Journal of neurosurgery. Spine最新文献

{"title":"The impact of lower thoracic versus upper lumbar upper instrumented vertebra in minimally invasive correction of adult spinal deformity.","authors":"Robert K Eastlack, Jay I Kumar, Gregory M Mundis, Pierce D Nunley, Juan S Uribe, Paul J Park, Stacie Tran, Michael Y Wang, Khoi D Than, David O Okonkwo, Adam S Kanter, Neel Anand, Richard G Fessler, Kai-Ming G Fu, Dean Chou, Praveen V Mummaneni","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE231335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE231335","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to compare the impact of using a lower thoracic (LT) versus upper lumbar (UL) level as the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) on clinical and radiographic outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective study design was used. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, and one of the following: coronal Cobb angle > 20°, sagittal vertical axis > 50 mm, pelvic tilt > 20°, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch > 10°. Patients were treated with circumferential or hybrid minimally invasive techniques at ≥ 3 spinal levels and had a 2-year minimum follow-up. They were then divided into 2 groups depending on whether the UIV was in the UL region, defined as a UIV location of L1-2, or the LT region, defined as T10-12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 of 223 patients met the inclusion criteria (68 LT and 46 UL). The UL group was older (67.5 vs 62.3 years; p = 0.015). Preoperative spinopelvic parameters were similar, except for sacral slope, which was higher in the UL group (30.5° vs 26.5°; p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with fixation crossing the lumbosacral junction was also similar (70.6% vs 67.4%; p = 0.717). Postoperative lumbar lordosis (42.5° vs 35.5°; p = 0.01) and change in coronal Cobb angle (-23.2° vs -9.6°; p < 0.001) were greater in the LT group, but other changes in postoperative spinopelvic parameters and changes in health-related quality-of-life scores were similar between groups. Reoperation rates were lower in the UL group (17.4% vs 36.8%; p = 0.025), largely associated with fewer radiographic failures (UL = 10.9% vs LT = 26.5%; p = 0.042); however, overall complication rates were not significantly different (UL = 43.5% vs LT = 60.3%; p = 0.077).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selecting a UL vertebra for UIV in minimally invasive surgical correction of adult spinal deformity results in lower reoperation rates compared to extending fixation to the LT region. This choice also correlates with shorter operating room times and reduced estimated blood loss. Although extending fixation to the LT region is associated with slightly greater lumbar lordosis and a greater change in the coronal Cobb angle, clinical outcomes were similar between the LT and UL groups for UIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142962192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Awake, endoscopic lumbar interbody spinal fusion: 10 years of experience with the first 400 cases.","authors":"Michael Y Wang, Jay Grossman","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.SPINE2431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.SPINE2431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Awake, endoscopic spinal fusion has been utilized as an ultra-minimally invasive surgery technique to accomplish the goals of spinal fixation, fusion, and disc height restoration. While many techniques exist for this approach, this series represents a single institution's experience with a large cohort and the evolution of this method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of a consecutive series of 400 patients treated over a 10-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Endoscopic decompression, expandable intervertebral spacer deployment, and percutaneous screws were combined with liposomal bupivacaine to allow for the surgery to be performed without general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA) in the vast majority of cases. Clinical and radiographic postoperative results were reviewed with special attention to surgical complications, in particular dorsal root ganglion (DRG) irritation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients underwent surgery successfully without conversion to an open operation. Their mean age was 69.1 ± 10.4 years, and 42% of the patients were male. A total of 509 levels were fused, with the most common indication being spondylolisthesis (67.5%). The mean operative time was 84.6 ± 31.4 minutes, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 98 ± 63 ml, and the mean hospital length of stay was 1.93 ± 1.1 nights. Overall, 4.3% of the patients underwent planned GETA due to comorbidities, and 2% were converted to GETA intraoperatively. Eighty percent of the patients experienced > 75% improvement in leg pain, and 52% experienced > 75% improvement in axial back pain. Complications included transient DRG irritation (23%), adjacent-level disease requiring reoperation (3.5%), inadequate decompression (2.3%), and nonunion (1.