Angelina Tjokrowidjaja, Peey-Sei Kok, Yoland C Antill, Clare L Scott, Linda R Mileshkin, Michael L Friedlander, Chee K Lee
{"title":"Impact of chemotherapy on patients with mismatch repair deficient advanced endometrial carcinomas-a meta-analysis.","authors":"Angelina Tjokrowidjaja, Peey-Sei Kok, Yoland C Antill, Clare L Scott, Linda R Mileshkin, Michael L Friedlander, Chee K Lee","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae101","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemo-immunotherapy is standard of care for women with recurrent or advanced mismatch repair deficient endometrial carcinoma. However, it is uncertain whether patients with mismatch repair deficient advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma derive less benefit from chemotherapy than those with mismatch repair proficient endometrial carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma to determine the difference in the benefit of chemotherapy in mismatch repair deficient vs mismatch repair proficient endometrial carcinoma. Data on chemotherapy outcomes including objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were retrieved. We pooled these data using the inverse variance method and examined subgroup difference by mismatch repair status. We also compared differences in PFS and overall survival outcomes by creating individual patient data from the Kaplan-Meier curves of trial publications for sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 RCTs with 1137 participants (mismatch repair deficient, 26%; mismatch repair proficient, 74%) were included. All participants were treated with carboplatin-based chemotherapy. There was no difference between the mismatch repair deficient and mismatch repair proficient subgroups for objective response rate (66.5% vs 64.0%; P = .20 for subgroup difference), PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77 to 1.12; P = .44; median PFS = 7.6 vs 9.5 months) or overall survival (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.44; P = .88; median overall survival = not reached vs 28.6 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Objective response rate, PFS, and overall survival were similar among those with mismatch repair deficient vs mismatch repair proficient endometrial cancer treated with front-line, platinum-doublet chemotherapy in RCTs. These findings reinforce the importance of combining chemotherapy together with immune checkpoint inhibitors until the results of trials comparing immune checkpoint therapy alone with combination therapy are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552623/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142465721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Samuel L Washington Iii, Mary Fakunle, Lufan Wang, Avery E Braun, Michael Leapman, Janet E Cowan, Matthew R Cooperberg
{"title":"County-level racial disparities in prostate cancer-specific mortality from 2005 to 2020.","authors":"Samuel L Washington Iii, Mary Fakunle, Lufan Wang, Avery E Braun, Michael Leapman, Janet E Cowan, Matthew R Cooperberg","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae109","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local conditions where people live continue to influence prostate cancer outcomes. By examining local characteristics associated with trends in Black-White differences in prostate cancer-specific mortality over time, we aim to identify factors driving county-level prostate cancer-specific mortality disparities over a 15-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked county-level data (Area Health Resource File) with clinicodemographic data of men with prostate cancer (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry) from 2005 to 2020. Generalized linear mixed models evaluated associations between race and county-level age-standardized prostate cancer-specific mortality, adjusting for age; year of death; rurality; county-level education; income; uninsured rates; and densities of urologists, radiologists, primary care practitioners, and hospital beds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 1085 counties, 185 390 patients were identified of which 15.8% were non-Hispanic Black. Racial disparities in prostate cancer-specific mortality narrowed from 2005 to 2020 (25.4 per 100 000 to 19.2 per 100 000 overall, 57.9 per 100 000 to 38 per 100 000 for non-Hispanic Black patients, and 23.4 per 100 000 to 18.3 per 100 000 for non-Hispanic White patients). For non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients, county prostate cancer-specific mortality changes varied greatly (-65% to +77% and -61% to +112%, respectively). From 2016 to 2020, non-Hispanic Black patients harbored greater prostate cancer-specific mortality risk (relative risk = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01 to 2.18); higher radiation oncologist density was associated with lower mortality risk (relative risk = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89 to 0.98), while other practitioner densities were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although overall rates improved, specific counties experienced worsening race-based disparities over time. Identifying locations of highest (and lowest) mortality disparities remains critical to development of location-specific solutions to racial disparities in prostate cancer outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631307/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142568662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jean A McDougall, Shoshana Adler Jaffe, Kendal Jacobson, Tori L Shaver, Jennifer L F Wilson, Katrina Baca, Tawny Boyce, Bernard Tawfik, Janet Page-Reeves
