P. T. Horst, M. Spreen, Esther de Vries, S. Bogaerts
{"title":"促进司法精神病学的共同决策:HKT-R Spider应用程序","authors":"P. T. Horst, M. Spreen, Esther de Vries, S. Bogaerts","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2022.2028394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Historical Clinical Future-Revised [HKT-R] is a risk assessment tool to support forensic psychiatric professionals in their clinical decisions to prevent future recidivism. A self-report version and App has been developed in co-creation with patients and professionals, the so-called HKT-R Spider App. This App aims to helps patients understand their offense-related risk- and protective factors and become more involved in their treatment. By comparing patient’s self-reports on 14 clinical and seven future-related factors with staff observations, this App aims to facilitate shared decision making. In this study, we examined whether perceptions of risk and protective factors between patients (n = 32) and staff (n = 8) corresponded or differed. Exact agreement was low. Professionals assessed patients significantly higher at risk for eight clinical and four future HKT-R factors. Patients assessed themselves significantly more at risk for psychosis. Score correlations ranged from negative to high-strong. The use of the visual HKT-Spider App is promising as a conversation starter and tool for patients and professionals for shared personalized decision making. It visualizes a treatment trajectory. Patients report that the App is user friendly, informative and useful in the dialogue with their professionals. Further implementation in the forensic field is needed.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitating Shared Decision Making in Forensic Psychiatry: The HKT-R Spider App\",\"authors\":\"P. T. Horst, M. Spreen, Esther de Vries, S. Bogaerts\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24732850.2022.2028394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Historical Clinical Future-Revised [HKT-R] is a risk assessment tool to support forensic psychiatric professionals in their clinical decisions to prevent future recidivism. A self-report version and App has been developed in co-creation with patients and professionals, the so-called HKT-R Spider App. This App aims to helps patients understand their offense-related risk- and protective factors and become more involved in their treatment. By comparing patient’s self-reports on 14 clinical and seven future-related factors with staff observations, this App aims to facilitate shared decision making. In this study, we examined whether perceptions of risk and protective factors between patients (n = 32) and staff (n = 8) corresponded or differed. Exact agreement was low. Professionals assessed patients significantly higher at risk for eight clinical and four future HKT-R factors. Patients assessed themselves significantly more at risk for psychosis. Score correlations ranged from negative to high-strong. The use of the visual HKT-Spider App is promising as a conversation starter and tool for patients and professionals for shared personalized decision making. It visualizes a treatment trajectory. Patients report that the App is user friendly, informative and useful in the dialogue with their professionals. Further implementation in the forensic field is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2022.2028394\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2022.2028394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Facilitating Shared Decision Making in Forensic Psychiatry: The HKT-R Spider App
ABSTRACT The Historical Clinical Future-Revised [HKT-R] is a risk assessment tool to support forensic psychiatric professionals in their clinical decisions to prevent future recidivism. A self-report version and App has been developed in co-creation with patients and professionals, the so-called HKT-R Spider App. This App aims to helps patients understand their offense-related risk- and protective factors and become more involved in their treatment. By comparing patient’s self-reports on 14 clinical and seven future-related factors with staff observations, this App aims to facilitate shared decision making. In this study, we examined whether perceptions of risk and protective factors between patients (n = 32) and staff (n = 8) corresponded or differed. Exact agreement was low. Professionals assessed patients significantly higher at risk for eight clinical and four future HKT-R factors. Patients assessed themselves significantly more at risk for psychosis. Score correlations ranged from negative to high-strong. The use of the visual HKT-Spider App is promising as a conversation starter and tool for patients and professionals for shared personalized decision making. It visualizes a treatment trajectory. Patients report that the App is user friendly, informative and useful in the dialogue with their professionals. Further implementation in the forensic field is needed.