CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE最新文献

{"title":"THE DISCOURSE OF “LOCAL” IN MODERN CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE: CONCEPTS AND RESEARCH STRATEGIES","authors":"S. Vytkalov","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/121-137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/121-137","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Introduction. To understand the logic of forming a specific cultural map, without which it is impossible to talk about the complete history of national culture, it requires its synthetic reconstruction as a unique integrity based on the analysis of the variety of spatial loci of human being. Therefore, spatial discourse in the context of contemporary cultural studies is defined by the search for a “new locality” as ways of constructing a cultural map of processes and phenomena, which are actively changing and transforming. The works of leading western researchers, whose subject of attention are such concepts as “cultural area”, “region”, “local cultural practices”, “production of cultural area”, etc. are analyzed. The corresponding research methods of these authors were identified and an attempt was made to impose these techniques on Western Ukrainian cultural reality. The importance of local history study is emphasized both in the life of each state and in cultural studies. The local histories influence the formation of national discourse. This work is a kind of methodological basis for many scientific works of the author aimed at the study of the regional cultural and artistic area.","PeriodicalId":163344,"journal":{"name":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125751546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"DISCURSIVE PRACTICES OF MEDIA CULTURE: CULTURAL ASPECT","authors":"A. Skoryk","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/85-104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/85-104","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION In the broadest sense, the intrinsic function of culture is to preserve the different values and achievements of Humanity. Therefore primarily, by its ontological essence, culture is a medium for enunciation of a meaningful existence and it is a very essence of a meaningful existence. Therefore, a language must arise by means of which the sphere of values itself becomes recognizable and meaningful. The language of intrinsic ideas of a given culture, which organizes and directs its sense-making function, becomes such a language (and it is characteristic for every possible historical type of culture). Namely in the aspect of “meaningful enunciation” in the culture of the new millennium an assumption was made that the discourses and discursive practices used in the field of contemporary humanitaristics, in particular in cultural sciences, create a homogeneous field and have a clear set of established characteristics which would be interesting to analyze. First of all, we proceeded from the fact that a discourse means a verbally articulated form of objectification of the content of human consciousness in this particular era, governed by a type of thinking, dominant in a certain sociocultural tradition. This concept gains a particular importance in the problematic field of cultural studies 1 . Just here discourse appears in the focus of attention, undergoing some kind of renaissance of meaningfulness: the discourse is considered to be a significant element of socio-cultural interaction. Thus, first of all, discourse is a language, immersed into a life and social context. But it is not an isolated textual or interlocutory structure. In the process of development of discursive analysis as a specific field of humanitarian researches it becomes clear that the meaning of discourse is not limited by written or oral language, but it also determines extralinguistic semiotic processes. Thus, for adequate analysis of thinking activity, it is extremely important to fix the boundaries of the discursive sphere. The space of discursive","PeriodicalId":163344,"journal":{"name":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121115929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"HISTORY OF CLUB DEVELOPMENT IN UKRAINE","authors":"L. Polishchuk","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/49-68","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/49-68","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":163344,"journal":{"name":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123411893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND PRACTICES OF HUMAN SUBJECTIVATION","authors":"P. Herchanivska","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/1-16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/1-16","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION In the acentric culture of the postmodern, the crisis of identification is increasingly manifesting itself, which consists in the destruction of the conditions of a holistic perception by a subject of himself as an autonomous personality. This process has especially deepened in the context of globalization, when іn a single social-cultural field the multi-directional axiological systems have appeared, that greatly complicated the task of human self-identification. I’ll draw attention to another aspect: repressions remain an integral element of social-cultural relations in society. Therefore, despite the fact that modern societies have received formal freedoms in the form of human rights, freedom of speech, the possibility of taking part in the political life of society, the threat to the subjectivation of the individual does not disappear. This actualized the study of the problem of human subjectivation in the context of contemporary social-cultural realities. A number of theoretical and methodological aspects of the problem of human subjectivation in modern society have been developed by such scientists as H. Arendt, T. Adorno, M. Horkheimer, J. Baudrillard, Z. Bauman, J. Galbraith, H. Marcuse, F. Nietzsche, M. Foucault, E. Fromm, M. Hardt, A. Negri and etc. The main paradigms for this phenomenon were formulated, in particular: social-cultural reality creates conditions for the subjectivation; there is a two-way link between the subject and social-cultural reality. Based on these paradigms, we shall determine the specifics of the process of human subjectivation in the conditions of modern Ukrainian society. Let us first of all comprehend the essence of M. Foucault defined this concept as follows: “I call “subjectivation” the process through which the formation of the subject takes place, more precisely, subjectivity, which, obviously, serves only one of the given possibilities of organizing a certain self-consciousness” 1 . M. Foucault not only rejects the traditional understanding of subjectivity as an apriori and universal form of human existence, but also develops its new understanding. He states that the","PeriodicalId":163344,"journal":{"name":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124096258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"POST-NEO-ROMANTICISM AS A PHENOMENON OF THE CONTEMPORARY CULTURE","authors":"O. Kolesnyk","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/17-33","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/17-33","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":163344,"journal":{"name":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131448002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"MEMORY STUDY AND COMMEMORATION EFFECT OF