Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing最新文献

{"title":"Intraoperative zero-heat-flux thermometry overestimates nasopharyngeal temperature by 0.39 °C: an observational study in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery.","authors":"Ivo F Brandes, Theodor Tirilomis, Marcus Nemeth, Johannes Wieditz, Anselm Bräuer","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01204-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01204-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) temperature management is crucial. Vesical (T_ves) and nasopharyngeal (T_NPH) temperature are usually measured. Whereas T_ves slowly responds to temperature changes, T_NPH carries the risk of bleeding. The zero-heat-flux (ZHF) temperature monitoring systems SpotOn™ (T_SpotOn), and Tcore™ (T_core) measure temperature non-invasively. We evaluated accuracy and precision of the non-invasive devices, and of T_ves compared to T_NPH for estimating temperature. In this prospective observational study in pediatric and adult patients accuracy and precision of T_SpotOn, T_core, and T_ves were analyzed using the Bland-Altman method. Proportion of differences (PoD) and Lin´s concordance correlation coefficient (LCC) were calculated. Data of 47 patients resulted in sets of matched measurements: 1073 for T_SpotOn vs. T_NPH, 874 for T_core vs. T_NPH, and 1102 for T_ves vs. T_NPH. Accuracy was - 0.39 °C for T_SpotOn, -0.09 °C for T_core, and 0.07 °C for T_ves. Precisison was between - 1.12 and 0.35 °C for T_SpotOn, -0.88 to 0.71 °C for T_core, and - 1.90 to 2.05 °C for T_ves. PoD ≤ 0.5 °C were 71% for T_SpotOn, 71% for T_core, and 60% for T_ves. LCC was 0.9455 for T_SpotOn, 0.9510 for T_core, and 0.9322 for T_ves. Temperatures below 25.2 °C (T_SpotOn) or 27.1 (T_core) could not be recorded non-invasively, but only with T_ves. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00010720.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"205-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141912859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A novel positive end-expiratory pressure titration using electrical impedance tomography in spontaneously breathing acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on mechanical ventilation: an observational study from the MaastrICCht cohort.","authors":"S J H Heines, S A M de Jongh, F H C de Jongh, R P J Segers, K M H Gilissen, I C C van der Horst, B C T van Bussel, D C J J Bergmans","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01212-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01212-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is no universally accepted method for positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration approach for patients on spontaneous mechanical ventilation (SMV). Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) guided PEEP-titration has shown promising results in controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), current implemented algorithm for PEEP titration (based on regional compliance measurements) is not applicable in SMV. Regional peak flow (RPF, defined as the highest inspiratory flow rate based on EIT at a certain PEEP level) is a new method for quantifying regional lung mechanics designed for SMV. The objective is to study whether RPF by EIT is a feasible method for PEEP titration during SMV. Single EIT measurements were performed in COVID-19 ARDS patients on SMV. Clinical (i.e., tidal volume, airway occlusion pressure, end-tidal CO₂) and mechanical (cyclic alveolar recruitment, recruitment, cumulative overdistension (OD), cumulative collapse (CL), pendelluft, and PEEP) outcomes were determined by EIT at several pre-defined PEEP thresholds (1-10% CL and the intersection of the OD and CL curves) and outcomes at all thresholds were compared to the outcomes at baseline PEEP. In total, 25 patients were included. No significant and clinically relevant differences were found between thresholds for tidal volume, end-tidal CO₂, and P0.1 compared to baseline PEEP; cyclic alveolar recruitment rates changed by -3.9% to -37.9% across thresholds; recruitment rates ranged from - 49.4% to + 79.2%; cumulative overdistension changed from - 75.9% to + 373.4% across thresholds; cumulative collapse changed from 0% to -94.3%; PEEP levels from 10 up to 14 cmH₂O were observed across thresholds compared to baseline PEEP of 10 cmH₂O. A threshold of approximately 5% cumulative collapse yields the optimum compromise between all clinical and mechanical outcomes. EIT-guided PEEP titration by the RPF approach is feasible and is linked to improved overall lung mechanics) during SMV using a threshold of approximately 5% CL. However, the long-term clinical safety and effect of this approach remain to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"127-139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821668/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of analgesia nociception index, surgical pleth index and hemodynamic parameters between patients receiving fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine analgesia for supratentorial craniotomy - an open label active-controlled randomized trial.","authors":"Rakesh T L, Shwethashri Kondavagilu Ramaprasannakumar, Dhritiman Chakrabarti, Kamath Sriganesh, Sonia Bansal","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01197-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01197-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dexmedetomidine decreases heart rate (HR) and increases high frequency (HF) component of HR variability (HRV). Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) measures nociception by analyzing the influence of respiration on HF component of HRV while surgical pleth index (SPI) derives this information from photoplethymographic signals of finger arterioles. Therefore, during administration of dexmedetomidine, reliability of ANI may vary. This study compared the changes in ANI, SPI and hemodynamics (HR and mean arterial pressure [MAP]) during various noxious stimuli with fentanyl and dexmedetomidine intraoperative analgesia. In this trial, patients undergoing elective supratentorial surgery under general anesthesia were randomized to receive either fentanyl or dexmedetomidine infusion for intraoperative analgesia. ANI (instantaneous and mean), SPI, HR and MAP were compared before and after noxious stimuli (intubation, skull pin insertion, skin incision and craniotomy) with respect to magnitude of maximum change in the variable and the time taken for the maximal change (defined as response time) between the groups. A total of 58 patients, 29 in each group were recruited into the study. At intubation, SPI changed significantly more in the fentanyl group compared to dexmedetomidine group (37 versus 20 units, p = 0.007). At skull pinning, ANI values (both instantaneous and mean) changed more in dexmedetomidine group (p = 0.024 and 0.009) with significantly longer response time (p = 0.039). There was no difference between the groups with respect to any of the variables at skin incision and craniotomy. ANI during use of dexmedetomidine and SPI while using fentanyl, might be the better choices as intraoperative nociception monitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141855703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Virtual reality simulations to alleviate fear and anxiety in children awaiting MRI: a small-scale randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Thomas Saliba, Grammatina Boitsios, Marco Preziosi, Giulia Negro, Alessandro De Leucio, Paolo Simoni","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01188-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01188-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Up to 75% of paediatric patients experience anxiety and distress before undergoing new medical procedures. Virtual reality is an interesting avenue for alleviating the stress and fear of paediatric patients due to its ability to completely immerse the child in the virtual world and thus expose them to the sights and sounds of an MRI before undergoing the exam. We aimed to explore the impact of virtual reality exposure on reducing fear and anxiety in paediatric patients scheduled to undergo an MRI. We hypothesised that patient who had undergone VR exposure before the MRI would experience lower levels of fear and anxiety and subsequently have a higher MRI success rate. We conducted a prospective randomized control trial in a tertiary paediatric hospital over three weeks. Inclusion criteria comprised children aged 4 to 14 undergoing MRI without medical contraindications for VR use. Thirty patients (16 in VR, 14 in control) were included in the study. The VR room, created in-house by a researcher, that the VR group experienced, simulated MRI room with typical sounds for up to 5 min before their actual MRI. Fear and anxiety were measured using the FACES scale before and after MRI for the control group as well as after VR exposure for the VR group. The VR group exhibited a significant reduction in anxiety post-VR exposure regarding the upcoming MRI (p = 0.009). There was no significant difference with regards to fear and anxiety between the VR and control groups before or after the MRI exam. There was no significant difference between the MRI exam success rates. VR exposure effectively reduces pre-MRI anxiety in paediatric patients who are about to undergo the exam, this is important as it alleviates the psychological burden on the child. This research is in line with previous findings, showing the validity of VR as a method of reducing pre-procedural paediatric anxiety and suggesting that complex VR experiences may not be necessary to have a significant impact. There is, however, a need for further investigation in this field using larger and MRI-naïve groups of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"183-192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141492185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Improving quantitative neuromuscular monitoring: an education initiative on stimulating electrode placement.","authors":"Madeline T Ebert, Jacob Szpernal, Julia A Vogt, Cynthia A Lien, Thomas J Ebert","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01227-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01227-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring reduces the incidence of residual neuromuscular block, but broad acceptance of monitoring has been elusive despite recommendations for quantitative monitoring for decades. Acceptance of quantitative monitoring may, in part, be related to the quality of the data from monitoring systems. This evaluation explored proper stimulating electrode positioning for electromyographic (EMG) monitoring, the impact of an educational intervention on electrode positioning and anesthesia provider (anesthesiologist, resident, anesthetist) confidence in the monitoring data from the device. In a single-center, observations of EMG electrode placement by anesthesia technicians, in 55 adult elective surgery patients were made by an independent observer. Separately, the anesthesia provider satisfaction with EMG derived data was recorded after reversal of neuromuscular block. An educational intervention then occurred on proper electrode positioning, including prior observations of electrode positioning, and prior anesthesia provider satisfaction with the EMG derived data. After the intervention, stimulating electrode position was