01) and with increasing age (-0.43; 95% CI = -0.62 to -0.23; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowledge of ideal dentogingival parameters is generally suboptimal among orthodontists in the UK. The reported lack of knowledge of the ideal dentogingival parameters may also influence respondents' attitudes towards the importance of dentogingival aesthetics. Further teaching or courses related to dentogingival aesthetics is desired by orthodontic clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"400-409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39299836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fifty years of the <i>British</i> / <i>Journal of Orthodontics</i>.","authors":"Philip E Benson","doi":"10.1177/14653125231215834","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125231215834","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is 50 years since publication of the first volume of the <i>British Journal of Orthodontics</i> (<i>BJO</i>). Now known as the <i>Journal of Orthodontics</i> (<i>JO</i>), the official journal of the British Orthodontic Society strives to published high quality, evidence-based research.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the content of articles published by the <i>BJO</i> in 1973-1974 with those in the <i>JO</i> in 2022-2023 to identify any changes over 50 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>BJO</i> volume 1 issues 1-5 and <i>JO</i> volume 49 issues 2-4 and volume 50 issues 1-2 were hand-searched and full articles obtained. Some articles were excluded. The included reports were assessed using objective criteria (see Supplemental materials).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar proportions of articles reporting the results of studies collecting data directly from participants of orthodontic interest were published (<i>BJO</i>: n = 12, 26%; <i>JO</i>: n = 15, 23%); however, there was an increase in the proportion of articles reporting studies that collected data from a non-orthodontic patient sample (<i>BJO</i>: n = 5, 11%; <i>JO</i>: n = 15, 23%). There was also an increase in the reporting of prospective data collection (<i>BJO</i>: n = 1; 6%; <i>JO</i>: n = 23, 79%), but much of this research was cross-sectional (<i>BJO</i>: n = 8, 50%; <i>JO</i>: n = 20, 69%), using convenience sampling (<i>BJO</i>: n = 13, 81%; <i>JO</i>: n = 23, 79% of articles reporting the results of data collected from human participants). Most research was non-experimental (<i>BJO</i>: n = 16, 100%; <i>JO</i>: n = 26, 90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some similarities in the types of reports published were found, as well as some encouraging differences. Decreasing retrospective data reports and increasing prospective data reports is welcome, but many are still non-experimental and cross-sectional. There is a need to publish more longitudinal, experimental clinical data to enhance knowledge and understanding of the effects of orthodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"50 1_suppl","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139697714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Finite element analysis of two skeletally anchored maxillary molar distalisation methods.","authors":"Lorena Vilanova, Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira, Mayara Paim Patel, Roberto Grec, José Fernando Castanha Henriques, Guilherme Janson, Daniela Garib, Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo","doi":"10.1177/14653125231166437","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125231166437","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare two methods of maxillary molar distalisation with skeletal anchorage using finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two digitised models were created: the miniscrew-anchored distaliser, which consisted of a distalisation method anchored in a buccal miniscrew between the first molar and second premolar (Model 1), and the miniscrew-anchored palatal appliance, which consisted of a distalisation method anchored in a miniscrew on the anterior region of the palate (Model 2). FEA was used to simulate both methods, assessing teeth displacements and stress concentration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The miniscrew-anchored distaliser showed greater buccal than distal displacement of the first molar, while the opposite was observed in the miniscrew-anchored palatal appliance. The second molar responded similarly in the transverse and anteroposterior perspectives with both appliances. Greater displacements were observed at crown level than in apical regions. Greater stress concentration was observed at the buccal and cervical regions of the crown in the miniscrew-anchored distaliser and the palatal and cervical regions in the palatal appliance. The stress progressively spread in the buccal side of the alveolar bone for the miniscrew-anchored distaliser and in the palatal root and alveolar bone for the palatal appliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FEA assumes that both appliances would promote maxillary molar distalisation. A skeletally anchored palatal distalisation force seems to provide a greater molar bodily movement with less undesirable effects. Greater stress is expected at the crown and cervical regions during distalisation, and the stress concentration in the roots and alveolar bone depends directly on the region the force was applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"344-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9659216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}