{"title":"High frequency variability index in predicting postoperative pain in video/robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under combined general anesthesia and peripheral nerve block: an observational study.","authors":"Keisuke Yoshida, Takayuki Hasegawa, Takahiro Hakozaki, Tatsumi Yakushiji, Yuzo Iseki, Yuya Itakura, Shinju Obara, Satoki Inoue","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01205-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01205-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high frequency variability index (HFVI)/analgesia nociception index (ANI) is purported to assess the balance between nociception and analgesia in patients under general anesthesia. This observational study investigated whether intraoperative HFVI/ANI correlates with postoperative pain in patients performed with nerve block under general anesthesia in video/robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS/RATS). We investigated whether maximum postoperative pain at rest and postoperative morphine consumption are associated with HFVI/ANI just before extubation, mean HFVI/ANI during anesthesia, the difference in HFVI/ANI between before and 5 min after the start of surgery, and the difference in HFVI/ANI between before and 5 min after the nerve block. Data obtained from 48 patients were analyzed. We found no significant association between HFVI/ANI just before extubation and postoperative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that moderate (NRS > 3) or severe (NRS > 7) postoperative pain could not be predicted by HFVI/ANI just before extubation. In addition, there were no associations between postoperative morphine consumption and HFVI/ANI at any time points. The present study demonstrated that it is difficult to predict the degree of postoperative pain in patients undergoing VATS/RATS under general anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve block, by using HFVI/ANI obtained at multiple time points during general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142004349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cosmin Bălan, Cristian Boroş, Bianca Moroşanu, Antonia Coman, Iulia Stănculea, Liana Văleanu, Mihai Şefan, Bogdan Pavel, Ana-Maria Ioan, Adrian Wong, Şerban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi
{"title":"Nociception level index-directed superficial parasternal intercostal plane block vs erector spinae plane block in open-heart surgery: a propensity matched non-inferiority clinical trial.","authors":"Cosmin Bălan, Cristian Boroş, Bianca Moroşanu, Antonia Coman, Iulia Stănculea, Liana Văleanu, Mihai Şefan, Bogdan Pavel, Ana-Maria Ioan, Adrian Wong, Şerban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01236-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01236-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This single-center study explored the efficacy of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIPB) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in opioid-sparing within Nociception Level (NOL) index-directed anesthesia for elective open-heart surgery. After targeted propensity matching, 19 adult patients given general anesthesia with preincisional SPIPB were compared to 33 with preincisional ESPB. We hypothesized that SPIPB is non-inferior to ESPB in reducing total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, with a non-inferiority margin (δ) set at 0.1 mg. Intraoperative fentanyl dosing targeted a NOL index ≤ 25. Postoperatively, paracetamol 1 g 6-hourly and morphine for numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 were administered. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, as the confidence interval for the median difference of 0.1 mg (95% CI 0.05-0.15) crossed the predefined δ, with the lower bound falling below and the upper bound exceeding δ, p = 0.558. SPIPB led to higher postoperative morphine use at 24 and 48 h: 0 (0-40.6) vs. 59.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.001 and 22.2 (0-42.6) vs. 63.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg<sup>-1</sup>, p = 0.001. Four times fewer SPIPB patients remained morphine-free at 48 h, p < 0.001, and their time to first morphine dose was three times shorter compared to ESPB patients, p = 0.001. SPIPB led to higher time-weighted average NRS scores at rest, 1 (0-1) vs. 1 (1-2), p = 0.004, and with movement, 2 (1-2) vs. 3 (2-3), p = 0.002, calculated over the 48-h period post-extubation. The SPIPB group had a significantly higher average NOL index, p = 0.003, and greater NOL index variability, p = 0.027. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, with SPIPB leading to higher postoperative morphine use, higher pain scores, and reduced nociception control.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"59-72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Iris Cramer, Rik van Esch, Cindy Verstappen, Carla Kloeze, Bas van Bussel, Sander Stuijk, Jan Bergmans, Marcel van 't Veer, Svitlana Zinger, Leon Montenij, R Arthur Bouwman, Lukas Dekker
{"title":"Accuracy of remote, video-based supraventricular tachycardia detection in patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion: a prospective cohort.","authors":"Iris Cramer, Rik van Esch, Cindy Verstappen, Carla Kloeze, Bas van Bussel, Sander Stuijk, Jan Bergmans, Marcel van 't Veer, Svitlana Zinger, Leon Montenij, R Arthur Bouwman, Lukas Dekker","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01263-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01263-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unobtrusive pulse rate monitoring by continuous video recording, based on remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), might enable early detection of perioperative arrhythmias in general ward patients. However, the accuracy of an rPPG-based machine learning model to monitor the pulse rate during sinus rhythm and arrhythmias is unknown. We conducted a prospective, observational diagnostic study in a cohort with a high prevalence of arrhythmias (patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion). Pulse rate was assessed with rPPG via a visible light camera and ECG as reference, before and after cardioversion. A cardiologist categorized ECGs into normal sinus rhythm or arrhythmias requiring further investigation. A supervised machine learning model (support vector machine with Gaussian kernel) was trained using rPPG signal features from 60-s intervals and validated via leave-one-subject-out. Pulse rate measurement performance was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis. Of 72 patients screened, 51 patients were included in the analyses, including 444 60-s intervals with normal sinus rhythm and 1130 60-s intervals of clinically relevant arrhythmias. The model showed robust discrimination (AUC 0.95 [0.93-0.96]) and good calibration. For pulse rate measurement, the bias and limits of agreement for sinus rhythm were 1.21 [- 8.60 to 11.02], while for arrhythmia, they were - 7.45 [- 35.75 to 20.86]. The machine learning model accurately identified sinus rhythm and arrhythmias using rPPG in real-world conditions. Heart rate underestimation during arrhythmias highlights the need for optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143065953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Effect of postoperative peripheral nerve blocks on the analgesia nociception index under propofol anesthesia: an observational study.","authors":"Motoi Kumagai, Naoto Yamada, Masahiro Wakimoto, Shohei Ogawa, Sho Watanabe, Kotaro Sato, Kenji S Suzuki","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01264-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01264-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The analgesia nociception index (ANI), also referred to as the high frequency variability index (HFVI), is reported to be an objective measure of nociception. This study investigated changes in ANI after peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) under general anesthesia. Understanding these changes could enhance assessment of PNB efficacy before emergence from general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 30 patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery. After surgery, median and maximum ANI values were recorded during two periods: a 5-minute period before PNB and a 20-minute period after PNB. The numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was assessed twice: immediately after emergence from general anesthesia (N1) and the maximum pain experienced by the following morning after PNB effects subsided (N2). The difference in ANI before and after PNB was tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ANI significantly increased after PNB in both the median (pre vs. post PNB value: 53.5 [44.0-68.0] vs. 59.0 [47.0-78.3], median [interquartile range]; P < 0.05) and maximum values (64.0 [56.3-79.5] vs. 74.5 [61.5-85.3]; P < 0.01). Secondary analysis revealed that significant ANI increases in both median (48.0 [42.3-66.5] vs. 61.0 [50.0-76.5]; P < 0.01) and maximum values (58.5 [50.3-75.3] vs. 76.0 [71.8-83.5]; P < 0.01) in the 18 cases with N2 ≥ 4 whereas no statistical differences were observed in the 12 cases with N2 < 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increased ANI value after PNB under propofol anesthesia may be a valuable indicator for assessing PNB efficacy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>UMIN000050334.</p><p><strong>Date of registration: </strong>February 28, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143065992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hana M Broulikova, Jacqueline Wallage, Luca Roggeveen, Lucas Fleuren, Tingjie Guo, Paul W G Elbers, Judith E Bosmans
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of data driven personalised antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock.","authors":"Hana M Broulikova, Jacqueline Wallage, Luca Roggeveen, Lucas Fleuren, Tingjie Guo, Paul W G Elbers, Judith E Bosmans","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01257-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01257-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study provides an economic evaluation of bedside, data-driven, and model-informed precision dosing of antibiotics in comparison with usual care among critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This economic evaluation was conducted alongside an AutoKinetics randomized controlled trial. Effect measures included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), mortality and pharmacokinetic target attainment. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Missing data was multiply imputed, and bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty. Differences in effects and costs were estimated using bivariate regression and used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the intervention group had higher costs (€42,684 vs. 39,475), lower mortality (42% vs. 49%), more QALYs (0.184 vs. 0.153), and higher pharmacokinetic target attainment (69% vs. 48%). Only the difference for target attainment was found statistically significant. An additional €18,129, €55,576, and €123,493 needs to be invested to attain the targeted plasma levels for one more patient, to save one life and gain one QALY, respectively. The probability of cost-effectiveness for all effect outcomes is below 60% for most acceptable willingness-to-pay thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data-driven personalised antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients as implemented in the AutoKinetics trial cannot be recommended for implementation as a cost-effective intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was prospectively registered at Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), NL6501/NTR6689 on 25 August 2017 and at the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), 2017-002478-37 on 6 November 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143032854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tommi Bergman, Maija-Liisa Kalliomäki, Mika Särkelä, Jarkko Harju