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This large case series demonstrates that awake, endoscopic spinal fusion is a viable option with acceptable clinical and radiographic results in a select patient population. Meticulous attention to detail is required to limit the rate of DRG irritation, achieve interbody height restoration, and mitigate nonunions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142962179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The recovery trajectory of patient-reported outcomes in elderly patients with frailty undergoing lumbar spine fusion: a propensity score-matching analysis.","authors":"Peng Cui, Qingyang Huang, Peng Wang, Chao Kong, Shibao Lu","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.SPINE24858","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.SPINE24858","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the complicated relationship between frailty, perioperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in elderly patients (≥ 75 years old) undergoing lumbar spine fusion (LSF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent LSF between March 2019 and December 2021 were recruited in this study. Frail patients (modified frailty index [mFI] score ≥ 2) were propensity score matched to nonfrail patients (mFI score 0-1) on the basis of age, sex, and the number of fused levels. Perioperative complications were collected and assessed according to the comprehensive complication index. Subgroups were further subdivided on the basis of the presence of major complications. The data from SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and North American Spine Society Satisfaction Questionnaire (NASS) at baseline and 1- and 2-year follow-up evaluations were compared between groups. Furthermore, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rate was also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 631 patients: 344 in the frail group and 287 in the nonfrail group. Frail patients were older (79.7 ± 5.1 years vs 76.4 ± 4.8 years, p < 0.001), with a higher proportion of females (68.9% vs 57.8%, p = 0.004) and those with malnutrition (17.7% vs 11.1%, p = 0.020). After propensity score matching for age, sex, and number of fused levels, 402 patients (201 in each group) were analyzed. Frail patients were more prone to have delirium (7.5% vs 3.0%, p = 0.044), blood transfusion (43.3% vs 30.3%, p = 0.007), and surgical site infection (6.0% vs 2.0%, p = 0.041). In addition, frail patients had a higher proportion of major complications (29.4% vs 16.9%, p = 0.003). Although they had worse PROs at baseline, frail patients obtained higher mean improvements and higher rates of MCID achievement by the 1- and 2-year follow-up evaluations than their nonfrail counterparts. Major complications did not seem to affect PROs in frail and nonfrail patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite being associated with worse baseline PROs, frail patients gained greater mean improvement in PROs and higher rates of MCID achievement by the 1- and 2-year follow-up evaluations than nonfrail patients. In addition, the presence of major complications did not affect PROs at the 1- and 2-year follow-ups. Although associated with major complications, elderly patients with frailty could benefit from LSF.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The gap between surgeon goal and achieved sagittal alignment in adult cervical spine deformity surgery.","authors":"Justin S Smith, David Ben-Israel, Michael P Kelly, Virginie Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Eric O Klineberg, Han Jo Kim, Breton Line, Themistocles S Protopsaltis, Peter Passias, Robert K Eastlack, Gregory M Mundis, K Daniel Riew, Khaled Kebaish, Paul Park, Munish C Gupta, Jeffrey L Gum, Alan H Daniels, Bassel G Diebo, Richard Hostin, Justin K Scheer, Alex Soroceanu, D Kojo Hamilton, Thomas J Buell, Stephen J Lewis, Lawrence G Lenke, Jeffrey P Mullin, Frank J Schwab, Douglas Burton, Christopher I Shaffrey, Christopher P Ames, Shay Bess","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24703","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Malalignment following cervical spine deformity (CSD) surgery can negatively impact outcomes and increase complications. Despite the growing ability to plan alignment, it remains unclear whether preoperative goals are achieved with surgery. The objective of this study was to assess how good surgeons are at achieving their preoperative goal alignment following CSD surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with CSD were prospectively enrolled into a multicenter registry. Surgeons documented alignment goals prior to surgery, including C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2-7 sagittal Cobb angle, T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS-CL), and C7-S1 SVA. Goals were compared with achieved alignment, and the offsets (achieved goal) were calculated. General linear models were created for offset magnitude for each alignment parameter, controlling for baseline deformity and surgical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 88 enrolled patients had a mean age of 63.6 ± 13.0 years. The mean number of anterior and posterior instrumented levels was 3.5 ± 1.0 and 10.6 ± 4.5, respectively. Surgeons failed to achieve their preoperative alignment goals by an average of 17.2 (range 0.1-75.4) mm for C2-7 SVA, 10.3° (range 0.1°-45.5°) for C2-7 sagittal Cobb angle, 15.6° (range 0.0°-42.9°) for TS-CL, and 34.2 (range 0.3-113.7) mm for C7-S1 SVA. The sagittal alignment parameters with the highest rate of extreme outliers were TS-CL and C7-S1 SVA, with 32.2% exceeding 20° and 60.8% exceeding 20 mm from goal alignment, respectively. After controlling for baseline deformity and operative parameters, the only factor associated with achieving targeted alignment for C2-7 sagittal Cobb angle was greater baseline