DISCURSIVE PRACTICES OF MEDIA CULTURE: CULTURAL ASPECT

A. Skoryk
{"title":"DISCURSIVE PRACTICES OF MEDIA CULTURE: CULTURAL ASPECT","authors":"A. Skoryk","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/85-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION In the broadest sense, the intrinsic function of culture is to preserve the different values and achievements of Humanity. Therefore primarily, by its ontological essence, culture is a medium for enunciation of a meaningful existence and it is a very essence of a meaningful existence. Therefore, a language must arise by means of which the sphere of values itself becomes recognizable and meaningful. The language of intrinsic ideas of a given culture, which organizes and directs its sense-making function, becomes such a language (and it is characteristic for every possible historical type of culture). Namely in the aspect of “meaningful enunciation” in the culture of the new millennium an assumption was made that the discourses and discursive practices used in the field of contemporary humanitaristics, in particular in cultural sciences, create a homogeneous field and have a clear set of established characteristics which would be interesting to analyze. First of all, we proceeded from the fact that a discourse means a verbally articulated form of objectification of the content of human consciousness in this particular era, governed by a type of thinking, dominant in a certain sociocultural tradition. This concept gains a particular importance in the problematic field of cultural studies 1 . Just here discourse appears in the focus of attention, undergoing some kind of renaissance of meaningfulness: the discourse is considered to be a significant element of socio-cultural interaction. Thus, first of all, discourse is a language, immersed into a life and social context. But it is not an isolated textual or interlocutory structure. In the process of development of discursive analysis as a specific field of humanitarian researches it becomes clear that the meaning of discourse is not limited by written or oral language, but it also determines extralinguistic semiotic processes. Thus, for adequate analysis of thinking activity, it is extremely important to fix the boundaries of the discursive sphere. The space of discursive","PeriodicalId":163344,"journal":{"name":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/85-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION In the broadest sense, the intrinsic function of culture is to preserve the different values and achievements of Humanity. Therefore primarily, by its ontological essence, culture is a medium for enunciation of a meaningful existence and it is a very essence of a meaningful existence. Therefore, a language must arise by means of which the sphere of values itself becomes recognizable and meaningful. The language of intrinsic ideas of a given culture, which organizes and directs its sense-making function, becomes such a language (and it is characteristic for every possible historical type of culture). Namely in the aspect of “meaningful enunciation” in the culture of the new millennium an assumption was made that the discourses and discursive practices used in the field of contemporary humanitaristics, in particular in cultural sciences, create a homogeneous field and have a clear set of established characteristics which would be interesting to analyze. First of all, we proceeded from the fact that a discourse means a verbally articulated form of objectification of the content of human consciousness in this particular era, governed by a type of thinking, dominant in a certain sociocultural tradition. This concept gains a particular importance in the problematic field of cultural studies 1 . Just here discourse appears in the focus of attention, undergoing some kind of renaissance of meaningfulness: the discourse is considered to be a significant element of socio-cultural interaction. Thus, first of all, discourse is a language, immersed into a life and social context. But it is not an isolated textual or interlocutory structure. In the process of development of discursive analysis as a specific field of humanitarian researches it becomes clear that the meaning of discourse is not limited by written or oral language, but it also determines extralinguistic semiotic processes. Thus, for adequate analysis of thinking activity, it is extremely important to fix the boundaries of the discursive sphere. The space of discursive
媒介文化的话语实践:文化层面
从最广泛的意义上说,文化的内在功能是保存人类不同的价值观和成就。因此,首先,就其本体论本质而言,文化是表达有意义存在的媒介,它是有意义存在的本质。因此,必须产生一种语言,通过这种语言,价值领域本身变得可识别和有意义。特定文化的内在思想的语言,组织和指导其意义建构功能,成为这样一种语言(它是每一种可能的历史文化类型的特征)。也就是说,在新千年文化中的“有意义的阐述”方面,有一个假设是,当代人文主义领域,特别是文化科学领域中使用的话语和话语实践创造了一个同质的领域,并具有一套清晰的既定特征,这些特征将是有趣的分析。首先,我们从这样一个事实出发,即在这个特定的时代,话语意味着人类意识内容的一种口头表达形式的对象化,受某种思维类型的支配,在某种社会文化传统中占主导地位。这一概念在文化研究这个充满问题的领域中显得尤为重要。正是在这里,话语成为人们关注的焦点,经历了某种意义的复兴:话语被认为是社会文化互动的一个重要因素。因此,话语首先是一种沉浸在生活和社会语境中的语言。但它不是一个孤立的文本结构或审间结构。在话语分析作为人道主义研究的一个特定领域的发展过程中,话语的意义不受书面或口头语言的限制,它还决定着语言外的符号学过程。因此,为了对思维活动进行充分的分析,确定话语领域的边界是极其重要的。话语的空间
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信