{"title":"Educational Needs among Women Admitted to High Secure Forensic Psychiatric Care","authors":"H. Selenius, Linda Fälth, I. Svensson, S. Strand","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.1973234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.1973234","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Forensic psychiatric patients’ low educational attainment is a strong predictor for recidivism. However, there is a lack of studies on the educational background among women admitted to forensic psychiatric care. The study aimed to investigate the educational background among women within a high secure forensic psychiatric setting. A mixed-method design was applied. Data were collected from registers, including medical records, forensic psychiatric investigations, and verdicts (n = 93), and by conducting interviews (n = 61) with women admitted to forensic psychiatric care in Sweden. The women’s education length varied between 5 and 18 years. According to interviews and registers, more than 70% of the women were found to have some school-related problems. In the interviews, some women associated school with conflicts, loneliness, and learning difficulties. Others explained how their disadvantageous home environment and many school changes affected their learning and problems developing and maintaining social relationships. Women with a neurodevelopmental disorder were to a higher degree documented with school-related problems than women without such disorders (97% vs. 63%). The educational attainment varied among the women, and consequently, their educational needs were heterogeneous. Therefore, they should be offered tailored education and vocational support to have an increased prerequisite for adjusting to and participating in society.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"28 15 1","pages":"269 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81521935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle L. Wells, Christopher Hartwright, S. Morgan, Leigh Gale
{"title":"“My Kids Will Always Be around Me, if Not Physically, Spiritually They Will Always Be around Me”: Fathers in Forensic Inpatient Care","authors":"Michelle L. Wells, Christopher Hartwright, S. Morgan, Leigh Gale","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.1945840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.1945840","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The current study aimed to increase understanding of men’s experiences of fatherhood in forensic inpatient care; a population overlooked in research and at risk of neglect in clinical practice. Eight participants recruited from forensic inpatient services were interviewed. Data was analyzed via social constructivist Grounded Theory. The central psychological concept developed was that of paternal connection, reflecting a transient sense of connection to the father-child relationship. Core categories included 1) Psychological Processes, 2) Interpersonal Relationships, and 3) Institutional Organization. Fathers in forensic inpatient care experience dynamic psychological connectivity to their paternal relationship, regardless of child contact. This multi-layered experience requires responsive intervention to support fathers in this context. Recommendations for research, practice, and policy are outlined.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"142 - 185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91110188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assessment of Credibility of Testimony in Alleged Intimate Partner Violence: A Case Report","authors":"Teresa C. Silva","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.1945836","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.1945836","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Structured assessment of witness credibility in intimate partner violence (IPV) allegations has been well established for child custody purposes, although it is far from being systematically implemented, particularly when child custody is not at stake. Unstructured approaches may follow general, long-accepted guidelines in legal proceedings but ignore empirical knowledge about perpetrators and victims produced by years of cumulative research. Furthermore, judgments are at a high risk of being compromised by characteristics of the informant, the listener, and the situation. An accurate analysis of witness credibility is harder to accomplish and more essential when there is no conclusive evidence or when the alleged perpetrator denies the accusations and has no known history of interpersonal violence. To not believe real victims or wrongfully convict innocent individuals are miscarriages of justice that might be prevented to a certain extent if we improve credibility assessment accuracy. In this case report, I used a structured method that demonstrates how a conclusion about the credibility of an alleged victim of IPV can contrast with the conclusion produced by a trial judge. A structured credibility assessment of the alleged victim could have produced a different judgment. Implications for individuals, their families, and the justice system are discussed.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"88 1","pages":"58 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76803157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica Cartwright, Danielle A. Lawrence, Christopher Hartwright