thoracic kyphosis (TK; B = -0.148, 95% CI -0.288 to -0.007, p = 0.040), and for TS-CL, the only associated factor was lower baseline TS-CL (B = 0.187, 95% CI 0.027-0.347, p = 0.022). Both lower TK and greater TS-CL may reflect increased baseline deformity through greater thoracic compensation and increased TS-CL mismatch, respectively. No significant associations were identified for C2-7 SVA and C7-S1 SVA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons failed to achieve their preoperative alignment goals by an average of 17.2 mm for C2-7 SVA, 10.3° for C2-7 sagittal Cobb angle, 15.6° for TS-CL, and 34.2 mm for C7-S1 SVA. The few factors identified that were associated with offset between goal and achieved alignment suggest that achievement of goal alignment was most challenging for more severe deformities. Further advancements are needed to enable more consistent translation of preoperative alignment goals into the operating room for adult CSD correction. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01588054 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Advances in neurosurgical education: literature review of mixed-reality simulation models and novel mixed-reality spine prototype.","authors":"Juan P Giraldo, Steve S Cho, Nafis B Eghrari, Nikhil Dholaria, S Harrison Farber, Ryan B Ehredt, Chinami Michaels, Demos J Fotias, Jakub Godzik, Volker K H Sonntag, Juan S Uribe","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mixed-reality (MR) applications provide opportunities for technical rehearsal, education, and estimation of surgical performance without the risk of patient harm. In this study, the authors provide a structured literature review on the current state of MR applications and their effects on neurosurgery training. They also introduce an MR prototype for neurosurgical spine training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive review of the literature based on MR, education, and neurosurgery was performed using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases from January 1, 2013, to October 5, 2023. The terms used for the search included \"augmented reality,\" \"mixed reality,\" \"education,\" \"neurosurgery,\" and \"neurosurgical procedures.\" After evaluating the results in the literature, the authors designed an MR prototype to investigate the use of 3D models, haptic feedback, and virtual reality (VR) in an educational module for freehand pedicle screw placement training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1089 articles found in the databases, 111 duplicate articles were removed, and 978 articles were screened for MR and neurosurgery. Forty articles were selected to explore the relationship between MR environments and neurosurgery. Of these, 25 described cranial MR use, 13 described spine MR use, and 2 described cranial and spine MR training and education modules. The structured review exposed the relationships between MR environments in neurosurgical education, procedures, functional outcomes, novel technologies, and medical training limitations. These studies revealed favorable feedback for MR modules in neurosurgical education, training, and surgical operative outcomes, warranting further investigation to compare MR-based complementary curriculums, standard training methods, and the underlying advantages and disadvantages of MR modules for neurosurgical pedagogy. Based on this literature review, the authors developed an early MR prototype using a 3D model of scoliosis, a surgical tool tracking system, and conductive material for freehand pedicle screw placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The technological features, cost-effectiveness, and limitations of MR are currently being adapted to complement education, surgical optimization, and forecasting applications in neurosurgery. An MR surgical spine prototype was developed as a complementary educational tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Neighborhood-level measures of socioeconomic status impact healthcare utilization and surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients in the Deep South.","authors":"Yifei Sun, Evan G Gross, Mohammad A Hamo, Sasha G Howell, James Mooney, Nicholas M B Laskay, Jakub Godzik","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24604","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of neighborhood-level and individual-level measures of socioeconomic status with readmission, complication rates, and postoperative length of stay of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) in the Deep South.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors identified all patients undergoing surgical intervention for the treatment of CSM from November 2010 to February 2022 using Current Procedural Terminology and ICD-9/ICD-10 codes. Patient demographic, socioeconomic, perioperative, and postoperative data for each patient were collected via review of the electronic medical record. Patient addresses underwent geospatial analysis and were used to extract the Area of Deprivation Index (ADI). Patients with ADIs greater than 75 were considered highly deprived. Univariate comparison and multivariate logistic regressions were used to analyze the relationship between socioeconomic variables and outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 490 patients with CSM met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The median age at the time of surgery was 60 (IQR 54-68) years. The median ADI was 75 (IQR 57-90). On multivariate regression analysis, unemployment was