MODERN UKRAINIAN FICTIONAL TEXTS","authors":"I. Rybalka","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/69-84","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/69-84","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION In the past fifty of so years, the society has demonstrated an increasing interest in studying memory that has opened a certain epoch in this field of knowledge. Some researchers even dare to refer to this phenomenon as a “memory boom”. The boom started in late 1970s in sociology and has only begun to wind down at the turn on millennium 1 . But the decrease of the interest to the topic among the sociologist has transformed into the “boom” of “memory study” in other humanitarian fields such as philosophy, psychology, culture studies, politics, public relation and even theory and history of literature. The raise of interest to understanding the mechanisms of collective memory could be understood easily when taking into consideration “the decline of postwar modernist narratives of progressive improvement through an ever-expanding welfare state, nation-states turned to the past as a basis for shoring up their legitimacy. The decline of utopian visions supposedly redirected our gaze to collective pasts, which served as a repository of inspiration for repressed identities and unfulfilled claims. Without unifying collective aspirations, identity politics proliferated” 2 . “Memory studies” are one of the most pressing fields of interdisciplinary research today, the main purpose of which is supposed to study the collective and cultural memory of any society. One of the most urging reason for studying it is to single out the unifying elements for the society as a group of individuals. Collective memory, that is manifested and fulfilled in traditions, beliefs and myths cultivated in society, occupied the minds of mainly historians, sociologists and psychologists until recently. The results of this kind of researching is broadly used in public relation, politics, sociology and so on. At the present day, when the relationship between different fields of knowledge becomes vaguer, this phenomenon has also interested the literary scholars. They tend to use fictional texts as a source to collect the information","PeriodicalId":163344,"journal":{"name":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125943394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"THE UKRAINIAN KOBZA AND BANDURA IN ORGANOLOGISTS’ WORKS OF THE SECOND HALF XX – EARLY XXI CENTURIES","authors":"I. Zinkiv","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/138-158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/138-158","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Bandurais considered in organology to be the most debatable instrument of the traditional music culture of the Ukrainians. The issues of its origins are being actively discussed in modern scientific discourse. The representatives of traditional Slavic organology, Mykola Lysenko, Aleksandr Famintsyn, and Hnat Khotkevych, made significant contributions to its study, and found that kobza and bandura were two different instruments. These scientists have shown that there were two types of bandura in the Ukrainian traditional instruments: with prystrunki (short melodic strings) and without. H. Khotkevych refuted the Famintsyn’s hypothesis about the Western European origin of the bandura and the eastern, Asian origin of kobza. He made an assumption about autochthonous origin of the bandura, without confirming it with scientific arguments, which, ultimetaly, corresponded to the general state of organology development in 1920s in the territory of the USSR. The author attempts in her article to analyze kobza and bandura functioning in the works of Ukrainian and Russian organologists of the second half of 20th and the beginning of 21 centuries – A. Humeniuk, К. Vertkov, M. Khai, M. Prokopenko, L. Cherkaskyi, V. Kushpet, as well as individual bandura players. Kobza or bandura in Andrii Humeniuk’s concept. The famous Ukrainian organologist A. Humeniuk examines kobza (or bandura) in his monograph “Ukrainian Folk Musical Instruments” (1967), assigning them to the strings on which the sound was produced by a pinch 1 . The author, in the historical reference on these instruments origin, development and existence, treats kobza and bandura as a single instrument (in the traditions of Ukrainian traditional organology). The organologist, when giving an assessment of the two controversial theories of these instruments origin – the migratory theory by A. Famintsyn and the autochthonous theory by H. Khotkevych – indicates the bias and one-sidedness of each of them, since “the first <...> did not take into account the folk’s creative initiative","PeriodicalId":163344,"journal":{"name":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116279546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"TURN TO POSTMODERNISM IN JOSE ORTEGA Y GASSET’S WORKS AND THE PRESENCE OF POSTMODERNITY FEATURES IN MODERNITY","authors":"Olha Smolina","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/105-120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/105-120","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The concepts of “modernism” and “postmodernism” (or “modern” and “postmodern” in usage on post-soviet scientific space and “modernity” and “postmodernity” in English-language literature) 1 today are widely used in a scientific context. At the same time, the scatter of their meanings, understandings, and definitions is very large. There is no consensus among scientists on the chronological framework of periods indicated by these concepts. This fact actualizes the continuation of research to identify the specifics of the concepts of modernity and postmodernity, as well as the phenomena that they designate. In the context of this problem, the judgments and conclusions of the Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset are interesting. The study of his work is relevant due to the unresolved circle of cultural and philosophical problems and questions that he posed at the beginning of the twentieth century for the world culture (and above all – European culture) of our time. The work of Jose Ortega y Gasset as a whole is characterized by trends inherent in the culture of the first half of the twentieth century, which are usually collectively defined as the period of modern, modernism, and avantgarde. At the same time, in a significant part of Ortega’s work, we can notice the trends of the next period, which became significant in the second half of the twentieth – the beginning of the twenty-first century, the tendencies of postmodernity and postmodernism. What is the reason for this phenomenon? Is this the result of creative insights of a gifted person or the implicit presence of postmodernity features in modernity, or maybe this is a consequence of the blurriness and uncertainty of the distinguished stages boundaries in worldview and culture, which are conventionally defined as “modernity” and “postmodernity”? Naturally, it is hardly possible to unambiguously and fully study the problem and answer these questions in the framework of one article. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to expand the understanding of Jose Ortega y Gasset’s cultural studies, to identify the features of","PeriodicalId":163344,"journal":{"name":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","volume":"71 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123181164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}