TURN TO POSTMODERNISM IN JOSE ORTEGA Y GASSET’S WORKS AND THE PRESENCE OF POSTMODERNITY FEATURES IN MODERNITY

Olha Smolina
{"title":"TURN TO POSTMODERNISM IN JOSE ORTEGA Y GASSET’S WORKS AND THE PRESENCE OF POSTMODERNITY FEATURES IN MODERNITY","authors":"Olha Smolina","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/105-120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The concepts of “modernism” and “postmodernism” (or “modern” and “postmodern” in usage on post-soviet scientific space and “modernity” and “postmodernity” in English-language literature) 1 today are widely used in a scientific context. At the same time, the scatter of their meanings, understandings, and definitions is very large. There is no consensus among scientists on the chronological framework of periods indicated by these concepts. This fact actualizes the continuation of research to identify the specifics of the concepts of modernity and postmodernity, as well as the phenomena that they designate. In the context of this problem, the judgments and conclusions of the Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset are interesting. The study of his work is relevant due to the unresolved circle of cultural and philosophical problems and questions that he posed at the beginning of the twentieth century for the world culture (and above all – European culture) of our time. The work of Jose Ortega y Gasset as a whole is characterized by trends inherent in the culture of the first half of the twentieth century, which are usually collectively defined as the period of modern, modernism, and avantgarde. At the same time, in a significant part of Ortega’s work, we can notice the trends of the next period, which became significant in the second half of the twentieth – the beginning of the twenty-first century, the tendencies of postmodernity and postmodernism. What is the reason for this phenomenon? Is this the result of creative insights of a gifted person or the implicit presence of postmodernity features in modernity, or maybe this is a consequence of the blurriness and uncertainty of the distinguished stages boundaries in worldview and culture, which are conventionally defined as “modernity” and “postmodernity”? Naturally, it is hardly possible to unambiguously and fully study the problem and answer these questions in the framework of one article. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to expand the understanding of Jose Ortega y Gasset’s cultural studies, to identify the features of","PeriodicalId":163344,"journal":{"name":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","volume":"71 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CULTURE AND ART PANORAMA OF UKRAINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-186-5/105-120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The concepts of “modernism” and “postmodernism” (or “modern” and “postmodern” in usage on post-soviet scientific space and “modernity” and “postmodernity” in English-language literature) 1 today are widely used in a scientific context. At the same time, the scatter of their meanings, understandings, and definitions is very large. There is no consensus among scientists on the chronological framework of periods indicated by these concepts. This fact actualizes the continuation of research to identify the specifics of the concepts of modernity and postmodernity, as well as the phenomena that they designate. In the context of this problem, the judgments and conclusions of the Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset are interesting. The study of his work is relevant due to the unresolved circle of cultural and philosophical problems and questions that he posed at the beginning of the twentieth century for the world culture (and above all – European culture) of our time. The work of Jose Ortega y Gasset as a whole is characterized by trends inherent in the culture of the first half of the twentieth century, which are usually collectively defined as the period of modern, modernism, and avantgarde. At the same time, in a significant part of Ortega’s work, we can notice the trends of the next period, which became significant in the second half of the twentieth – the beginning of the twenty-first century, the tendencies of postmodernity and postmodernism. What is the reason for this phenomenon? Is this the result of creative insights of a gifted person or the implicit presence of postmodernity features in modernity, or maybe this is a consequence of the blurriness and uncertainty of the distinguished stages boundaries in worldview and culture, which are conventionally defined as “modernity” and “postmodernity”? Naturally, it is hardly possible to unambiguously and fully study the problem and answer these questions in the framework of one article. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to expand the understanding of Jose Ortega y Gasset’s cultural studies, to identify the features of
转向加塞特作品中的后现代主义以及后现代特征在现代性中的存在
“现代主义”和“后现代主义”的概念(或“现代”和“后现代”用于后苏联科学空间,“现代性”和“后现代”用于英语文学)今天在科学语境中被广泛使用。同时,它们的含义、理解和定义也非常分散。科学家们对这些概念所表示的时期的时间框架没有达成共识。这一事实实现了研究的继续,以确定现代性和后现代概念的具体内容,以及它们所指定的现象。在这个问题的背景下,西班牙哲学家约瑟夫·奥尔特加·加塞特的判断和结论是有趣的。由于他在20世纪初为我们这个时代的世界文化(尤其是欧洲文化)提出的尚未解决的文化和哲学问题和问题,对他的工作的研究是相关的。何塞·奥尔特加·伊·加塞特的作品总体上具有20世纪上半叶文化固有趋势的特点,这通常被统称为现代主义、现代主义和前卫主义时期。同时,在奥尔特加作品的重要部分中,我们可以注意到下一个时期的趋势,这在20世纪下半叶,也就是21世纪初变得很重要,即后现代主义和后现代主义的趋势。这种现象的原因是什么?这是一个天才的创造性见解的结果,还是现代性中隐含的后现代特征的存在,或者这可能是世界观和文化的不同阶段边界的模糊和不确定性的结果,这通常被定义为“现代性”和“后现代性”?当然,在一篇文章的框架内,几乎不可能明确而全面地研究这个问题并回答这些问题。因此,本文的目的是扩大对加塞特文化研究的认识,找出其特点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信