found to predict readmission within 1 year of index surgery (OR 4.08, 95% CI 1.87-9.61; p < 0.001). Having high ADI (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.94; p = 0.033) and being African American (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.97; p = 0.043) were found to be independently protective of readmission. Unemployment was found to be an independent predictor of postoperative complications (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.52-9.82; p = 0.006). On multivariate regression analysis, high ADI (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.02-2.81; p = 0.042) and living in a skilled nursing facility/residential facility (OR 8.84, 95% CI 3.08-28.5, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of prolonged length of hospital stay postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first single-institution study investigating the influence of neighborhood-level and employment status on readmission, complications, and lengths of stay in patients with CSM in the Deep South. Neighborhood-level measures of socioeconomic status play complex and unique roles in CSM patient outcomes in the Deep South, highlighting the Deep South as a potentially unique geographic region in terms of neurosurgical outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate methods of alleviating these disparities and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor. Methodological considerations for long-term lumbar surgery outcomes in patients with depression and anxiety.","authors":"Jixin Chen, Qinxin Zhou","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.SPINE241143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.SPINE241143","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142895461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Maintaining stability at the lumbosacral-pelvic region in adult spinal deformity surgery without sacroiliac joint fusion: are 4 pelvic screws superior to 2 pelvic screws?","authors":"Sarthak Mohanty, Stephen R Stephan, Christopher Mikhail, Andrew Platt, Joshua Bakhsheshian, Fthimnir M Hassan, Erik Lewerenz, Joseph M Lombardi, Zeeshan M Sardar, Ronald A Lehman, Lawrence G Lenke","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE231331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE231331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare a multiple pelvic screw fixation strategy (dual bilateral 4 pelvic screw fixation [4PvS]) with the use of single bilateral 2 pelvic screw fixation (2PvS), with the aim of addressing lumbosacral junction stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis is a single-center, retrospective review of ASD patients treated between 2015 and 2021. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up and spinal fusion to the sacrum without sacroiliac fusion and met at least one radiographic and procedural criterion: pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis ≥ 20°, T1 pelvic angle ≥ 20°, sagittal vertical axis ≥ 7.5 cm, scoliosis ≥ 50°, three-column osteotomy, or spinal fusion of ≥ 8 levels. Two sacropelvic fixation methods were compared: 4PvS versus 2PvS. Primary outcomes included spinal implant-related reoperation and screw breakage, while secondary outcomes included reoperation for symptomatic pelvic screws, screw loosening or bending, L5-S1 pseudarthrosis, and patient-reported outcomes. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to minimize selection bias and estimate causal treatment effects. Clinical outcomes were assessed using conditional multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study of 406 patients (67.98% female, mean age 64.48 years), 349 patients (85.96%) received 2PvS and 57 (14.04%) received 4PvS. Age (OR 1.081, 95% CI 1.027-1.145) and total number of osteotomies (OR 1.180, 95% CI 1.048-1.355) emerged as independent predictors of receiving the 4PvS technique. In unmatched cohorts (n = 406), 2-year implant-related reoperation rates (p = 0.1896) and pelvic screw breakage rates (p = 0.2498) were not significantly different between groups. However, in the 4:1 propensity score-matched cohort, the 2-year reoperation rate (10.53% for 2PvS vs 3.51% for 4PvS; OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.10-9.74 [p = 0.0312]) and the pelvic screw breakage rate (9.21% for 2PvS vs 3.51% for 4PvS; OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.08-7.63 [p = 0.0349]) were significantly higher among the 2PvS groups. The IPTW analysis confirmed these findings, with reoperation rates of 10.45% for 2PvS and 1.18% for 4PvS (p = 0.0244) and pelvic screw breakage rates of 8.72% and 1.18%, respectively (p = 0.0477). A safety assessment revealed comparable operative times and intra- and perioperative complications between the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who underwent 4PvS demonstrated significantly lower 2-year implant-related reoperation and pelvic screw breakage rates compared with 2PvS, with no differences in intraoperative or perioperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142895467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A propensity score-matched comparison between single-stage and multistage anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study.","authors":"Anisse N Chaker, Michael Melhem, Dheeraj Kagithala, Edvin Telemi, Tarek R Mansour, Leticia Simo, Kylie Springer, Lonni Schultz, Kari Jarabek, Anneliese F Rademacher, Matthew Brennan, Enoch Kim, David R Nerenz, Jad G Khalil, Richard Easton, Miguelangelo Perez-Cruet, Ilyas Aleem, Paul