{"title":"Licensing competent children to assist institutional review boards.","authors":"Samuel Asiedu Owusu, Claudia Passos-Ferreira","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-109910","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jme-2024-109910","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adults are not always capable of representing children's views and interests, and many ethical issues in paediatric research could be better approached if children's perspectives are taken into consideration. Children do not currently serve as institutional review board (IRB) members or provide support to IRBs who review and decide on paediatric research proposals. Based on research on moral development, however, many children are competent and could play expert roles in the IRB process with significant benefits to the latter. In this article, we argue that competent children should be permitted to assist members of IRBs in reviewing proposed paediatric research. We present three reasons in favour of involving children in IRB activities: (1) this allows children to be more adequately represented; (2) this yields a more sensitive approach to ethical complexities in paediatric research; and (3) this can improve the quality of paediatric research and enhance the well-being of research subjects. We offer a model of how competent children could play a role in the IRB process and we discuss the application of this model in the context of global paediatric research in Ghana. We address some worries about involving children in IRBs, focusing on different stakeholders involved in the research review process: the impact on children, IRB members and paediatric researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"683-690"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358823/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144649700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Scaffolding informed consent.","authors":"Dominic Wilkinson, Neil Levy","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110105","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jme-2024-110105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The principle of respecting patient autonomy underpins the concept and practice of informed consent. Yet current approaches to consent often ignore the ways in which the exercise of autonomy is deeply epistemically dependent.In this paper, we draw on philosophical descriptions of autonomy 'scaffolding' and apply them to informed consent in medicine. We examine how this relates to other models of the doctor-patient relationship and other theories (eg, the notion of relational autonomy). A focus on scaffolding autonomy reframes the justification for existing ways of supporting decisions. In other cases, it suggests a need to rethink how, when and where professionals obtain consent. It may highlight the benefit of technology for supporting decisions.Finally, we consider the implications for some high-stakes decisions where autonomy is thought to be critical, for example, termination of pregnancy. We argue that such decisions should not be free from all sources of influence-rather they should be protected from undesired influence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"702-709"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7618263/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142965207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When is suicide a public health issue?","authors":"Tessa Jane Holzman, Julian Savulescu","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-111201","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jme-2025-111201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On 24 June 2025, the Australian Productivity Commission (PC) released an interim report evaluating the National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement. While the PC's recommendations are certainly important components of a robust national strategy for mental health and suicide prevention, they remain incomplete. A more fundamental question is when suicide is even a public health issue. We need to identify what is bad about suicide and articulate why and when it should be prevented. In this article, we will consider three possible approaches to suicide prevention: (1) suicide prevention as the prevention of death, (2) suicide prevention as the prevention of wrongful death and (3) suicide prevention as the prevention of bad death. We will ultimately demonstrate that only the third approach is adequately equipped to achieve what should ostensibly be the goals of a national suicide prevention scheme.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"658-661"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145634830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Humanitarianism or toxic colonialism? The burdens of unusable drug donations during crises.","authors":"Arianne Shahvisi, Patricia Kingori","doi":"10.1136/jme-2026-112619","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jme-2026-112619","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"655-657"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149001956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Martí Vila-Pérez, David Lorenzo-Izquierdo, Montserrat Esquerda-Aresté
{"title":"Embryo models and the regulatory void: ethical imperatives before legal action.","authors":"Martí Vila-Pérez, David Lorenzo-Izquierdo, Montserrat Esquerda-Aresté","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-111132","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jme-2025-111132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in stem cell research have enabled the creation of embryo models that challenge existing definitions and regulatory boundaries in embryo research. The scientific community has struggled to establish a coherent nomenclature for these models, leading to confusion and sensationalism about their nature and applications. Moreover, recent publications by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics and the Ethics Committee of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology have argued that embryonic models derived from stem cells are ineligible to be included in the definition of an embryo. However, some countries had already enacted legislation addressing the classification of certain models derived from stem cells as embryos prior to the issuance of these guidelines. This discrepancy engenders considerable tension among the scientific viewpoints of the countries safeguarded by these laws, with suggestions emerging from authoritative agencies. This research seeks to recognise the regulatory and ethical void created by inconsistent definitions of embryo-like entities and to advocate for a framework fostering interdisciplinary agreement in response to recent advancements. Alternatively, we aim to promote a bioethics that not only supports legislative decisions but also guarantees their validation before their implementation. We argue that without a unified interdisciplinary framework, legal structures may become fragmented, jeopardising both research integrity and public trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"678-682"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145471399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Moral