To improve is to change: The effects of Risk Rating 2.0 on flood insurance demand

IF 5.9 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS
Francesc Ortega, Ivan Petkov
{"title":"To improve is to change: The effects of Risk Rating 2.0 on flood insurance demand","authors":"Francesc Ortega,&nbsp;Ivan Petkov","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We present a model of the demand for flood insurance, construct individual insurance histories for the universe of policyholders, and empirically analyze the effects of the latest NFIP reform (known as <em>Risk Rating 2.0</em>). The reform increased exits, both in the flood zone and its periphery, particularly among policyholders with subsidized rates and those paying the highest premiums. The reform also reduced new entry, had highly heterogeneous effects on insurance costs and triggered adjustments in deductibles, generally shifting flood risk toward policyholders in exchange for lower premiums. While the reform may have improved the solvency of the NFIP, it has exacerbated the decade-long decline in enrollment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 103228"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069625001123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a model of the demand for flood insurance, construct individual insurance histories for the universe of policyholders, and empirically analyze the effects of the latest NFIP reform (known as Risk Rating 2.0). The reform increased exits, both in the flood zone and its periphery, particularly among policyholders with subsidized rates and those paying the highest premiums. The reform also reduced new entry, had highly heterogeneous effects on insurance costs and triggered adjustments in deductibles, generally shifting flood risk toward policyholders in exchange for lower premiums. While the reform may have improved the solvency of the NFIP, it has exacerbated the decade-long decline in enrollment.
改善就是改变:风险等级2.0对洪水保险需求的影响
我们提出了一个洪水保险需求模型,构建了投保人的个人保险历史,并实证分析了最新的NFIP改革(称为风险评级2.0)的影响。改革增加了洪水区及其周边地区的退出,尤其是那些享受补贴利率和支付最高保费的投保人。这项改革还减少了新加入的人,对保险成本产生了高度异质性的影响,并引发了免赔额的调整,通常将洪水风险转嫁给投保人,以换取较低的保费。虽然改革可能改善了NFIP的偿付能力,但它加剧了长达十年的入学率下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Economics and Management publishes theoretical and empirical papers devoted to specific natural resources and environmental issues. For consideration, papers should (1) contain a substantial element embodying the linkage between economic systems and environmental and natural resources systems or (2) be of substantial importance in understanding the management and/or social control of the economy in its relations with the natural environment. Although the general orientation of the journal is toward economics, interdisciplinary papers by researchers in other fields of interest to resource and environmental economists will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信