The Process-Focused Model for Assessing Risk in Forensic Populations: Explanation, Case Example, and Initial Plans for Establishing the Necessary Evidence Base
{"title":"The Process-Focused Model for Assessing Risk in Forensic Populations: Explanation, Case Example, and Initial Plans for Establishing the Necessary Evidence Base","authors":"A. P. Natoli, E. Gottfried, Abby L. Mulay","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.2016118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Comprehensive and efficacious risk assessment must not only use multiple methods of measurement, but evaluators should employ a scientifically-based, systematic approach for integrating multimethod assessment data. One scientifically-based approach for doing this is the process-focused (PF) model, which has the additional advantage of offering a framework for empirically testing examinee-specific hypotheses relevant to the estimation of risk, as well as interaction effects among risk factors via multimethod and serial assessment approaches. However, further research on the efficacy and clinical utility of the PF model is necessary if this approach is to be used in forensic evaluation, especially when considering the standards for expert testimony. After outlining the PF model as it may be applied to risk assessment, this paper presents a case example demonstrating the introduced assessment technique. The authors then discuss the potential benefits of using the PF model for risk assessment before concluding the paper with a justification for future research and suggestions for how to begin establishing the PF model’s efficacy and clinical utility in forensic evaluations.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":"154 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.2016118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Comprehensive and efficacious risk assessment must not only use multiple methods of measurement, but evaluators should employ a scientifically-based, systematic approach for integrating multimethod assessment data. One scientifically-based approach for doing this is the process-focused (PF) model, which has the additional advantage of offering a framework for empirically testing examinee-specific hypotheses relevant to the estimation of risk, as well as interaction effects among risk factors via multimethod and serial assessment approaches. However, further research on the efficacy and clinical utility of the PF model is necessary if this approach is to be used in forensic evaluation, especially when considering the standards for expert testimony. After outlining the PF model as it may be applied to risk assessment, this paper presents a case example demonstrating the introduced assessment technique. The authors then discuss the potential benefits of using the PF model for risk assessment before concluding the paper with a justification for future research and suggestions for how to begin establishing the PF model’s efficacy and clinical utility in forensic evaluations.