observed with an additional 60 patients and anesthesia provider satisfaction with the data was again ascertained. The educational intervention significantly increased the proportion of ideal ulnar nerve groove electrode positioning from 74.5% to 95% (P < 0.003) and ideal wrist crease positioning (distal electrode within 2 cm of crease) from 61.8% to 96.7% (P < 0.001). Anesthesia provider confidence with EMG derived information during anesthesia delivery, increased from 67 to 90% after the education (P = 0.005). There was a significant relationship between correct stimulating electrode placement and anesthesia provider confidence in the EMG derived data on neuromuscular block status. An educational intervention to improve EMG electrode positioning proved meaningful. It increased anesthesia provider confidence in the EMG derived data during anesthesia case management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"169-174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142466617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Feasibility study of the use of a wearable vital sign patch in an intensive care unit setting.","authors":"Guylian Stevens, Michiel Larmuseau, Annelies Van Damme, Henk Vanoverschelde, Jan Heerman, Pascal Verdonck","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01207-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01207-5","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Multiple studies and review papers have concluded that early warning systems have a positive effect on clinical outcomes, patient safety and clinical performances. Despite the substantial evidence affirming the efficacy of EWS applications, persistent barriers hinder their seamless integration into clinical practice. Notably, EWS, such as the National Early Warning Score, simplify multifaceted clinical conditions into singular numerical indices, thereby risking the oversight of critical clinical indicators and nuanced fluctuations in patients' health status. Furthermore, the optimal deployment of EWS within clinical contexts remains elusive. Manual assessment of EWS parameters exacts a significant temporal toll on healthcare personnel. Addressing these impediments necessitates innovative approaches. In this regard, wearable medical technologies emerge as promising solutions capable of continual monitoring of hospitalized patients' vital signs. To overcome the barriers of the use of early warning scores, wearable medical technology has the potential to continuously monitor vital signs of hospitalised patients. However, a fundamental inquiry arises regarding the comparability of their reliability to the current used golden standards. This inquiry underscores the imperative for rigorous evaluation and validation of wearable medical technologies to ascertain their efficacy in augmenting extant clinical practices. This prospective, single-center study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of heart rate and respiratory rate measurements obtained from the Vivalink Cardiac patch in comparison to the ECG-based monitoring system utilized at AZ Maria Middelares Hospital in Ghent. Specifically, the study focused on assessing the concordance between the data obtained from the Vivalink Cardiac patch and the established ECG-based monitoring system among a cohort of ten post-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Of these patients, five were undergoing mechanical ventilation post-surgery, while the remaining five were not. The study proceeded by initially comparing the data recorded by the Vivalink Cardiac patch with that of the ECG-based monitoring system. Subsequently, the data obtained from both the Vivalink Cardiac patch and the ECG-based monitoring system were juxtaposed with the information derived from the ventilation machine, thereby providing a comprehensive analysis of the patch's performance in monitoring vital signs within the ICU setting. For heart rate, the Vivalink Cardiac patch was on average within a 5% error range of the ECG-based monitoring system during 85.11±10.81% of the measured time. For respiratory rate this was during 40.55±17.28% of the measured time. Spearman's correlation coefficient showed a very high correlation of &lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi&gt;ρ&lt;/mi&gt; &lt;mo&gt;=&lt;/mo&gt; &lt;mn&gt;0.9&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt; &lt;/math&gt; 8 for heart rate and a moderate correlation of &lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi&gt;ρ&lt;/mi&gt; &lt;mo&gt;=&lt;/mo&gt; &lt;mn&gt;0.66&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt; &lt;/math&gt; for respiratory rate. In comparison with th","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"245-256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142000063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Time to maximum pupil constriction is variable in neurocritical care patients.","authors":"Abdulkadir Kamal, Emerson B Nairon, Anna Bashmakov, Salah G Aoun, DaiWai M Olson","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01234-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01234-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative pupillometry (QP) use has grown exponentially. Each QP scan captures images of the pupil before, during, and after light exposure to provide component measures of the pupillary light reflex (PLR). This study explores if the time to maximum constriction (tMC) is uniform among neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) patients. The study enrolled 50 NSICU patients with normal PLR values in a cross-sectional study and adhered to the standard of care for pupil assessments to collect data on tMC within (comparing left eye and right eye) and between