{"title":"The use of the surgical pleth index to guide anaesthesia in gastroenterological surgery: a randomised controlled study.","authors":"Tommi Bergman, Maija-Liisa Kalliomäki, Mika Särkelä, Jarkko Harju","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01262-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01262-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The measurement of nociception and the optimisation of intraoperative antinociceptive medication could potentially improve the conduct of anaesthesia, especially in the older population. The Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) is one of the monitoring methods presently used for the detection of nociceptive stimulus. Eighty patients aged 50 years and older who were scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery were randomised and divided into a study group and a control group. In the study group, the SPI was used to guide the administration of remifentanil during surgery. In the control group, the SPI value was concealed, and remifentanil administration was based on the clinical evaluation of the attending anaesthesiologist. The primary endpoint of this study was intraoperative remifentanil consumption. In addition, we compared the durations of intraoperative hypotension and hypertension. No difference in intraoperative remifentanil consumption (4.5 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup> vs. 5.6 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup>, p = 0.14) was found. Furthermore, there was no difference in the proportion of hypotensive time (mean arterial pressure, MAP < 65) (3.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.40). However, in the subgroup of patients who underwent operation with invasive blood pressure monitoring, there was less severe hypotension (MAP < 55) (0.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.02) and intermediate hypotension (MAP < 65) (10.2% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.07) in the treatment group, even though remifentanil consumption was higher (3.5 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup> vs. 5.1 µg kg<sup>- 1</sup>h<sup>- 1</sup>p = 0.03). The use of SPI guidance for the administration of remifentanil during surgery did not help to reduce the remifentanil consumption. However, the results from invasively monitored study group suggest more timely administered opioid when SPI was used.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander Edthofer, Dina Ettel, Gerhard Schneider, Andreas Körner, Matthias Kreuzer
{"title":"Entropy of difference works similarly to permutation entropy for the assessment of anesthesia and sleep EEG despite the lower computational effort.","authors":"Alexander Edthofer, Dina Ettel, Gerhard Schneider, Andreas Körner, Matthias Kreuzer","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01258-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01258-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>EEG monitoring during anesthesia or for diagnosing sleep disorders is a common standard. Different approaches for measuring the important information of this biosignal are used. The most often and efficient one for entropic parameters is permutation entropy as it can distinguish the vigilance states in the different settings. Due to high calculation times, it has mostly been used for low orders, although it shows good results even for higher orders. Entropy of difference has a similar way of extracting information from the EEG as permutation entropy. Both parameters and different algorithms for encoding the associated patterns in the signal are described. The runtimes of both entropic measures are compared, not only for the needed encoding but also for calculating the value itself. The mutual information that both parameters extract is measured with the AUC for a linear discriminant analysis classifier. Entropy of difference shows a smaller calculation time than permutation entropy. The reduction is much larger for higher orders, some of them can even only be computed with the entropy of difference. The distinguishing of the vigilance states between both measures is similar as the AUC values for the classification do not differ significantly. As the runtimes for the entropy of difference are smaller than for the permutation entropy, even though the performance stays the same, we state the entropy of difference could be a useful method for analyzing EEG data. Higher orders of entropic features may also be investigated better and more easily.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142894841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Clemens Miller, Anselm Bräuer, Johannes Wieditz, Marcus Nemeth
{"title":"What is the minimum time interval for reporting of intraoperative core body temperature measurements in pediatric anesthesia? A secondary analysis.","authors":"Clemens Miller, Anselm Bräuer, Johannes Wieditz, Marcus Nemeth","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01254-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01254-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given that perioperative normothermia represents a quality parameter in pediatric anesthesia, numerous studies have been conducted on temperature measurement, albeit with heterogeneous measurement intervals, ranging from 30 s to fifteen minutes. We aimed to determine the minimum time interval for reporting of intraoperative core body temperature across commonly used measurement intervals in children. Data were extracted from the records of 65 children who had participated in another clinical study and analyzed using a quasibinomial mixed linear model. Documented artifacts, like probe dislocations or at the end of anesthesia, were removed. Primary outcome was the respective probability of failing to detect a temperature change of 0.2 °C or more at any one measurement point at 30 s, one minute, two minutes, five minutes, ten minutes, and fifteen minutes, considering an expected probability of less than 5% to be