equivalence and the grounds of moral status in stem cell-derived embryo models: a response to de Graeff and De Proost.","authors":"Johnny Sakr","doi":"10.1136/jme-2026-111712","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jme-2026-111712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gyngell <i>et al</i> argue that no intrinsic differences exist between embryos derived from fertilisation and stem cell-derived embryo models (SCEMs) that would justify attributing a higher moral status to the former. Nienke de Graeff and Lien De Proost challenge this claim by emphasising the diversity of SCEMs and by broadening moral evaluation beyond direct moral status to include relational, symbolic and instrumental value. This response argues that their pluralistic framework does not, in fact, undermine moral equivalence in cases where SCEMs successfully instantiate embryo-like human developmental organisation. Once the distinction between properties that ground moral status and considerations that merely shape social or regulatory responses is made explicit, no principled basis remains for differential moral standing. Variation among SCEMs defeats equivalence only where embryo-like organisation is absent; where it is present, moral parity follows. Likewise, relational and instrumental values may justify different governance strategies, but they cannot ground differences in moral worth without collapsing into policy convenience. Rejecting binary thinking does not require denying equivalence where morally relevant features coincide. Either SCEMs fail to model embryos, in which case equivalence never arises, or they succeed and must be treated as morally equivalent in respect of status. What cannot be coherently sustained is embryo-likeness without moral parity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"718-720"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"<i>Retraction: Panem, corticoids and circenses: the ethical fallout of Enhanced Games</i>.","authors":"","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-111085ret","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jme-2025-111085ret","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148412089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yekaterina Angelova, Stephanie Cheung, Marie S Thearle, Gregg A Robbins-Welty, Omar Farooq Mirza
{"title":"Respecting the right to refuse: is decision-making capacity disproportionately challenged in patients declining medical care in order to treat?","authors":"Yekaterina Angelova, Stephanie Cheung, Marie S Thearle, Gregg A Robbins-Welty, Omar Farooq Mirza","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-111141","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jme-2025-111141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the proportion of capacity challenges for refusal of care, the risk factors that may trigger challenges to capacity and to consider the implications of challenging capacity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined all psychiatric consults placed for decision-making capacity assessment over a 2-year period in an urban community hospital. Data were collected on the reasons for consultation, patient demographics and whether treatment occurred. Statistical analysis, including χ<sup>2</sup> test for equal proportions, was done to determine whether the proportion of capacity challenges for refusal of care differed from 50%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>122 consults questioning capacity were identified during the 2-year period, of which 112 (91.8%) were placed in the setting of refusal of care. Males were over-represented (68.9%) in the consults placed for capacity assessment compared with the proportion of males in all hospital admissions (48.8%) (p<0.0001). The odds of being treated increased in the cohort of patients who lacked decision-making capacity compared with those who were deemed to have capacity (OR 4.2 (95% CI 1.4 to 10.4); p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that capacity is challenged overwhelmingly in patients declining medical care. When these patients are decentred from decision making, the odds of completing treatment were more than four times higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"662-666"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638307/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145337157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Response to: Correspondence on 'No, pregnancy is not a disease' by Colgrove and Rodger.","authors":"Ognjen Arandjelović","doi":"10.1136/jme-2026-111711","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jme-2026-111711","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colgrove and Rodger argue that the case advanced by Smajdor and Räsänen for classifying pregnancy as a disease can be defeated by an existence proof-that is, by identifying at least one plausible theory of disease that excludes pregnancy while avoiding objections raised by Smajdor and Räsänen. Their candidate is a dysfunction account, according to which a disease requires the failure of some internal mechanism to perform its biological function. Pregnancy, they claim, involves no such failure. Even if one accepts the legitimacy of this dialectical strategy, the proposed exclusion is not as simple as advertised. In particular, the exclusion is obtained by narrowing the target phenomenon and by treating the concept of 'proper function' as if it had a determinate, value-free extension-one that it in fact does not possess. Since the apparent dialectical effect of an imperfect rebuttal can be to strengthen rather than weaken the target of criticism, I find it worth responding to both pieces in a single, joined-up analysis, which I aim to present here.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"716-717"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Agentic AI, medical morality and the transformation of the patient-physician relationship.","authors":"Robert Ranisch, Sabine Salloch","doi":"10.1136/jme-2026-112004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2026-112004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging development in the digital transformation of healthcare. Unlike conventional generative AI, agentic AI systems can perform autonomous, goal-directed actions and coordinate complex tasks. They promise to support or even collaborate with clinicians and patients in increasingly independent ways. While agentic AI raises familiar moral concerns regarding safety, accountability and bias, this article focuses on a less explored dimension: its capacity to transform the moral fabric of healthcare itself. Drawing on the framework of techno-moral change and the three domains of decision, relation and perception, we investigate how agentic AI might reshape the patient-physician relationship and reconfigure core concepts of medical morality. We argue that these shifts, while not fully predictable, demand ethical attention before widespread deployment. Ultimately, the paper calls for integrating ethical foresight into the design and use of agentic AI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149017097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}