Michele Introna, Carla Carozzi, Andrea Gentile, Riccarda Girasole, Marco Gemma, Jeroen V Koomen, Michel M R F Struys, Johannes P van Den Berg
{"title":"重症监护病房的靶控输注:范围综述。","authors":"Michele Introna, Carla Carozzi, Andrea Gentile, Riccarda Girasole, Marco Gemma, Jeroen V Koomen, Michel M R F Struys, Johannes P van Den Berg","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01356-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems, originally developed for intravenous drug administration of anesthetic drugs, enable precise drug delivery based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models. While widely used in the operating room, their application in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains limited despite the complexity of drug dosing in critically ill patients. This scoping review evaluates existing evidence on the use of TCI systems in ICU settings, focusing on sedation, analgesia, and antibiotic administration. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline and the Cochrane Library up to August 2024. Studies involving adult ICU patients receiving TCI for any drug were included. Data were extracted on study design, PKPD models, performance metrics, and clinical endpoints. A total of 281 studies were identified; 14 focused on sedatives, particularly propofol and remifentanil, using the Marsh and Minto models. TCI was associated with more stable sedation, improved titration, and fewer adverse events. Evidence on dexmedetomidine and midazolam was limited. Only three studies explored antibiotic TCI, mainly for vancomycin and cefepime, showing potential but lacking robust clinical validation. In conclusion, while current findings are promising, the evidence base supporting TCI-especially in the context of newer, generalized pharmacokinetic models and antibiotics-remains insufficient, and its broader application requires further clinical research and model validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target controlled infusion in the intensive care unit: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Introna, Carla Carozzi, Andrea Gentile, Riccarda Girasole, Marco Gemma, Jeroen V Koomen, Michel M R F Struys, Johannes P van Den Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-025-01356-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems, originally developed for intravenous drug administration of anesthetic drugs, enable precise drug delivery based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models. While widely used in the operating room, their application in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains limited despite the complexity of drug dosing in critically ill patients. This scoping review evaluates existing evidence on the use of TCI systems in ICU settings, focusing on sedation, analgesia, and antibiotic administration. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline and the Cochrane Library up to August 2024. Studies involving adult ICU patients receiving TCI for any drug were included. Data were extracted on study design, PKPD models, performance metrics, and clinical endpoints. A total of 281 studies were identified; 14 focused on sedatives, particularly propofol and remifentanil, using the Marsh and Minto models. TCI was associated with more stable sedation, improved titration, and fewer adverse events. Evidence on dexmedetomidine and midazolam was limited. Only three studies explored antibiotic TCI, mainly for vancomycin and cefepime, showing potential but lacking robust clinical validation. In conclusion, while current findings are promising, the evidence base supporting TCI-especially in the context of newer, generalized pharmacokinetic models and antibiotics-remains insufficient, and its broader application requires further clinical research and model validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01356-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01356-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Target controlled infusion in the intensive care unit: a scoping review.
Target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems, originally developed for intravenous drug administration of anesthetic drugs, enable precise drug delivery based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models. While widely used in the operating room, their application in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains limited despite the complexity of drug dosing in critically ill patients. This scoping review evaluates existing evidence on the use of TCI systems in ICU settings, focusing on sedation, analgesia, and antibiotic administration. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline and the Cochrane Library up to August 2024. Studies involving adult ICU patients receiving TCI for any drug were included. Data were extracted on study design, PKPD models, performance metrics, and clinical endpoints. A total of 281 studies were identified; 14 focused on sedatives, particularly propofol and remifentanil, using the Marsh and Minto models. TCI was associated with more stable sedation, improved titration, and fewer adverse events. Evidence on dexmedetomidine and midazolam was limited. Only three studies explored antibiotic TCI, mainly for vancomycin and cefepime, showing potential but lacking robust clinical validation. In conclusion, while current findings are promising, the evidence base supporting TCI-especially in the context of newer, generalized pharmacokinetic models and antibiotics-remains insufficient, and its broader application requires further clinical research and model validation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.