Are More Highly Educated Individuals More Antisemitic? Findings Based on a New Approach to Measuring Antisemitism Using Double Standards

Albert Cheng, Jay P. Greene, Ian Kingsbury
{"title":"Are More Highly Educated Individuals More Antisemitic? Findings Based on a New Approach to Measuring Antisemitism Using Double Standards","authors":"Albert Cheng, Jay P. Greene, Ian Kingsbury","doi":"10.2979/antistud.6.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Empirical research on antisemitism typically measures antisemitism based on self-reported surveys. This approach, however, is limited by the possibility of social desirability bias. That is, respondents who are more sophisticated may be more likely to detect the purpose of the measure and adjust their answers, giving socially desirable responses that fail to reveal their antisemitism. To address this measurement issue, we developed a new way to measure antisemitism based on identifying instances in which a double standard has been applied and measuring its magnitude. We then use the new approach to examine antisemitic attitudes in a nationally representative survey of over 1,800 American adults. Our study found evidence contrary to the conventional wisdom that antisemitism is less prevalent among highly educated individuals. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of our new measurement approach and our results, which indicate higher levels of antisemitic attitudes among individuals with more education.","PeriodicalId":148002,"journal":{"name":"Antisemitism Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antisemitism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/antistud.6.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Empirical research on antisemitism typically measures antisemitism based on self-reported surveys. This approach, however, is limited by the possibility of social desirability bias. That is, respondents who are more sophisticated may be more likely to detect the purpose of the measure and adjust their answers, giving socially desirable responses that fail to reveal their antisemitism. To address this measurement issue, we developed a new way to measure antisemitism based on identifying instances in which a double standard has been applied and measuring its magnitude. We then use the new approach to examine antisemitic attitudes in a nationally representative survey of over 1,800 American adults. Our study found evidence contrary to the conventional wisdom that antisemitism is less prevalent among highly educated individuals. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of our new measurement approach and our results, which indicate higher levels of antisemitic attitudes among individuals with more education.
教育程度越高的人越反犹太吗?基于双重标准衡量反犹主义新方法的调查结果
摘要:反犹主义的实证研究通常基于自我报告调查来衡量反犹主义。然而,这种方法受到社会期望偏差可能性的限制。也就是说,更老练的受访者可能更有可能察觉到测量的目的,并调整他们的答案,给出社会期望的回答,但不会暴露他们的反犹主义。为了解决这个衡量问题,我们开发了一种新的方法来衡量反犹主义,该方法基于识别双重标准被应用的实例并衡量其程度。然后,我们用新方法在一项对1800多名美国成年人进行的全国代表性调查中检验了反犹态度。我们的研究发现了与传统观点相反的证据,即反犹主义在受过高等教育的人群中不那么普遍。文章最后讨论了我们的新测量方法和结果的含义,这些结果表明,受教育程度较高的个人的反犹态度水平更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信