{"title":"Improving Psychological Interventions from the Perspective of Forensic Mental Health Service Users: A Meta-synthesis","authors":"Jessica Cartwright, Danielle A. Lawrence, Christopher Hartwright","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.1945838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.1945838","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Limited evidence exists for the effectiveness of psychological interventions that target the mental health needs of people who use forensic mental health services. Capturing service users’ perspectives and experiences may provide information helpful to understanding why this is the case. It may also provide information that could help to improve the effectiveness of such interventions with this population. This paper aimed to address this and reviewed qualitative studies to identify the factors that are considered important to the effectiveness of interventions from the perspectives of service users. A review of the literature was conducted and eleven papers were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. A meta-ethnography approach was used to synthesize the data. Six super-ordinate themes emerged which were synthesized into a hierarchy of treatment based on two main categories: “Treatment Foundations” and “Treatment Benefits.” The findings suggested that addressing the Treatment Foundation factors such as enabling informed decision-making; developing trusting therapeutic relationships; and providing accessible materials whilst considering service user preferences can in turn result in service users benefitting from treatment in a number of ways. The findings have significant implications for future research, mental health service providers, clinicians and therapists, and for those who design therapeutic interventions.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"113 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74101944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Johnson, Christine D. Baker, Barbara Prempeh, Shereen R. Lewis
{"title":"Forensic Psychology Consultation in Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma: A Response to Commentary","authors":"M. Johnson, Christine D. Baker, Barbara Prempeh, Shereen R. Lewis","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.1945839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.1945839","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Critical commentary and exchange are vital to advancing forensic psychology consultation in Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma. The interests of children and families warrant such attention. Multiple sources, such as psychological research identifying processes in wrongful conviction, peer-reviewed medical research, the National Registry of Exonerations, and documentary film illustrations, all contribute to recognizing and reducing risks of wrongful conviction.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"144 1","pages":"87 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77269960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
V. de Vogel, J. Stam, Y. Bouman, P. ter Horst, M. Lancel
{"title":"Gender Differences in Substance Abuse History and Offending Behavior: A Multicentre Study in Dutch Forensic Psychiatry","authors":"V. de Vogel, J. Stam, Y. Bouman, P. ter Horst, M. Lancel","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.1945833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.1945833","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Substance abuse is an important risk factor for offending, but is mostly studied in males. The aim of this multicentre study is to gain insight into possible gender differences in substance abuse history and offending behavior in forensic psychiatric patients. Files were analyzed of 275 women and 275 matched men who have been admitted between 1984 and 2014 to one of four Dutch gender-mixed forensic hospitals. Risk assessment ratings were related to registered violent incidents during treatment for both women and men and to official recidivism data after discharge for a subgroup of 78 women. Substance abuse history was coded as a risk factor for more than half of the women (56.7%), but significantly more often for men (68.4%). Men were more often diagnosed with substance dependence and more frequently committed the index-offense whilst intoxicated. Prediction of violent incidents during treatment was more accurate for men. A history of substance abuse was not a significant predictor for recidivism after discharge in the subgroup women. It is concluded that there are gender differences in substance abuse history and that the relationship with offending behavior seems stronger for men. These differences have implications for substance use treatment in forensic mental health services.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"44 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89812852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘It’s so Hard to Get Out of that Bubble’. A Phenomenological Analysis with Men Who Have Stalked","authors":"R. Wheatley, B. Winder, D. Kuss","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2020.1855385","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2020.1855385","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research exploring the experiences of men who have stalked is lacking, specifically how they construe their reality for stalking episodes. Addressing this absence of experiential expert contribution was the pivotal and timely aim of this research, given interventions for stalking are under-developed. Seven in-depth interviews were conducted with men convicted of stalking and held in UK prisons. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was used with a unique, visually adapted repertory grid technique, derived from Personal Construct psychology (PCP). Both methods allow the researcher to explore the sense-making of experts by experience, hence the combined methodology produced an in-depth assessment of the phenomenon of stalking. This was the first study to capture the constructed realities of men who stalk, and the first study to use repertory grids with stalkers, piloting a visually adapted repertory grid technique for maximizing engagement. High levels of convergence between participants were found, with the analysis leading to the generation of three superordinate themes: (i) Neediness, (ii) “Nothing could stop me”, and (iii) Labeling, which were broadly supported by the repertory grid analyses. The findings contribute to both knowledge and practice gaps by supporting the relational goal pursuit theory for stalking and providing an evidence base to support therapeutic interventions for people who stalk. The effectiveness of deterrence and a need to improve social awareness for stalking are discussed.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"13 1","pages":"249 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73533105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Lessons Learned from Conducting Research with Prisoners Sentenced to Death and Their Families in India: Ethical Considerations and Methodological Challenges","authors":"Pankhuri Bhatia, Pankhuri Aggarwal","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.1904808","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.1904808","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although ethical and methodological challenges of conducting research with vulnerable populations are widely acknowledged, there are fewer discussions on the unique difficulties encountered by researchers while working with prisoners sentenced to death and their families. This paper presents the reflective accounts of two researchers’ fieldwork experience, highlighting the ethical concerns and methodological challenges encountered while conducting an interdisciplinary research project on the mental health of prisoners sentenced to death and their families in India. Specifically, we discuss challenges faced during sampling of participants (prisoners and families), obtaining informed consent, confidentiality and right to anonymity, role confusion and conflict of interest, potential risks and benefits to research participants, and personal biases of researchers. We also provide suggestions for future researchers who wish to conduct research in this area and for policy makers to work toward minimizing the stigmatization and oppression faced by this community. Implications for research, clinical work, education, and training of mental health professionals are discussed.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"403 - 416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74306309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Monica Weiner, Shaina Groisberg, Paulett Diah, Marybeth Mariano, Jennifer Romalin
{"title":"A commentary on Johnson et al.’s “Shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma: Wrongful conviction risks, mis-information effects, and psychological consultation”","authors":"Monica Weiner, Shaina Groisberg, Paulett Diah, Marybeth Mariano, Jennifer Romalin","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.1892439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.1892439","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Abusive Head Trauma (AHT) is a medical diagnosis which indicates that accidents, diseases, or other medical conditions do not plausibly explain a child’s injuries. While psychologists may be involved in AHT cases, they do not generally evaluate children at the time injuries caused by AHT occur and they do not diagnose those injuries. This article is a commentary on Johnson et al, which advises that psychologists would benefit from understanding the medical aspects of an AHT case. This is a laudable goal. However, in an effort to discuss medical issues regarding AHT and legal exonerations, the article presents flawed data and speculative theories which are unsupported by medical evidence or the extensive range of generally accepted medical literature. We discuss some of these flaws and present a more in-depth medical analysis in the hope that interested psychologists gain more understanding of this very complex area of medical specialty.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"41 1","pages":"395 - 402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89710270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Angela M. Jones, A. M. Blinkhorn, Alexis M. Hawley
{"title":"Sensitivity to Psychologically Coercive Interrogations: A Comparison of Instructions and Expert Testimony to Improve Juror Decision-Making","authors":"Angela M. Jones, A. M. Blinkhorn, Alexis M. Hawley","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.1892438","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.1892438","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Confession evidence is powerful to jurors, even when obtained using psychologically coercive means. To assist jurors in evaluating confession evidence, courts may provide instructions or expert testimony. The current study examined the relative effectiveness of these two safeguards. Participants were randomly assigned to read about a confession that either did or did not result from the use of psychologically coercive (but legal) tactics and received either instructions, expert testimony, or no safeguard. Jurors were sensitive to psychologically coercive interrogation tactics on their own, reducing perceptions of guilt, evidence strength, detective credibility, and confession voluntariness when interrogation pressure was high. Instructions made jurors skeptical of both confessions relative to expert testimony, and in some cases, compared to the absence of any safeguard. Sensitivity was not observed for either safeguard. Results suggest jurors’ knowledge of psychologically coercive interrogation tactics is improving, but effective safeguards are still needed.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"373 - 394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90723239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}