The Summa Halensis最新文献

{"title":"Odo Rigaldi, Alexander of Hales and the Summa Halensis","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127514946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Eriugenian Influence in the Summa Halensis: A Synthetic Tradition","authors":"Catherine Kavanagh","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-009","url":null,"abstract":": This paper will consider the question as to whether the thought of Eriugena is a source for the Eastern Christian ideas found in the Summa Halensis. I shall first give a general historical overview of the fate of Eriugenian texts and ideas in this pe-riod. Following that, I shall examine the Eriugenian element in an important section of the Parisian Corpus Dionysiacum (Mystical Theology V), and the anonymous Liber de causis primis et secundis , which gives us something of a key to the 13 th reading of Eriugena, and helps explain the harshness of later reaction to him. Finally, I shall examine a key example from the Summa in which this debate from the previous five centuries emerges, and conclude. For the purposes of this comparison, I shall focus on one problem, that is, the problem of Eriugena ’ s presentation of the Primordial Causes. concealed in the darkness of their excellence, do not cease to appear by being brought forth into the light, as it were, of knowledge in their effects.³","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117165018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Anselm’s Influence on the Teaching of the Summa Halensis on Redemption","authors":"A. Rosato","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-013","url":null,"abstract":"It has long been recognized that the Summa Halensiswas one of the first texts to extensively engage the arguments of Anselm’s Cur Deus homo. As a result of this engagement, Anselm can rightly be thought of as exercising a great deal of influence on how the Summa understands Christ’s redemptive work. We see this influence, for instance, when the Summa takes up questions Anselm poses about redemption, such as whether satisfaction is necessary for sin or whether only a God-man can make satisfaction.Without denying the influence of Anselm on the soteriology of the Summa Halensis, this chapter focuses primarily on how the Summa both modifies Anselm’s ideas and supplements them. Thus, I examine how the Summa employs the distinction between God’s absolute and ordained power to modify Anselm’s claims regarding the manner in which certain aspects of God’s plan of redemption are deemed necessary. Also, I show that Peter Lombard’s Sentences significantly shape how the Summa interprets what Anselm writes about Christ’s satisfaction and merit. Finally, I consider how the Summa draws on other authorities such as Gregory the Great and John Damascene to supplement Anselm’s account of redemption. Alexander of Hales was one of the first 13-century theologians to closely examine Cur Deus homo and treat Anselm as a significant theological authority. Anselm’s treatise is cited extensively in Alexander’s Glossa and in his disputed questions. Yet Anselm’s Cur Deus homo has an even greater presence in the Summa Halensis (SH) than it does those earlier works. Michael Robson, who has documented the influence of Anselm among early Franciscan theologians, writes, ‘A barometer of the growing influence of Anselm on the nascent Franciscan school is strikingly present in Book 3 of the Summa Fratris Alexandri, whose early questions presuppose a close reading of the Cur Deus homo.’1 Similarly, J. Patout Burns writes that in the SH ‘Anselm comes into his own as the master of teaching on redemption’.2 Anselm did exercise a great amount of influence on how the SH understands Christ’s redemptive work. The SH, for instance, adopts Anselm’s claim that making satisfaction is central to  Michael Robson, ‘Odo Rigaldi and the Assimilation of St. Anselm’s Cur Deus homo in the School of the Cordeliers in Paris,’ in Saint Anselm and his Legacy, ed. Giles E.M. Gasper and Ian Logan, Durham Medieval and Renaissance Mongraphs and Essays, 2 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2012), 165. For more on the place of the Summa Halensis in the reception of Cur Deus homo, see Brian P. McGuire, ‘The History of Saint Anselm’s Theology of the Redemption in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries’ (D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 1970).  J. Patout Burns, ‘The Concept of Satisfaction in Medieval Redemption Theory,’ Theological Studies","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116527058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"John of Damascus in the Summa Halensis","authors":"J. Zachhuber","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-008","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the quotations from John of Damascus’ De fide orthodoxa contained in the Summa Halensis, specifically in its section on the assumption of human nature in the Incarnation. Starting from contextual observations, the paper moves, in a first step, to an analysis of citations from the Damascene in Peter Lombard’s Sentences. The authoritative role of the latter writing meant that its often idiosyncratic use of the Damascene was passed on to later scholastics, such as the authors of the Summa. A detailed consideration of ten quotations from the Damascene in the Summa, which makes up the second part of the paper, reveals a complex pattern of reception. Passages from De fide orthodoxa were often taken out of context, truncated, or both, in order to serve as building blocks in the Summa’s own, dialectical presentation of a theological topic. In conclusion, the paper cautions against the conventional assumption equating the number of references to an authority in the Summa with their conceptual influence. The reader of the Summa Halensis is not only confronted with the extraordinary quantity of its literary achievement. Equally intimidating is the number of references made in this work of the early Franciscan school to a vast number of authorities: pagan, Jewish, Muslim, and Christian authors from antiquity up until their own time are cited, often with precise or seemingly precise references to the passages from which these citations have been taken. Among this huge number of intertextual references, quotations from the 8-century Greek-Arabic theologian John of Damascus make up a not inconsiderable part. According to the comprehensive index of citations which the Quaracchi editors of the Summa have prepared, there is a total of 591 references to the work of the Damascene.1 Almost all of them are taken from one book, his ̓́Εκδοσις ἀκριβὴς τῆς ὀρθοδόξου πίστεως.2 This summary of Greek Patristic theology had been translated into Latin under the title De fide orthodoxa by Burgundio of Pisa in the mid 12 century.3 Its impact on Western scholasticism was nearly  Doctoris irrefragabilis Alexandri de Hales Ordinis minorum Summa theologica: Indices in tom. I-IV (Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae, 1979), 148–50.  