Antisemitism Studies最新文献_第2页

Excluding the Jew Within Us - Jean-Luc Nancy 排除我们内心的犹太人-让-卢克·南希

Antisemitism Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.2979/antistud.6.2.14

J. Cahan

引用次数: 0

Understanding the Difference Between Antisemitism and Anti-Judaism 理解反犹主义和反犹太教的区别

Antisemitism Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.2979/antistud.6.2.09

Marianne Moyaert

引用次数: 0

A Catholic Response to John Pawlikowski on the Persistence of Antisemitism 天主教对约翰·帕利科夫斯基关于反犹主义持续存在的回应

Antisemitism Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.2979/antistud.6.2.05

J. Borelli

引用次数: 0

The Nun in the Synagogue: Judeocentric Catholicism in Israel - Emma O’Donnell Polyakov 《犹太教堂里的修女:以色列以犹太教为中心的天主教》——艾玛·奥唐奈·波里亚科夫

Antisemitism Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.2979/antistud.6.2.11

Elena G. Procario-Foley

引用次数: 0

Are More Highly Educated Individuals More Antisemitic? Findings Based on a New Approach to Measuring Antisemitism Using Double Standards 教育程度越高的人越反犹太吗?基于双重标准衡量反犹主义新方法的调查结果

Antisemitism Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.2979/antistud.6.1.04

Albert Cheng, Jay P. Greene, Ian Kingsbury

引用次数: 0

Silent or Outspoken? Re-Examining French Jewish Responses to the Dreyfus Affair 沉默还是直言?重新审视法国犹太人对德雷福斯事件的反应

Antisemitism Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.2979/antistud.6.1.02

Zvi Jonathan Kaplan, Lauren Gottlieb Lockshin

{"title":"Silent or Outspoken? Re-Examining French Jewish Responses to the Dreyfus Affair","authors":"Zvi Jonathan Kaplan, Lauren Gottlieb Lockshin","doi":"10.2979/antistud.6.1.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/antistud.6.1.02","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Historians of the Dreyfus Affair have long argued over the response of French Jews to the wrongful arrest of their coreligionist, French army captain Alfred Dreyfus, on charges of treason in 1894. While early historiographies focused on Jewish silence and passivity, more recent works have claimed to reveal a Jewish outspokenness. This article attempts to resolve this dissonance by showing that the Jewish response to the Dreyfus Affair is best understood in two phases: an early phase from 1894–1897 and a late phase from 1898–1906. During the early phase, silence prevailed among French Jews who feared confronting a powerful antisemitism driven largely by the Catholic Church. Bernard Lazare, one of the only French Jewish intellectuals to rise in Dreyfus's defense, revealed the role of antisemitism in the Affair during this period by pointing to its religious underpinnings. During the late phase of the Affair beginning in 1898, as more Frenchmen joined the Dreyfusard cause, French Jews were more comfortable being outspoken in defense of Dreyfus and in opposition to antisemitism. This is clearly documented in articles published in the two largest Jewish periodicals in France, the religiously liberal Les Archives Israélites de France and the religiously conservative L'Univers Israélite. Even though anti-clericalism was not the fundamental rationale for Jewish support for Dreyfus, Jews engaged with the clerical/anti-clerical debate at this time, pushing the community in a more anti-clerical direction and strengthening its faith in republican ideals.","PeriodicalId":148002,"journal":{"name":"Antisemitism Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129716915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Antisemitism in History and Politics 历史与政治中的反犹主义

Antisemitism Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.2979/antistud.6.1.05

O. Bartov

引用次数: 0

Michael Adams and Christopher Mayhew Against Maariv: The Trial that Defined the New Antisemitism 迈克尔·亚当斯和克里斯托弗·梅休《反对马里夫:定义新反犹主义的审判

Antisemitism Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.2979/antistud.6.1.03

Joshua Blass

{"title":"Michael Adams and Christopher Mayhew Against Maariv: The Trial that Defined the New Antisemitism","authors":"Joshua Blass","doi":"10.2979/antistud.6.1.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/antistud.6.1.03","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines a mostly forgotten libel suit that examined the boundaries of the term antisemitism. Public rhetorical attacks against the Jewish people as a whole were less frequent in the West after World War II, but Israel and Zionism became the target of fierce propaganda beginning in the 1970s. In 1975, British MP Christopher Mayhew and former Guardian reporter Michael Adams co-authored a book criticizing Western media coverage of the Arab-Israeli conflict titled Publish It Not: The Middle East Cover-Up. A review of the book, published in the Israeli newspaper Maariv the following year, called them out as antisemites. Mayhew and Adams sued the paper and its book reviewer for libel. In the trial, held in Jerusalem, both sides argued over whether their fierce anti-Zionism and harsh criticism of Israel was politically legitimate or antisemitic. In August 1979, District Court Judge Jacob Bazak's verdict absolved Maariv of the charge of libel, characterizing the book review as \"justified and accurate,\" and drew a fine line between legitimate criticism of Israel and antisemitism. This dispute between opposing high-profile scholars, former generals, and politicians contributed to a wider discussion of antisemitism and has relevance for these same debates today.","PeriodicalId":148002,"journal":{"name":"Antisemitism Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130507613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

When Does It Make Sense to Call Hostility Towards Jews Antisemitism and When Does It Not? A Historical Perspective on Contemporary Debates 什么时候把对犹太人的敌意称为反犹太主义是有意义的，什么时候不是?当代辩论的历史视角

Antisemitism Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.2979/antistud.6.1.06

S. Beller

引用次数: 0

Robert Fine, 1945–2018: Antisemitism on the Left 罗伯特·法恩，1945-2018:左翼的反犹主义

Antisemitism Studies Pub Date : 2021-11-05 DOI: 10.2979/antistud.5.2.04

P. Spencer

引用次数: 0