Park, Teck Soo, Doris Tong, Muwaffak Abdulhak, Jason M Schwalb, Victor Chang","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24423","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients undergoing anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgery can undergo either a single-stage or multistage operation, depending on surgeon preference. The goal of this study was to assess different patient outcomes between single-stage and multistage lumbar fusion procedures in a multicenter setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative database was queried for anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgeries between July 2018 and January 2022. Patients who underwent either single-stage or multistage procedures were included. For multistage procedures, the first surgery included both anterior lumbar interbody fusions and lateral lumbar interbody fusions. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications and improvement in patient-reported outcomes: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, EQ-5D, and satisfaction. The two cohorts were propensity score matched, while Poisson generalized estimating equation models were used for multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After one-to-one propensity score matching, 355 patients were identified in the single-stage and multistage cohorts. Single-stage procedures were associated with a lower risk of complications (p = 0.024), fewer emergency department visits (p = 0.029), and higher patient satisfaction after 1 year (p = 0.026) and 2 years (p = 0.007), compared with multistage procedures. After adjusting for baseline patient and operative characteristics, patients undergoing multistage procedures had a higher risk of complications (relative risk [RR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.34; p = 0.026), were less likely to be satisfied after 1 year (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.93; p < 0.001), and were less likely to experience improvement in back pain after 90 days (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99; p = 0.039) and 2 years (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96; p = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors observed that patients who undergo lumbar fusion surgery using a multistage approach have higher postoperative complication rates and are less likely to report satisfaction compared with a matched, single-stage procedure cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessing the prognostic impact of body composition phenotypes on surgical outcomes and survival in patients with spinal metastasis: a deep learning approach to preoperative CT analysis.","authors":"Syed I Khalid, Elie Massaad, John H Shin","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24722","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24722","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The prognostic significance of body composition phenotypes for survival in patients undergoing surgical intervention for spinal metastases has not yet been elucidated. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of body composition phenotypes on surgical outcomes and 5-year survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of patients treated surgically for spinal metastases between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. A deep learning pipeline assessed preoperative CT scans obtained within 3 months of surgery and identified muscle and fat content and composition. These data were used to categorize patients into 4 body composition phenotypic groups: 1) not sarcopenic, not obese; 2) sarcopenia alone; 3) obesity alone; and 4) sarcopenic obesity (SO). The groups were matched using a comprehensive propensity-matching procedure. Rates of postoperative outcomes and survival were evaluated. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the influence of body composition phenotypes on 5-year survival. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to evaluate survival probability further.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following a propensity-matching procedure, 102 matched patient records were identified (not sarcopenic, not obese, n = 24; sarcopenia alone, n = 27; obesity alone, n = 37; and SO, n = 14). SO was found to be associated with a significantly increased mortality risk within 60 months (HR 3.27, 95% CI 1.43-7.48). Kaplan-Meier plots demonstrate evident divergence in survival probability within 5 years among patients in the SO group compared to the others (log-rank test, p = 0.022). Additionally, time to death was also lower in patients with SO (p = 0.018). Significant differences in postoperative ambulation rates were noted among patients with SO (p = 0.048), whereas no preoperative difference existed (p = 0.12). No significant differences in postoperative disposition, length of hospital stay, wound-related complications, or inpatient medical complications were otherwise noted (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies SO as a distinct prognostic factor for increased mortality risk in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases, highlighting the complex interplay between body composition and patient outcomes. These findings advocate for integrating body composition analysis into preoperative assessment and tailored postoperative care strategies, promoting personalized treatment plans to improve survival and quality of life for this vulnerable patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}