acceptable. Secondary outcomes included the probabilities of failing to detect hypothermia (< 36.0 °C) and hyperthermia (> 38.0 °C). Following the removal of 4,909 exclusions, the remaining 222,366 timestamped measurements (representing just over 60 h of monitoring) were analyzed. The median measurement time was 45 min. The expected probabilities of failing to detect a temperature change of 0.2 °C or more were 0.2% [95%-CI 0.0-0.7], 0.5% [95%-CI 0.0-1.2], 1.5% [95%-CI 0.2-2.6], 4.8% [95%-CI 2.7-6.9], 22.4% [95%-CI 18.3-26.4], and 31.9% [95%-CI 27.3-36.4], respectively. Probabilities for the detection of hyperthermia (n = 9) were lower and omitted for hypothermia due to low prevalence (n = 1). In conclusion, the core body temperature should be reported at intervals of no more than five minutes to ensure the detection of any temperature change in normothermic ranges. Further studies should focus on hypothermic and hyperthermic ranges.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zahra Moaiyeri, Jumana Mustafa, Massimo Lamperti, Francisco A Lobo
{"title":"Intraoperative use of processed electroencephalogram in a quaternary center: a quality improvement audit.","authors":"Zahra Moaiyeri, Jumana Mustafa, Massimo Lamperti, Francisco A Lobo","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01189-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01189-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although intraoperative electroencephalography (EEG) is not consensual among anesthesiologists, growing evidence supports its use to titrate anesthetic drugs, assess the level of arousal/consciousness, and detect ischemic cerebrovascular events; in addition, intraoperative EEG monitoring may decrease the incidence of postoperative neurocognitive disorders. Based on the known and potential benefits of intraoperative EEG monitoring, an educational program dedicated to staff anesthesiologists, residents of Anesthesiology and anesthesia technicians was started at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi in May 2022 and completed in June 2022, aiming to have all patients undergoing general anesthesia with adequate brain monitoring and following international initiatives promoting perioperative brain health. All the surgical cases performed under General Anesthesia at 24 daily locations were prospectively inspected during 15 consecutive working days in March 2023. The use or absence of a processed EEG monitor was registered. Of 379 surgical cases distributed by 24 locations under General Anesthesia, 233 cases (61%) had processed EEG monitoring. The specialty with the highest use of EEG monitoring was Cardiothoracic Surgery, with 100% of cases, followed by interventional Cardiology (90%) and Vascular Surgery (75%). Otorhinolaryngology (29%), Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (25%), and Interventional Pulmonology (20%) were the areas with the lowest use of EEG monitoring. Of note, in the Neuroradiology suite, no processed EEG monitor was used in cases under General Anesthesia. We identified a reasonable use of EEG monitoring during general anesthesia, unfortunately not reaching our target of 100%. The educational and support program previously implemented within the Anesthesiology Institute needs to be continued and improved, including workshops, online discussions, and journal club sessions, to increase the use of EEG monitoring in underused areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"1263-1268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141426989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Moritz Flick, Anneke Lohr, Friederike Weidemann, Ashkan Naebian, Phillip Hoppe, Kristen K Thomsen, Linda Krause, Karim Kouz, Bernd Saugel
{"title":"Post-anesthesia care unit hypotension in low-risk patients recovering from non-cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Moritz Flick, Anneke Lohr, Friederike Weidemann, Ashkan Naebian, Phillip Hoppe, Kristen K Thomsen, Linda Krause, Karim Kouz, Bernd Saugel","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01176-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10877-024-01176-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intraoperative hypotension is common and associated with organ injury. Hypotension can not only occur during surgery, but also thereafter. After surgery, most patients are treated in post-anesthesia care units (PACU). The incidence of PACU hypotension is largely unknown - presumably in part because arterial pressure is usually monitored intermittently in PACU patients. We therefore aimed to evaluate the incidence, duration, and severity of PACU hypotension in low-risk patients recovering from non-cardiac surgery. In this observational study, we performed blinded continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring with finger-cuffs (ClearSight system; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) in 100 patients recovering from non-cardiac surgery in the PACU. We defined PACU hypotension as a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg. Patients had continuous finger-cuff monitoring for a median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) of 64 (44 to 91) minutes. Only three patients (3%) had PACU hypotension for at least one consecutive minute. These three patients had 4, 4, and 2 cumulative minutes of PACU hypotension; areas under a MAP of 65 mmHg of 17, 9, and 9 mmHg x minute; and time-weighted averages MAP less than 65 mmHg of 0.5, 0.3, and 0.2 mmHg. The median volume of crystalloid fluid patients were given during PACU treatment was 200 (100 to 400) ml. None was given colloids or a vasopressor during PACU treatment. In low-risk patients recovering from non-cardiac surgery, the incidence of PACU hypotension was very low and the few episodes of PACU hypotension were short and of modest severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"1331-1336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604811/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140957727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}