JNCI Cancer Spectrum最新文献

{"title":"Language, 6-mercaptopurine adherence, and relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.","authors":"Joanna Robles, Yanjun Chen, Lindsey Hageman, Paula Aristizabal, Wendy Landier, Smita Bhatia, Aman Wadhwa","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae076","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hispanic children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have lower 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) adherence and greater hazard of relapse compared with non-Hispanic White children. We examined the association between Spanish language and 6MP adherence, and hazard of relapse. 6MP adherence was measured electronically over a 6-month period. Participants were grouped by the language of demographic questionnaire completion: Non-Hispanic White-English Speaking (ES, n = 159), Hispanic-Spanish Speaking (Hispanic-SS, n = 59), and Hispanic-ES (n = 109). Hispanic-ES had significantly lower fitted median 6MP adherence compared with non-Hispanic White-ES participants (88.3%, 95% CI = 84.7% to 91.2% vs 95.0%, 95% CI = 93.6% to 96.2%, P < .001). There was no difference in fitted median 6MP adherence between Hispanic-ES and Hispanic-SS participants (88.3%, 95% CI = 84.1% to 91.5% vs 88.3%, 95% CI = 84.7% to 91.2%, P = .9) or adjusted hazard of relapse for Hispanic-SS participants (HR = 0.9, 95%CI = 0.3 to 2.4, P = .8). Spanish language use among Hispanic patients with ALL is not associated with lower 6MP adherence or greater relapse risk. Factors related to Hispanic ethnicity, apart from language, appear to influence adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410191/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142125729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Impact of the serrated pathway on the simulated comparative effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening tests.","authors":"Reinier G S Meester, Uri Ladabaum","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae077","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancers (CRCs) arise from adenomas, which can produce fecal occult blood and can be detected endoscopically, or sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), which rarely bleed and may be more challenging to detect. Models informing CRC screening policy should reflect both pathways, accounting for uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Novel decision-analytic model of the adenoma and serrated pathways for CRC (ANSER) to compare current and emerging screening strategies, accounting for differential test sensitivities for adenomas and SSLs, and uncertainty. Strategies included colonoscopy every 10 years, stool-DNA/FIT (sDNA-FIT) every 1-3 years, or fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) every year from age 45 to 75 years. Outcomes included CRC cases and deaths, cost-effectiveness (cost/quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained), and burden-benefit (colonoscopies/life-year gained), with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ANSER predicted 62.5 (95% UI = 58.8-66.3) lifetime CRC cases and 24.1 (95% UI = 22.5-25.7) CRC deaths/1000 45-year-olds without screening, and 78%-87% CRC mortality reductions with screening. The tests' outcome distributions overlapped for QALYs gained but separated for required colonoscopies and costs. All strategies cost less than $100 000/QALY gained vs no screening. Colonoscopy was the most effective and cost-effective, costing $9300/life-year gained (95% UI = $500-$21 900) vs FIT. sDNA-FIT cost more than $500 000/QALY gained vs FIT. As more CRCs arose from SSLs, colonoscopy remained preferred based on clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness, but cost-effectiveness improved for a next-generation sDNA-FIT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the serrated pathway is considered, modeling suggests that colonoscopy is cost-effective vs FIT. In contrast, modeling suggests that sDNA-FIT is not cost-effective vs FIT despite its greater sensitivity for SSLs, even if a substantial minority of CRCs arise from SSLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470154/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Germline testing for veterans with advanced prostate cancer: concerns about service-connected benefits.","authors":"Daniel H Kwon, Maren T Scheuner, Marissa McPhaul, Eliza Hearst, Saffanat Sumra, Carling Ursem, Evan Walker, Sunny Wang, Franklin W Huang, Rahul R Aggarwal, Jeff Belkora","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae079","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To better understand veterans' decisions about germline testing, we conducted a single-site, qualitative study of 32 veterans with advanced prostate cancer. Seven days after oncologist-patient discussions about germline testing, we conducted semistructured interviews with patients to explore their decision-making process using an interview guide. Four of 14 veterans with service-connected disability benefits for prostate cancer declined germline testing for fear of losing benefits because their livelihood depended on these benefits. All 18 veterans without service-connected benefits agreed to testing. Veterans declining germline testing based on this concern can lead to suboptimal cancer care because targeted treatments that could improve their outcomes may go unrecognized. Our findings contributed to new language in the Veterans Benefits Administration Compensation and Pension Manual clarifying that genetic testing showing hereditary predisposition is insufficient to deny service-connected benefits for conditions presumed to be caused by military exposures. Clinicians should communicate this protection when counseling veterans about genetic testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487480/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142287462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Racial and ethnic differences in second primary lung cancer risk among lung cancer survivors.","authors":"Eunji Choi, Yue Hua, Chloe C Su, Julie T Wu, Joel W Neal, Ann N Leung, Leah M Backhus, Christopher Haiman, Loïc Le Marchand, Su-Ying Liang, Heather A Wakelee, Iona Cheng, Summer S Han","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae072","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent therapeutic advances have improved survival among lung cancer (LC) patients, who are now at high risk of second primary lung cancer (SPLC). Hispanics comprise the largest minority in the United States, who have shown a lower LC incidence and mortality than other races, and yet their SPLC risk is poorly understood. We quantified the SPLC incidence patterns among Hispanics vs other races.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Multiethnic Cohort, a population-based cohort of 5 races (African American, Japanese American, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and White), recruited between 1993 and 1996 and followed through 2017. We identified patients diagnosed with initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) and SPLC via linkage to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. We estimated the 10-year cumulative incidence of IPLC (in the entire cohort) and SPLC (among IPLC patients). A standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated as the ratio of SPLC-to-IPLC incidence by race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 202 692 participants, 6788 (3.3%) developed IPLC over 3 871  417 person-years. The 10-year cumulative IPLC incidence was lower among Hispanics (0.80%, 0.72 to 0.88) vs Whites (1.67%, 1.56 to 1.78) or Blacks (2.44%, 2.28 to 2.60). However, the 10-year SPLC incidence following IPLC was higher among Hispanics (3.11%, 1.62 to 4.61) vs Whites (2.80%, 1.94 to 3.66) or Blacks (2.29%, 1.48 to 3.10), resulting in a significantly higher SIR for Hispanics (SIR = 8.27, 5.05 to 12.78) vs Whites (SIR = 5.60, 4.11 to 7.45) or Blacks (SIR = 3.48, 2.42 to 4.84; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hispanics have a higher SPLC incidence following IPLC than other races, which may be potentially due to better survival after IPLC and extended duration for SPLC development. Continuing surveillance is warranted to reduce racial disparities among LC survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410193/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cancer information and population health resource: a resource for catchment area data and cancer outcomes research.","authors":"Christopher D Baggett, Bradford E Jackson, Laura Green, Tzy-Mey Kuo, KyungSu Kim, Xi Zhou, Katherine E Reeder-Hayes, Jennifer L Lund, Stephanie B Wheeler, Andrew F Olshan","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae069","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center has developed a novel data resource, the Cancer Information and Population Health Resource (CIPHR), for conducting catchment area evaluation and cancer population health research that links the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry (NCCCR) to medical and pharmacy claims data from Medicare, Medicaid, and private plans operating within North Carolina. This study's aim was to describe the CIPHR data and provide examples of potential cohorts available in those data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present the underlying populations included in the NCCCR and claims data before linkage and demonstrate estimated sample sizes when these data are linked and commonly used insurance enrollment criteria are applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for the years 2003-2020 are present in CIPHR and include 947 977 cancer cases from the NCCCR and 21.6 million enrollees in public and private health insurance (cancer and noncancer cases). When limited to first or only cancers (n = 672 377), 86% could be linked to insurance enrollment for at least 1 month during 2003-2020 (n = 582 638), with 62% of individuals linking to enrollment during the month of cancer diagnosis. Among all registry cancer cases, 47% (n = 317 898) had continuous insurance enrollment for at least 12 months before and after cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CIPHR illustrates the utility of establishing and maintaining a statewide, comprehensive cancer population health database. This resource serves to characterize the cancer center catchment area and aids in tracking cancer outcomes and trends in care delivery as well as identifying disparities that require intervention and policy focus.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141982320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Settling the score: what composite measures of social determinants tell us about hypertension risk.","authors":"William Letsou","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae065","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae065","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368122/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142119821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"University of North Carolina adolescent and young adult cancer program: reach and characteristics of care.","authors":"Jacob Stein, Alexis Wardell, Dawn M Ritzwoller, Catherine Swift, Melissa Matson, Hannah C Winslow, Hrishika Muthukrishnan, Austin R Waters, Emily R Haines, Lauren Lux, Andrew B Smitherman","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae092","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer care organizations often struggle to adequately address the unique needs of adolescent and young adult cancer patients, resulting in poorer outcomes compared with other age groups. Creation