Journal of Public Deliberation最新文献_第7页

Focus Group Discussions as Sites for Public Deliberation and Sensemaking Following Shared Political Documentary Viewing 焦点小组讨论是分享政治纪录片观看后公众讨论和表达意义的场所

Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2017-11-06 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.282

M. Pitts, K. Kenski, Stephanie A. Smith, Corey A. Pavlich

{"title":"Focus Group Discussions as Sites for Public Deliberation and Sensemaking Following Shared Political Documentary Viewing","authors":"M. Pitts, K. Kenski, Stephanie A. Smith, Corey A. Pavlich","doi":"10.16997/JDD.282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.282","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the potential that shared political documentary viewing coupled with public deliberation via focus group discussion has for political sensemaking and civic engagement. Specifically, we examine college students’ perceptions of sensemaking, future civic engagement, and benefits of participating in group discussion following the shared viewing of D’Souza’s political documentary 2016: Obama’s America. Focus group participants reported that engaging in discussion served to clarify, affirm, and reinforce some initial impressions while opening their eyes to new insights and information. Focus group participation triggered a desire to seek out and hear additional diverse points of view and offered participants the opportunity to diffuse negative emotions and reflect upon media content. Participants reported that they enjoyed participating in this form of guided discussion, reported increased confidence in their abilities to engage in public political deliberation, and reported feeling a call to future civic action. Our findings show that political documentary viewing coupled with focus group discussions can be a productive site for public deliberation that can lead to enhanced sensemaking and positive future civic behaviors including intentions to extend discussions to personal networks and to research issues raised in the discussion or documentary. We address implications for deliberative pedagogy and focus groups as public deliberation.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114943694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Explaining Political Efficacy in Deliberative Procedures - A Novel Methodological Approach 解释协商程序中的政治效能——一种新的方法论方法

Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2017-11-06 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.280

Brigitte Geißel, P. Hess

引用次数: 15

Organising stakeholder workshops in research and innovation – between theory and practice 在理论和实践之间组织研究和创新的利益相关者研讨会

Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2017-11-06 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.285

M. Nielsen, Nina Bryndum, B. Bedsted

引用次数: 5

Beyond Aggregation: “The Wisdom of Crowds” Meets Dialogue in the Case Study of Shaping America’s Youth 超越聚合:“群体的智慧”在塑造美国青年的案例研究中遇到对话

Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2017-11-06 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.279

R. Heath, Niñon Lewis, Brit S. Schneider, Elisa Majors

引用次数: 2

Review of Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration by Teresa M. Bejan (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017) 《纯粹的文明:分歧与容忍的极限》，特蕾莎·m·贝扬著(剑桥:哈佛大学出版社，2017)

Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2017-11-06 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.289

D. Schenck-Hamlin

引用次数: 0

Reading Between the Lines of Participation: Tenant Participation and Participatory Budgeting in Toronto Community Housing 参与的字里行间:多伦多社区住房的租户参与和参与式预算

Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2017-11-06 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.287

Behrang Foroughi

{"title":"Reading Between the Lines of Participation: Tenant Participation and Participatory Budgeting in Toronto Community Housing","authors":"Behrang Foroughi","doi":"10.16997/JDD.287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.287","url":null,"abstract":"Participatory Budgeting (PB) is currently practiced in more than a dozen of American cities. It is indicated by the White House as best practice in civic engagement and by scholars as a new wave of democratic innovation. With the enthusiastic spread of PB in the US, it is imperative to continuously integrate reflective learning to sustain and enhance its impact. In this paper, I share learning drawn form the practice of PB at the Toronto Community Housing (TCH), highlighting a host of communicative and procedural challenges, hindering the growth of collaborative partnerships among the management, staff and the tenants. I demonstrate that the stakeholders have developed differing perspectives and multiple experiences with regard to tenant participation, and in consequence, participation has been molded into a rather confusing format. The weakest link, I argue, has been a lack of deliberation on a participatory vision: what it is that PB and tenant participation must achieve. Author Biography Behrang Foroughi is an Assistant Professor at the Arizona State University where he teaches in the areas of Community Leadership, Social Innovation, and International Development. His community development research and practice involves working with nomadic and indigenous communities, nonprofit leaders and social activists in the Middle East and North America.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132742645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Authority and Deliberative Moments: Assessing Equality and Inequality in Deeply Divided Groups 权威与审议时刻:评估深度分裂群体中的平等与不平等

Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2017-11-06 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.283

R. Maia, D. Cal, Janine Bargas, V. V. Oliveira, Patrícia G. C. Rossini, Rafael Cardoso Sampaio

{"title":"Authority and Deliberative Moments: Assessing Equality and Inequality in Deeply Divided Groups","authors":"R. Maia, D. Cal, Janine Bargas, V. V. Oliveira, Patrícia G. C. Rossini, Rafael Cardoso Sampaio","doi":"10.16997/JDD.283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.283","url":null,"abstract":"The notion of equality is central to public deliberation, but few researches have examined how participants construct interactions in face-to-face group discussion involving unequal conditions of authority. This study analyses discussion between slum residents and police officers in Brazil, focusing on both reciprocal and hierarchical relationships in the flow of deliberation. It contributes to explain that the expression of authority is far from straightforward. Looking at a range of authority sources (expertise, functional position, tradition, life experience) that serve to situate and re-situate participants in relation to each other in discussion dynamics helps clarifying what goes on in deliberative moments. Findings reveal that personal experiences prevail in deliberative moments whereas functional credentials predominate in non-deliberative ones. Yet, the case demonstrates that functional authority is not necessarily dominative but can be combined with certain behaviors (such as empathetic imagination, search for commonalities and self-criticism) that lead to reciprocal interactions. This study provides important insights for organizing deliberation more effectively in contexts of fear, mistrust and resentment.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133901305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

The Influence of Communication- and Organization-Related Factors on Interest in Participation in Campus Dialogic Deliberation 沟通与组织相关因素对参与校园对话讨论兴趣的影响

Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2017-11-06 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.281

Gregory D. Paul

引用次数: 0

“Nothing about politics”: The political scope in rural participatory governance, a case-study in the Basque Country, Spain “与政治无关”:农村参与式治理的政治范围，以西班牙巴斯克地区为例

Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2017-11-06 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.284

Patricia García-Espín

引用次数: 1

Review of Listening for Democracy – Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation by Andrew Dobson (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014) 安德鲁·多布森《倾听民主——承认、代表、和解》书评(纽约:牛津大学出版社，2014年)

Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2017-11-06 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.290

M. Oelofsen

引用次数: 2