Rémi Pelletier-Roy, Richard Cowley, Taryn Ludwig, Matthew Coyle, W Brent Edwards, Michael Asmussen, Fred Nicholls
{"title":"ames -国际脊柱研究小组放射学调整器在无症状人群中的应用:“正常”阈值是否合适?","authors":"Rémi Pelletier-Roy, Richard Cowley, Taryn Ludwig, Matthew Coyle, W Brent Edwards, Michael Asmussen, Fred Nicholls","doi":"10.3171/2025.2.SPINE241153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Ames-International Spine Study Group (ISSG) classification is a tool for stratifying severity in adult cervical spine deformity. The Ames-ISSG sagittal modifiers include C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope-cervical lordosis mismatch (TS-CL), and chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA). Each modifier stratifies patients as grade 0, 1, or 2. The study aimed to classify an asymptomatic population according to the Ames-ISSG sagittal modifier grades and assess differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between grades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Five hundred healthy, asymptomatic volunteers between 20 and 40 years of age without prior surgery or diagnosed spinal pathology were enrolled and underwent EOS imaging to measure their Ames-ISSG sagittal modifiers (cSVA, TS-CL, and CBVA). HRQOL questionnaires (the Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index) were also completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred seventy-seven patients were included. The cSVA was not analyzed because 475 of 477 individuals were grade 0 (< 4 cm). The TS-CL modifier was not analyzed because 472 of 477 individuals were grade 0 (< 15°). The CBVA was grade 0 (1°-10°) in 64% of individuals and grade 1 (-10° to 0° or 11°-25°) in 36%. There was no significant difference between grades in HRQOL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Ames-ISSG classification sagittal modifiers cSVA and TS-CL grade 0 describe normal anatomy. A CBVA grade of 1 is present in 36% of asymptomatic individuals with no difference in HRQOL scores. This study validates the threshold for grade 0 in a normative population for TS-CL and cSVA. It also highlights inconsistency in CBVA and the importance of specific instructions for appropriate evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the Ames-International Spine Study Group radiographic modifiers to an asymptomatic population: are the thresholds for \\\"normal\\\" appropriate?\",\"authors\":\"Rémi Pelletier-Roy, Richard Cowley, Taryn Ludwig, Matthew Coyle, W Brent Edwards, Michael Asmussen, Fred Nicholls\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.2.SPINE241153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Ames-International Spine Study Group (ISSG) classification is a tool for stratifying severity in adult cervical spine deformity. The Ames-ISSG sagittal modifiers include C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope-cervical lordosis mismatch (TS-CL), and chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA). Each modifier stratifies patients as grade 0, 1, or 2. The study aimed to classify an asymptomatic population according to the Ames-ISSG sagittal modifier grades and assess differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between grades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Five hundred healthy, asymptomatic volunteers between 20 and 40 years of age without prior surgery or diagnosed spinal pathology were enrolled and underwent EOS imaging to measure their Ames-ISSG sagittal modifiers (cSVA, TS-CL, and CBVA). HRQOL questionnaires (the Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index) were also completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred seventy-seven patients were included. The cSVA was not analyzed because 475 of 477 individuals were grade 0 (< 4 cm). The TS-CL modifier was not analyzed because 472 of 477 individuals were grade 0 (< 15°). The CBVA was grade 0 (1°-10°) in 64% of individuals and grade 1 (-10° to 0° or 11°-25°) in 36%. There was no significant difference between grades in HRQOL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Ames-ISSG classification sagittal modifiers cSVA and TS-CL grade 0 describe normal anatomy. A CBVA grade of 1 is present in 36% of asymptomatic individuals with no difference in HRQOL scores. This study validates the threshold for grade 0 in a normative population for TS-CL and cSVA. It also highlights inconsistency in CBVA and the importance of specific instructions for appropriate evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.SPINE241153\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.SPINE241153","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:Ames-International Spine Study Group (ISSG)分类是对成人颈椎畸形严重程度进行分层的工具。Ames-ISSG矢状面修饰包括C2-7矢状面垂直轴(cSVA)、T1斜颈前凸不匹配(TS-CL)和下巴-眉毛垂直角(CBVA)。每个修饰词将患者分为0级、1级或2级。该研究旨在根据Ames-ISSG矢状面修饰等级对无症状人群进行分类,并评估不同等级之间健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的差异。方法:对前瞻性收集的数据库进行横断面分析。500名健康、无症状、年龄在20 - 40岁之间、未做过手术或未诊断出脊柱病理的志愿者被纳入研究,并接受了EOS成像来测量他们的Ames-ISSG矢状面调节剂(cSVA、TS-CL和CBVA)。同时完成HRQOL问卷(Oswestry残疾指数和颈部残疾指数)。结果:纳入477例患者。没有分析cSVA,因为477个人中有475人是0级(< 4 cm)。由于477个个体中有472个为0级(< 15°),所以没有分析TS-CL修饰符。64%的个体CBVA为0级(1°-10°),36%的个体CBVA为1级(-10°- 0°或11°-25°)。两组间HRQOL无显著性差异。结论:Ames-ISSG分级矢状位调节剂cSVA和TS-CL 0级描述了正常解剖。36%的无症状患者CBVA评分为1级,HRQOL评分无差异。本研究在TS-CL和cSVA的标准人群中验证了0级的阈值。它还强调了CBVA的不一致性以及对适当评估的具体指示的重要性。
Application of the Ames-International Spine Study Group radiographic modifiers to an asymptomatic population: are the thresholds for "normal" appropriate?
Objective: The Ames-International Spine Study Group (ISSG) classification is a tool for stratifying severity in adult cervical spine deformity. The Ames-ISSG sagittal modifiers include C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope-cervical lordosis mismatch (TS-CL), and chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA). Each modifier stratifies patients as grade 0, 1, or 2. The study aimed to classify an asymptomatic population according to the Ames-ISSG sagittal modifier grades and assess differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between grades.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Five hundred healthy, asymptomatic volunteers between 20 and 40 years of age without prior surgery or diagnosed spinal pathology were enrolled and underwent EOS imaging to measure their Ames-ISSG sagittal modifiers (cSVA, TS-CL, and CBVA). HRQOL questionnaires (the Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index) were also completed.
Results: Four hundred seventy-seven patients were included. The cSVA was not analyzed because 475 of 477 individuals were grade 0 (< 4 cm). The TS-CL modifier was not analyzed because 472 of 477 individuals were grade 0 (< 15°). The CBVA was grade 0 (1°-10°) in 64% of individuals and grade 1 (-10° to 0° or 11°-25°) in 36%. There was no significant difference between grades in HRQOL.
Conclusions: The Ames-ISSG classification sagittal modifiers cSVA and TS-CL grade 0 describe normal anatomy. A CBVA grade of 1 is present in 36% of asymptomatic individuals with no difference in HRQOL scores. This study validates the threshold for grade 0 in a normative population for TS-CL and cSVA. It also highlights inconsistency in CBVA and the importance of specific instructions for appropriate evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.