of adolescent and young adult cancer programs serves to bridge this gap and improve quality of care for this population. We aimed to describe the evolution and impact of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Program. To do so, we conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing electronic health record data matched with North Carolina Cancer Registry data from 2014 to 2022. Between 2014 and 2022, a total of 4016 adolescents and young adults (aged 13-39 years) received cancer care at the University of North Carolina Medical Center, with 670 having contact with the Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Program. Program-contacted patients were younger, more likely to be non-Hispanic Black race, and more likely to have metastatic disease or hematologic malignancies. We saw a steady increase in patient volume over the study period, corresponding with program growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524889/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142465723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Measuring the quality of care in metastatic colorectal cancer: a scoping review of quality indicators.","authors":"Catherine Dunn, Michael T Halpern, Daniel Sapkaroski, Peter Gibbs","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae073","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality indicators are essential for measuring and benchmarking the quality of cancer care. Although there are well-established metrics for early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC), few exist for advanced CRC. This scoping review aimed to collate and review all quality indicators for metastatic CRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dedicated search was performed of Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and relevant gray literature to identify quality indicators for metastatic CRC, evaluating the diagnostic workup, systemic anticancer treatments, surgical approaches, radiation approaches, supportive care, and palliative or terminal care provided to patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 11 articles, of which 5 were systematized reviews and 6 concerned the development, validation, or operationalization of quality indicators. Thirty-five distinct quality indicators for metastatic CRC were extracted across 6 domains of care: 1) diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning; 2) systemic anticancer treatment; 3) radiation oncology; 4) surgical approaches; 5) supportive care; and 6) palliative and end-of-life care, with a general quality indicator of overall survival. Of the 35 quality indicators extracted, 8 (23%) were unique to metastatic CRC and 27 (77%) were generic quality indicators across different tumor types but applicable to metastatic CRC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are few quality indicators specifically relevant to metastatic CRC. Those that do exist are generally generic process measures used across tumor types and do not measure the nuance or complexity of current multidisciplinary treatment of patients with metastatic CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487155/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reviewers.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae055","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11416867/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142465725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cost trends of metastatic renal cell carcinoma therapy: the impact of oral anticancer agents and immunotherapy.","authors":"Rebecca Forman, Jessica B Long, Sarah J Westvold, Khushi Agnish, Hannah D Mcmanus, Michael S Leapman, Michael E Hurwitz, Lisa P Spees, Stephanie B Wheeler, Cary P Gross, Michaela A Dinan","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae067","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunotherapy (IO) and oral anticancer agents (OAA) have improved outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but there is a need to understand real-world costs from the perspective of payers and patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used retrospective fee-for-service Medicare 100% claims data to study patients diagnosed with mRCC in 2015-2019. We identified initial treatment type and costs (the year after diagnosis) and analyzed differences in monthly and 12-month costs over time and between OAA, IO, and combination groups and the association between Out-Of-Pocket (OOP) costs and adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 15 407 patients with mRCC (61% male; 85% non-Hispanic White). A total of 6196 received OAA, IO, or combination OAA/IO as initial treatment. OAA use decreased (from 31% to 11%) with a simultaneous rise in patients receiving IO (3% to 26%) or combination IO/OAA therapy (1% to 11%). Medicare payments for all patients with mRCC increased by 41%, from $60 320 (95% confidence interval = 58 260 to 62 380) in 2015 to $85 130 (95% confidence interval = 82 630 to 87 630) in 2019. Payments increased in patients who received OAA, IO, or combination OAA/IO but were stable in those with other/no treatment. Initial higher OOP responsibility ($200-$1000) was associated with 13% decrease in percent days covered in patients receiving OAA in the first 90 days of treatment, compared with those whose OOP responsibility was less than $200.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From 2015 to 2019, costs for Medicare patients with mRCC rose substantially due to more patients receiving IO or IO/OAA combined therapy and increases in costs among those receiving those therapies. Increased OOP costs was associated with decreased adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376369/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141916695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}