{"title":"The impact of air pollution on mental health: Evidence from Texas","authors":"Kodjo Barnor","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103198","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103198","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>I estimate the impact of air pollution on mental health employing a comprehensive population-level outpatient diagnosis dataset and a quasi-experimental design. This study uses wind direction as an instrumental variable (IV) to address endogeneity concerns associated with exposure to fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), ensuring a robust analysis of mental health outcomes. The results indicate that a 1 <span><math><mtext>μ</mtext><msup><mtext>g/m</mtext><mn>3</mn></msup></math></span> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration leads to a significant increase in principal diagnoses for mental health illness in general, and specifically depression, anxiety, and stress, by 9.6, 5.3, 2.6, and 1.7 cases per 100,000 individuals, respectively. In addition, the study highlights sex-specific effects, with women more susceptible to stress and men more affected by anxiety. The findings suggest that principal diagnoses are particularly sensitive to increases in PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure. These results provide valuable insights for the development of public health strategies addressing the environmental determinants of mental health, particularly as air pollution levels continue to rise. In conclusion, this study presents strong empirical evidence linking PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure to increased mental health diagnoses, underscoring the need to consider mental health when designing policies to address air pollution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103198"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144470188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Magnitude and decomposition of the solar rebound: Evidence from Swiss households","authors":"Patrick Bigler","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103194","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103194","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines rebound effects in electricity consumption induced by solar photovoltaic (PV) adoption using detailed panel data of 58,104 single-family home residents (2008–2019) in Switzerland. I find that solar PV adoption increases a household’s electricity consumption by approximately 8 %–11 %, depending on specification. Part of this increase is driven by households switching to electric technologies, such as electric vehicles, as shown by a decomposition of the rebound effect using machine learning predicted counterfactual consumption. The solar rebound effect is mainly driven by a subsample of households that install relatively large installations and substantially adjust their consumption patterns. In contrast, more price-sensitive consumers and households that co-adopt battery storage show smaller increases in electricity usage. These findings have important implications for the evaluation of solar PV subsidies, the planning of future energy system capacity, as well as the environmental implications of solar rebound effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103194"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144366867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Guilty or scapegoat? Land consolidation and hedgerow decline","authors":"Valentin Cocco , Raja Chakir , Lauriane Mouysset","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103196","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103196","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land consolidation is a standard policy tool to reduce land fragmentation through the spatial redistribution of property rights; however, the risk of adverse effects on the landscape raises concerns about its environmental sustainability. This study investigates the landscape impacts of consolidation on the hedgerow network of Lower Normandy, France. Implementing a staggered difference-in-differences strategy on a longitudinal survey (1972–2010), we show that consolidation led to a significant reduction in hedgerow density of −14.3 m/ha (standard error: 2.33), accounting for 13.7 % of the overall decline observed in consolidated areas. We also find a diminishing impact over time of consolidation and time since consolidation, an increasing impact with higher initial hedgerow density, no spillover effect, and a negative impact on network connectivity. An outline cost-benefit analysis suggests that the social costs of uprooting hedgerows outweigh the private benefits. Overall, this paper confirms that land consolidation has significantly contributed to the decline of hedgerows with economic costs, but it challenges prevailing beliefs about the policy’s share of responsibility with respect to other landscape change factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103196"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144338467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Birth outcome effects of nitrate contamination in drinking water","authors":"Elizabeth Sorensen Montoya","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103197","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103197","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the prevalence of drinking water contamination in the United States, its health effects are not well understood. Unlike the extensive research on health impacts of air pollution, studies on water contamination are limited, mainly due to a lack of high-frequency water contamination data. To address this gap, I construct a novel dataset of monthly nitrate contamination levels in California’s community water systems linked with individual birth records. Nitrate contamination is a persistent issue in water systems in the United States, posing a potential threat to infant health. This study estimates the effect of prenatal exposure to nitrate contamination below current regulatory limits on birth outcomes. Using a panel fixed-effects approach with water system and time fixed effects, I compare birth outcomes across infants from the same water system who were exposed to differing levels of nitrate contamination during each trimester of gestation. I find that second-trimester exposure to nitrate concentrations below regulatory limits increases the likelihood of preterm birth and low birth weight by 1.2 and 1 percentage point, respectively. Relative to sample means, these estimates translate to a 15 % increase in the probability of preterm birth and a 17 % increase in the probability of low birth weight birth. Results further suggest that lowering the current regulatory limit below 5 mg/L (half the current limit) could prevent nitrate-related adverse birth outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103197"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144280770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Individual versus group-level agglomeration bonuses to conserve biodiversity","authors":"François Bareille , Raphaël Soubeyran","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103193","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103193","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agglomeration bonuses (ABs) are payments conditional on the contiguity of landowners’ conservation areas. We study whether differentiating the bonuses between <em>internal</em> (<em>within-landholding</em>) and <em>external</em> (<em>between-landholdings</em>) boundaries can improve biodiversity conservation. Using an ecological-economic model and game theory, our simulations on realistic landscapes consisting of several multi-plot landholdings reveal that such differentiation is key in determining AB cost-effectiveness. Undifferentiated ABs (where internal equal external bonuses) are the most cost-effective schemes when regulators’ budgets are low. Yet, when budgets increase, AB cost-effectiveness improves by increasingly prioritizing internal over external bonuses, until a <em>budget threshold</em> beyond which only internal bonuses remain. The complexity of compensation between plots belonging to different landowners largely explains these patterns. Given this complexity, the most cost-effective schemes are characterized by little or no cooperation between landowners. Regarding policy, we conclude that differentiated ABs are cost-effective schemes that should be part of the regulators’ toolbox.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103193"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144242415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marc N. Conte , Ethan T. Addicott , Maxanne M. Millerhaller
