Research for All最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Co-producing artistic approaches to social cohesion 共同生产的艺术方法,以社会凝聚力
Research for All Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI: 10.14324/RFA.04.2.09
Katy Goldstraw, A. McMillan, H. Mort, Kate Pahl, Steve Pool, Zahir Rafiq, Zanib Rasool
{"title":"Co-producing artistic approaches to social cohesion","authors":"Katy Goldstraw, A. McMillan, H. Mort, Kate Pahl, Steve Pool, Zahir Rafiq, Zanib Rasool","doi":"10.14324/RFA.04.2.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.04.2.09","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This paper examines the potential of co-produced arts-based methodologies through the lens of a social cohesion project, from the perspectives of five artists. Arts methodologies can be useful in working across different disciplines and across university and community boundaries to create equitable knowledge production processes. The ways in which art is used in community settings as a mode of collaboration are explored, using the reflections from five artists who were involved in the social cohesion project together. This paper argues that co-producing artistic approaches to social cohesion is a complex, multilayered and sometimes fragile process, but that recognizing and discussing understandings of the role of power and voice within co-produced projects enables effective team communication.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134057873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Participating in a community-based participatory research module: A reflective inquiry 参与以社区为基础的参与性研究模块:反思性调查
Research for All Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI: 10.14324/RFA.04.2.10
R. Hally, Aisling Murphy, J. O'Connell, S. Robinson, Katarzyna Pyrz, Kenneth Burns, Catherine O’Mahony
{"title":"Participating in a community-based participatory research module: A reflective inquiry","authors":"R. Hally, Aisling Murphy, J. O'Connell, S. Robinson, Katarzyna Pyrz, Kenneth Burns, Catherine O’Mahony","doi":"10.14324/RFA.04.2.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.04.2.10","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This commentary piece, using a narrative inquiry frame, explores the experiences of five individuals who came together to participate in a community-based participatory research (CBPR) module. Owing to the short time frame of this accredited module, when the module was live, a particular focus was directed towards dialogical techniques to build trust and respect within the group and subsequently generate potential research questions. The inaugural experience of collaborating on a CBPR module stimulated unique feelings, reflections and learnings for participants, many of which took time to surface. This article aims to make sense of those experiences to support those wishing to engage in CBPR initiatives.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124945223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
How do we know what works? Evaluating data on the extent and impact of young people’s involvement in English health research 我们怎么知道什么是有效的?评估青少年参与英国健康研究的程度和影响的数据
Research for All Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI: 10.14324/RFA.04.2.05
L. Brady, J. Preston
{"title":"How do we know what works? Evaluating data on the extent and impact of young people’s involvement in English health research","authors":"L. Brady, J. Preston","doi":"10.14324/RFA.04.2.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.04.2.05","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The case for children and young people’s involvement in health research has been well documented, but less attention has been paid to the experiences and impact of involving children and young people rather than adults. This paper explores these issues in relation to a project undertaken for the James Lind Initiative on the availability, quality and reliability of existing data on young people’s involvement in studies supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The project found that there was no systematic way of getting reliable and comparable information about which young people are involved in health research in England, what form that involvement may have taken or the impacts of involvement. There is a need to better collate and disseminate evidence on young people’s involvement in research, using both existing systems and processes, and the possible development of new metrics and measures. Not having this information risks children and young people’s involvement continuing to develop in a piecemeal fashion. Further research is needed about how, when and where children and young people are involved in health research, and about the impact of involvement on research and on the children and young people involved.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125536332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Editorial: Engagement in a time of great change 社论:大变革时代的参与
Research for All Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI: 10.14324/RFA.04.2.01
S. Duncan, S. Oliver
{"title":"Editorial: Engagement in a time of great change","authors":"S. Duncan, S. Oliver","doi":"10.14324/RFA.04.2.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.04.2.01","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126723750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Enabling participation of Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) and seldom-heard communities in health research: A case study from the SCAMP adolescent cohort study 促进黑人和少数民族(BME)和很少听到的社区参与健康研究:来自SCAMP青少年队列研究的案例研究
Research for All Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI: 10.14324/RFA.04.2.06
Jane Bruton, Kathryn J. Jones, R. Jenkins, B. Davies, H. Ward, M. Toledano
{"title":"Enabling participation of Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) and seldom-heard communities in health research: A case study from the SCAMP adolescent cohort study","authors":"Jane Bruton, Kathryn J. Jones, R. Jenkins, B. Davies, H. Ward, M. Toledano","doi":"10.14324/RFA.04.2.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.04.2.06","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Our inquiry investigated the barriers to, and facilitators for, the involvement of Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) and ‘seldom-heard’ communities, in a study researching the impact of mobile phone and wireless device usage on adolescents’ cognition, behaviour and mental health. The aim was to co-produce solutions to increase participation, and we used focus groups, telephone interviews, a community event and a public and patient involvement (PPI) café to conduct the inquiry. Five themes emerged from the data: two enablers – the value and benefits of research; and three barriers – concerns about research and about communication, and practical constraints. A central cross-cutting theme, the concept of trust, was evident from the data, and extended across all themes, including across the solutions to non-participation. When the data collection and analysis were completed, we ran a symposium for researchers and members of the public to share our findings and to co-produce solutions. The symposium generated ideas about improving participation, including tailoring participant information, engaging with local advocates and involving people in research design and delivery.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127161861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Research, #Huh? Improving research awareness in NHS Grampian through a website and more 研究中,#啊?通过网站等提高格兰扁区NHS的研究意识