patients. The mean tMC of 0.97 (0.17) s was normally distributed across all patients and ranged from 0.46 s to 1.35 s. The mean tMC was similar for the left pupil (0.98 [0.16]s) and right pupil (0.96 [0.18]s; P =.546). The within-subject mean difference (left versus right eye) tMC was 0.13 (0.12)s and ranged from 0.0 to 0.56 s. The between-subject mean tMC was 0.97 (0.17) s and ranged from 0.46 s to 1.35 s. The tMC does not occur at a fixed point in time. Clinical applications that seek to characterize pupil health should account for varied tMC and explore relationships to discrete outcomes to determine the clinical usefulness of tMC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142466618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Performance of pulse oximeters as a function of race compared to skin pigmentation: a single center retrospective study.","authors":"Audrey I Marlar, Bradley K Knabe, Yasamin Taghikhan, Richard L Applegate, Neal W Fleming","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01211-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01211-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulse oximetry (SpO₂) is a critical monitor for assessing oxygenation status and guiding therapy in critically ill patients. Race has been identified as a potential source of SpO₂ error, with consequent bias and inequities in healthcare. This study was designed to evaluate the incidence of occult hypoxemia and accuracy of pulse oximetry associated with the Massey-Martin scale and characterize the relationship between Massey scores and self-identified race. This retrospective single institute study utilized the Massey-Martin scale as a quantitative assessment of skin pigmentation. These values were recorded peri-operatively in patients enrolled in unrelated clinical trials. The electronic medical record was utilized to obtain demographics, arterial blood gas values, and time matched SpO₂ values for each PaO₂ ≤ 125 mmHg recorded throughout their hospitalizations. Differences between SaO₂ and SpO₂ were compared as a function of both Massey score and self-reported race. 4030 paired SaO₂-SpO₂ values were available from 579 patients. The average error (SaO₂-SpO₂) ± SD was 0.23 ± 2.6%. Statistically significant differences were observed within Massey scores and among races, with average errors that ranged from - 0.39 ± 2.3 to 0.53 ± 2.5 and - 0.55 ± 2.1 to 0.37 ± 2.7, respectively. Skin color varied widely within each self-identified race category. There was no clinically significant association between error rates and Massey-Martin scale grades and no clinically significant difference in accuracy observed between self-reported Black and White patients. In addition, self-reported race is not an appropriate surrogate for skin color.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"119-125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821791/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Response to ASNM intraoperative SSEP position statement.","authors":"J Richard Toleikis, Christopher Pace, Faisal R Jahangiri, Laura B Hemmer, Sandra C Toleikis","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01247-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01247-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This correspondence is in response to Dr. David Allison's comments to the Editor, regarding the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring's (ASNM) updated intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring position statement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"259-260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"High frequency variability index in predicting postoperative pain in video/robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under combined general anesthesia and peripheral nerve block: an observational study.","authors":"Keisuke Yoshida, Takayuki Hasegawa, Takahiro Hakozaki, Tatsumi Yakushiji, Yuzo Iseki, Yuya Itakura, Shinju Obara, Satoki Inoue","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01205-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01205-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high frequency variability index (HFVI)/analgesia nociception index (ANI) is purported to assess the balance between nociception and analgesia in patients under general anesthesia. This observational study investigated whether intraoperative HFVI/ANI correlates with postoperative pain in patients performed with nerve block under general anesthesia in video/robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS/RATS). We investigated whether maximum postoperative pain at rest and postoperative morphine consumption are associated with HFVI/ANI just before extubation, mean HFVI/ANI during anesthesia, the difference in HFVI/ANI between before and 5 min after the start of surgery, and the difference in HFVI/ANI between before and 5 min after the nerve block. Data obtained from 48 patients were analyzed. We found no significant association between HFVI/ANI just before extubation and postoperative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that moderate (NRS > 3) or severe (NRS > 7) postoperative pain could not be predicted by HFVI/ANI just before extubation. In addition, there were no associations between postoperative morphine consumption and HFVI/ANI at any time points. The present study demonstrated that it is difficult to predict the degree of postoperative pain in patients undergoing VATS/RATS under general anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve block, by using HFVI/ANI obtained at multiple time points during general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142004349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}