{"title":"Scarcity, willingness to pay for species, and imperfect substitutability with market goods","authors":"Marc N. Conte , Ethan T. Addicott , Maxanne M. Millerhaller","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103192","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103192","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impacts of biodiversity loss on human well-being depend on how much we value benefits from nature and the extent to which substitutes exist in the market for these benefits. The lack of markets for environmental goods and services, coupled with non-linearities and irreversibility in socio-environmental systems, presents unique challenges for understanding the consequences of biodiversity loss. We use a rationed-good framework to explore how species scarcity impacts marginal WTP for species and its income elasticity. We note that marginal WTP need not be decreasing in species abundance and may even be increasing, particularly if the associated suite of benefits contributes to real income via reductions in defensive expenditures. Using a new dataset of species abundance and species-level WTP estimates, we test our predictions that species abundance will impact marginal WTP and its income elasticity. Our point estimates of the income elasticity of WTP (<span><math><mi>η</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.44</mn><mo>−</mo><mn>0.51</mn></math></span>) are stable across a range of model specifications. Under the assumption of homothetic preferences, this value suggests that the species in our dataset are generally weakly substitutable with market goods (<span><math><mi>σ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1.96</mn><mo>−</mo><mn>2.27</mn></math></span>); however, we show that complementarity between species and market goods increases as the species’ level of threat increases: <span><math><mi>η</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1.13</mn></math></span>, <span><math><mi>σ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.88</mn></math></span> for critically endangered species. The observed relationships cannot be captured by the functional forms for utility used in many models driving policymaking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103192"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144338469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The impact of exposure to pipeline gas connection during pregnancy on child development: Evidence from China","authors":"Hongshan Ai, Xiaoqing Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103195","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103195","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using a pipeline gas connection program in Chinese communities, this paper estimates the long-term impact of household access to cleaner fuel during pregnancy on child development. Our difference-in-differences estimates show that in-utero exposure to pipeline gas connection increases height-for-age z-score and reduces the rates of stunting and severe stunting among children aged 0–15 years in China. We do not find statistically significant impacts on weight-related outcomes. The positive effects on child height are larger for girls, poor children, and rural children, suggesting that building public energy infrastructure during pregnancy could help reduce gender, socioeconomic, and urban-rural disparities in child development. The improvement in birth outcomes and infancy health status and the increase in household investment might be two main underlying mechanisms behind the long-term health benefits from in-utero exposure to pipeline gas connection. Our further calculations show that the pipeline gas connection program is highly cost-beneficial and should be subsidized and supported by the government to increase household access to clean energy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103195"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144242414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The market for ethical goods","authors":"Nicolas Bonneton","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103182","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103182","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper studies how consumers and producers sort themselves in markets for ethically labeled goods, such as “organic” or “child-labor-free,” considering both extrinsic and intrinsic motives. I show how greenwashing arises from the interplay between prosocial motives and equilibrium sorting. A positive demand shock leads more producers to adopt the label, including some with weaker ethical motives. This lowers the expected environmental and social quality of labeled, but also unlabeled goods. The optimal subsidy for producing ethically labeled goods is smaller than the Pigouvian subsidy, and in some cases, it may even be optimal to tax these goods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103182"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144242413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Anticipatory effects of regulating the commons","authors":"Ellen M. Bruno , Nick Hagerty","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103183","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103183","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study the regulation of common-pool resources under long implementation horizons. First, we show that future regulation can induce either anticipatory compliance or perverse incentives to accelerate extraction (a “Green Paradox”). Then, we evaluate the early effects of a major groundwater regulation in California that does not yet bind. We assemble new data and compare within pairs of neighboring agencies that face varying restrictions on extraction. Differences in future regulation do not affect measures of water-intensive investments or groundwater extraction today. This lack of anticipatory response in either direction can be explained by time preferences: high private discount rates and/or a long implementation horizon dissipate any anticipatory effects. Common-pool resources face a lower risk of perverse incentives than excludable resources, but private actors still may not comply in advance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103183"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144229683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Do microclimates matter? The health impacts of urban heat using fine-scale data","authors":"Luorao Bian","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103191","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103191","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities tend to be warmer than their suburban counterparts, a phenomenon known as the heat island effect. This effect varies significantly over time and across different neighborhoods. This study examines the health implications of neighborhood-level temperature variations and the role of urban heat in the temperature–health relationship. Using high-resolution satellite-derived surface temperature data and emergency medical service records from Northern California, the analysis employs fixed-effects Poisson regressions. The findings show that neighborhood-level extreme heat has significant adverse health effects. However, urban heat—a highly localized and predominantly anthropogenic component of overall temperature—is less harmful than temperature shifts on a larger geographic scale. This is likely because people can better adapt to urban heat. These results highlight the importance of considering both overall temperature exposure and adaptation potential in urban environments. The effects of urban heat also vary by season. While additional warmth can provide protection during colder periods, it poses substantial health risks on warmer days. Finally, policy simulations suggest that mitigating extreme urban heat could effectively reduce health risks, particularly during warm periods. Tree planting, especially in less vegetated areas, is a beneficial strategy for protecting urban populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103191"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144196429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}