Research for All Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI: 10.14324/RFA.04.2.04
E. Berry, Mariella D’Alessandro
{"title":"Research, #Huh? Improving research awareness in NHS Grampian through a website and more","authors":"E. Berry, Mariella D’Alessandro","doi":"10.14324/RFA.04.2.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.04.2.04","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Our public-facing website #Huh (Helping U Help) – www.grampianclinicalresearch.com – has been designed to engage public, patients and staff in clinical research. We have included views from patients and the public in its design and content, using multiple methods to gather feedback, some proving more successful than others. This article presents how our website was developed, including the different methods we used to gather views from the patients and public before, during and after its development. We hope that this paper will give useful insights to other people interested in incorporating stakeholder feedback into their own work.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125213273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Evidence Cafés: Overcoming conflicting motivations and timings 证据:克服相互冲突的动机和时间
Research for All Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI: 10.14324/RFA.04.2.07
Gill Clough, A. Adams
{"title":"Evidence Cafés: Overcoming conflicting motivations and timings","authors":"Gill Clough, A. Adams","doi":"10.14324/RFA.04.2.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.04.2.07","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Evidence-based practice is increasingly important in creating effective public services through the balance of high-quality research and valid practice. Yet even when academics and practitioners work together to use evidence in practice, barriers emerge. This paper describes research into equitable knowledge exchange between academia and practice, drawing on data from 15 Evidence Cafés run across the UK with police forces, involving 378 participants, represented here with three exemplar Evidence Café case studies. Our findings reveal the differences between one-way knowledge transfer and two-way, equitable knowledge exchange, and how champions and effectively designed and implemented discussion objects can overcome challenges of conflicting motivations and timing. We conclude that there is a need to reframe knowledge exchange through the lens of ‘evidence’ and the process of equitable co-creation of new meanings.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123813303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Foregrounding co-production: Building research relationships in university–community collaborative research 前景合作生产:在大学-社区合作研究中建立研究关系
Research for All Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI: 10.14324/rfa.04.2.08
Nathan Eisenstadt, J. McLellan
{"title":"Foregrounding co-production: Building research relationships in university–community collaborative research","authors":"Nathan Eisenstadt, J. McLellan","doi":"10.14324/rfa.04.2.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14324/rfa.04.2.08","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Emerging scholarship on university–community co-production rightly emphasizes the importance of preparatory work to build research partnerships. Such preparation creates the necessary common ground on which to build a meaningful collaborative relationship. Drawing on our experiences on a large university–community co-production experiment in historical mapping, we argue that this work is particularly important in partnerships where relationships are characterized by difference. If academics wish to work with individuals and groups beyond the bounds of those with whom they already agree, ‘foregrounding’ co-production is a critical component. We identify three dimensions of foregrounding co-production: practical, epistemological and affective. Each become increasingly important in cases where communities lack trust in, or actively mistrust, the university. Understanding and navigating difference, historical harm and power asymmetries can be time-intensive, and it may require a reorientation of the relationship between process and output in collaborative projects such that initially intended aims are not met. In order to encourage co-production across difference, we conclude that foregrounding should be valued as an end or ‘output’ in and of itself.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132877877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Mind the gap: Can a professional development programme build a university’s public engagement community? 注意差距:专业发展项目能建立大学的公众参与社区吗?
Research for All Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI: 10.14324/RFA.04.2.11
Amy Seakins, Alexandra Fitzsimmons
{"title":"Mind the gap: Can a professional development programme build a university’s public engagement community?","authors":"Amy Seakins, Alexandra Fitzsimmons","doi":"10.14324/RFA.04.2.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.04.2.11","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000A number of ‘gaps’ may be present within public engagement with research – disparity of skills, priorities and knowledge between research staff and engagement practitioners, as well as differences between institutional ambition and departmental reality. Such gaps are often perceived as problems – deficits to be addressed through training and culture change initiatives. The design and delivery of Imperial College London’s Engagement Academy with 12 members of research, teaching and professional services staff sought to explore and work across such gaps. We propose that these areas of disconnect within and across universities may be challenging, but they may also be structurally necessary, and potentially even a source of rich public engagement.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129330366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Reflections from the field: Researchers’ experiences of co-production 实地反思:研究者的合作经验
Research for All Pub Date : 2020-05-05 DOI: 10.14324/rfa.04.2.03
J. Barke, Helen Thomas-Hughes, Marilyn Howard
{"title":"Reflections from the field: Researchers’ experiences of co-production","authors":"J. Barke, Helen Thomas-Hughes, Marilyn Howard","doi":"10.14324/rfa.04.2.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14324/rfa.04.2.03","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This paper draws on conversations between a group of research associates who worked on a large-scale co-produced research project, Productive Margins: Regulating for Engagement. Through our conversations and subsequent analysis, three themes emerged regarding our experiences working on the project: (1) Working across difference; (2) Engaging with arts practice; and (3) Creating the conditions for co-production. This paper reflects on these themes, and we suggest that there is a need to focus on and explore the processes of co-producing research in terms of pragmatics and epistemology.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127832962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信