Alexis Barat, Anne Wojtanowski, Hélène Behal, Mathilde Flocteil, Stéphane Leteurtre, Julien De Jonckheere, Morgan Recher
{"title":"评估镇痛伤害感觉指数(ANI)作为深度镇静,青春期前患者不适的指标。","authors":"Alexis Barat, Anne Wojtanowski, Hélène Behal, Mathilde Flocteil, Stéphane Leteurtre, Julien De Jonckheere, Morgan Recher","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01355-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) has been used to assess discomfort in anesthetized adults. The COMFORT Behavior Scale (CBS) is recommended for assessing discomfort in intubated and sedated children. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the validity and performance of the ANI as an indicator of discomfort in intubated, ventilated children in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). A prospective, non-interventional, single-center pilot study was conducted between June 1st, 2021, and November 31st, 2023. Intubated, sedated, prepubescent patients aged between 2 and 10 years (for girls) or between 2 and 12 years (for boys) were included. The instantaneous ANI (ANIi) and the mean ANI (ANIm) were recorded continuously during care procedures. Data were analyzed before (period (P)1), during (P2) and after (P3) care procedures. 50 patients were included; the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 7 [4; 9] years. The ANIi decreased significantly between P1 and P2 (median [IQR]: 59 [45; 80] vs. 33 [26; 42], respectively; p < 0.0001) and increased significantly between P2 and P3 (33 [26; 42] vs. 51 [33; 72], respectively; p < 0.0001). The CBS score increased significantly between P2 and P3 (median [IQR]: 10 [7; 13] vs. 12 [8; 15], respectively; p < 0.0001). The ANIi was able to discriminate between over-analgosedation (defined as a CBS score < 10) and normal analgosedation (AUROC = 0.694 during P1).The ANI might be a good candidate for assessing discomfort in intubated, prepubescent patients in the PICU.Trial Registration: NCT04913038.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) as an indicator of discomfort in deeply sedated, prepubescent patients.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Barat, Anne Wojtanowski, Hélène Behal, Mathilde Flocteil, Stéphane Leteurtre, Julien De Jonckheere, Morgan Recher\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-025-01355-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) has been used to assess discomfort in anesthetized adults. The COMFORT Behavior Scale (CBS) is recommended for assessing discomfort in intubated and sedated children. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the validity and performance of the ANI as an indicator of discomfort in intubated, ventilated children in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). A prospective, non-interventional, single-center pilot study was conducted between June 1st, 2021, and November 31st, 2023. Intubated, sedated, prepubescent patients aged between 2 and 10 years (for girls) or between 2 and 12 years (for boys) were included. The instantaneous ANI (ANIi) and the mean ANI (ANIm) were recorded continuously during care procedures. Data were analyzed before (period (P)1), during (P2) and after (P3) care procedures. 50 patients were included; the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 7 [4; 9] years. The ANIi decreased significantly between P1 and P2 (median [IQR]: 59 [45; 80] vs. 33 [26; 42], respectively; p < 0.0001) and increased significantly between P2 and P3 (33 [26; 42] vs. 51 [33; 72], respectively; p < 0.0001). The CBS score increased significantly between P2 and P3 (median [IQR]: 10 [7; 13] vs. 12 [8; 15], respectively; p < 0.0001). The ANIi was able to discriminate between over-analgosedation (defined as a CBS score < 10) and normal analgosedation (AUROC = 0.694 during P1).The ANI might be a good candidate for assessing discomfort in intubated, prepubescent patients in the PICU.Trial Registration: NCT04913038.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01355-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01355-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
镇痛伤害感觉指数(ANI)已被用于评估成人麻醉后的不适。舒适行为量表(CBS)被推荐用于评估插管和镇静儿童的不适。本研究的主要目的是评估ANI作为儿科重症监护病房(PICU)插管、通气儿童不适指标的有效性和性能。在2021年6月1日至2023年11月31日期间进行了一项前瞻性、非干预性、单中心试点研究。包括插管,镇静,年龄在2至10岁(女孩)或2至12岁(男孩)之间的青春期前患者。在护理过程中连续记录瞬时ANI (ANIi)和平均ANI (ANIm)。数据分析前(P)1期),期间(P2)和后(P3)护理程序。纳入50例患者;年龄中位数(四分位数间距[IQR])为7岁[4];9年。P1和P2之间的ANIi显著降低(中位[IQR]: 59 [45; 80] vs. 33 [26; 42]
Evaluation of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) as an indicator of discomfort in deeply sedated, prepubescent patients.
The Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) has been used to assess discomfort in anesthetized adults. The COMFORT Behavior Scale (CBS) is recommended for assessing discomfort in intubated and sedated children. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the validity and performance of the ANI as an indicator of discomfort in intubated, ventilated children in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). A prospective, non-interventional, single-center pilot study was conducted between June 1st, 2021, and November 31st, 2023. Intubated, sedated, prepubescent patients aged between 2 and 10 years (for girls) or between 2 and 12 years (for boys) were included. The instantaneous ANI (ANIi) and the mean ANI (ANIm) were recorded continuously during care procedures. Data were analyzed before (period (P)1), during (P2) and after (P3) care procedures. 50 patients were included; the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 7 [4; 9] years. The ANIi decreased significantly between P1 and P2 (median [IQR]: 59 [45; 80] vs. 33 [26; 42], respectively; p < 0.0001) and increased significantly between P2 and P3 (33 [26; 42] vs. 51 [33; 72], respectively; p < 0.0001). The CBS score increased significantly between P2 and P3 (median [IQR]: 10 [7; 13] vs. 12 [8; 15], respectively; p < 0.0001). The ANIi was able to discriminate between over-analgosedation (defined as a CBS score < 10) and normal analgosedation (AUROC = 0.694 during P1).The ANI might be a good candidate for assessing discomfort in intubated, prepubescent patients in the PICU.Trial Registration: NCT04913038.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.