John of Damascus, Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos, vol. 2, Expositio Fidei, ed. Bonifatius Kotter (Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 1973).  Saint John Damascene, De Fide Orthodoxa:Versions of Burgundio and Cerbanus, ed. Eligius M. Buytaert (St Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, 1955). In what follows, I use this title to refer to both the Greek and the Latin versions of John’s treatise. OpenAccess. © 2020 Lydia Schumacher, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-008 immediate not least because Peter Lombard made heavy use of this work in his four books of Sentences, a work of unrivalled influence in","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114718124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Summa Halensis: Sources and Context","authors":"L. Schumacher","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-003","url":null,"abstract":"The Franciscan intellectual tradition as it developed before Bonaventure, and above all, Duns Scotus, has not been the subject of much scholarly attention over the years. By most accounts, Bonaventure’s forebears, and even Bonaventure himself, worked primarily to systematize the intellectual tradition of Augustine that had prevailed for most of the earlier Middle Ages.1 In contrast, Scotus is supposed to have broken with past precedent to develop innovative philosophical and theological positions that anticipated the rise of modern thought. Thus, Scotus and his successors have been the focus of many studies, while his predecessors are deemed largely insignificant for the further history of thought.2 This volume and another that accompanies it will make a case for the innovativeness of early Franciscan thought, which the editor has also advanced elsewhere.3 The contributions are based on proceedings from four conferences which were held over the course of 2018 and sponsored by the European Research Council. While these conferences concerned the early Franciscan tradition in general, their more specific focus was the so-called Summa Halensis, a massive text that was collaboratively authored by the founding members of the Franciscan school at Paris between 1236 and 1245, in an attempt to lay down a distinctly Franciscan intellectual tradition for the very first time. Although some final additions to the text were made in 1255–6, the Summa was mostly composed during the second quarter of the thirteenth century and thus within first 50 years of the existence of the University of Paris, which was founded around 1200 and served as the centre for theological study at the time. In countless respects, it laid the foundation for the further development of the Franciscan intellectual tradition The need for a text like the Summa was precipitated in part by the rapid growth of the Franciscan order—from 12 members in 1209 to as many as 20,000 by 1250—the","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129340469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Slippers in Heaven","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134155272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Summa Halensis","authors":"Ayelet Even-Ezra","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130322338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hugh of St Victor’s Influence on the Summa Halensis","authors":"Taylor Coolman","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-014","url":null,"abstract":": The influence of the 12 th century Victorines, especially that of Hugh and Richard of St Victor, on the Summa Halensis , is pervasive, both deep and wide. The Halensist quotes both authors explicitly and frequently. A catalogue of Hugh citations would reveal one kind of perspective on Hugh ’ s influence on various topics, especially on the sacraments in the unedited Book IV of the Summa. Arguably more important, though, is Hugh ’ s influence on the entire orientation and method of the early Franciscan Summa. Three aspects of this form of influence are noteworthy. First, the Halensist adopts and adapts Hugh ’ s signature distinction between the two fundamental ‘ works of God ’ , namely, creating and restoring, as a framework for organizing the content of the entire Summa. Second, the Halensist identifies the overarch-ing subject matter of theology as the Hugonian ‘ works of restoration ’ in salvation history, centered on the Incarnation. Third, the Halensist is inspired by Hugh to con-ceive of theology as a practical discipline, aimed ultimately at perfecting its praction-er affectively by orienting her in love toward divine goodness. In this, theology is a distinct form of Christian wisdom. oft-cited the Victorine Reduction the Arts Theology. ¹ There, surveying the luminaries of recent remote Christian the Seraphic Doctor special tribute Hugh. Franciscan three ’ .²","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126501661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Index","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128456672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Summa Halensis","authors":"L. Schumacher","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132167080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}