{"title":"Randomized pilot trial of an unconditional cash transfer intervention to address food insecurity in oncology.","authors":"Jean A McDougall, Shoshana Adler Jaffe, Kendal Jacobson, Tori L Shaver, Jennifer L F Wilson, Katrina Baca, Tawny Boyce, Bernard Tawfik, Janet Page-Reeves","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae107","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Screening for food insecurity and other social determinants of health is being integrated into oncology practice. We performed a pilot randomized trial to investigate whether an unconditional cash transfer (UCT) could be used to address food insecurity among female breast and gynecological cancer survivors. Food-insecure cancer survivors completed a baseline survey and were randomly assigned to receive $100/month for 3 months (UCT) or usual care (UC). Participants (n = 14) completed a follow-up survey after 3 months, and we compared changes in health-related quality of life, indicators of food insecurity, diet quality, and whether a participant had to forgo, delay, or make changes to medical care because of cost. The UCT was associated with higher physical health scores, fewer indicators of food insecurity, better diet quality, and a lower likelihood of forgoing medical care than those who received UC. Our results suggest that UCTs can improve outcomes for food-insecure cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574865/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142500626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Drew Moghanaki, Michelle Ann Eala, Jill Feldman, Terri Ann DiJulio, Peter Gorayski
{"title":"Lung cancer-a one-way ticket.","authors":"Drew Moghanaki, Michelle Ann Eala, Jill Feldman, Terri Ann DiJulio, Peter Gorayski","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae098","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae098","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540168/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142589633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alyshia Hamm, Evgenia Karayeva, Manoela Lima Oliveira, Nabil Kahouadji, Paul Grippo, Patricia G Wolf, Ece Mutlu, Lisa Tussing-Humphreys, Sage J Kim
{"title":"Neighborhood homicide rate and odds of colorectal adenoma among adult patients seeking colonoscopy.","authors":"Alyshia Hamm, Evgenia Karayeva, Manoela Lima Oliveira, Nabil Kahouadji, Paul Grippo, Patricia G Wolf, Ece Mutlu, Lisa Tussing-Humphreys, Sage J Kim","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae110","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic exposure to ambient stressors, including neighborhood crime, may have a detrimental impact on the body's stress response system with implications for colorectal carcinogenesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined associations between the mean neighborhood homicide rates from 2000 and 2018 and diagnosis of colorectal adenoma among patients at the University of Illinois Health and Hospital System in Chicago, Illinois, between 2015 and 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5225 patients who underwent colonoscopy and were included in the analytic dataset, 60% had colorectal adenoma. Older age, male sex, and higher body mass index (BMI) were associated with greater odds of colorectal adenoma. The neighborhood homicide rate was associated with identifying as Black and Hispanic and higher BMI. A mediation analysis showed that the neighborhood homicide rate effects on colorectal adenoma were mediated through BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study concluded that older age, male sex, and higher BMI increases the odds of colorectal adenoma, with neighborhood homicide rate indirectly influencing this risk through its association with BMI, particularly among Black and Hispanic individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11643352/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jaesung Choi, Madeline R Horan, Tara M Brinkman, D Kumar Srivastava, Kirsten K Ness, Gregory T Armstrong, Melissa M Hudson, I-Chan Huang
{"title":"Neighborhood vulnerability and associations with poor health-related quality of life among adult survivors of childhood cancer.","authors":"Jaesung Choi, Madeline R Horan, Tara M Brinkman, D Kumar Srivastava, Kirsten K Ness, Gregory T Armstrong, Melissa M Hudson, I-Chan Huang","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae088","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have investigated the relationship between neighborhood vulnerability and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the childhood cancer population. This study evaluated the impact of neighborhood vulnerability on HRQOL among adult survivors of childhood cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 4393 adult survivors of childhood cancer from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. At the baseline (2007-2020), HRQOL was assessed using the SF36v2's physical and mental components summaries (PCS and MCS). Neighborhood vulnerability was assessed using the overall, domain, and indicator-specific scores of the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and Minority Health SVI (MHSVI). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations of neighborhood vulnerability (quartiles: Q1-Q4) with impaired HRQOL (1SD below the norm), adjusting for diagnosis, demographics, personal socioeconomic status (SES), lifestyle, and chronic health condition burden. Interactions of SVI and MHSVI with personal SES on impaired HRQOL were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among survivors, 51.9% were male, averaging 30.3 years of age at evaluation and 21.5 years since diagnosis. Comparing neighborhoods with higher vs lower vulnerability (Q4 vs Q1), overall (odds ratio [OR] = 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 2.16) and domain-specific vulnerability (socioeconomic: OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.15; household composition: OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.16 to 2.06; housing and transportation: OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.76; medical vulnerability: OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.22 to 2.09) were significantly associated with impaired PCS, but not MCS. Residing in neighborhoods lacking urgent care clinics was significantly associated with impaired PCS (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.78). Having lower vs higher personal education and living in higher vulnerability neighborhoods were associated with more impaired PCS (Pinteraction = .021).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Specific aspects of neighborhood vulnerability increase the risk for impaired physical HRQOL. Addressing these neighborhood factors is essential to enhance the HRQOL of survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549958/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142287466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Low CD86 expression is a predictive biomarker for clinical response to the therapeutic human papillomavirus vaccine IGMKK16E7: results of a post hoc analysis.","authors":"Hanano Ando, Yuki Katoh, Osamu Kobayashi, Yuji Ikeda, Hideaki Yahata, Takashi Iwata, Toyomi Satoh, Azusa Akiyama, Daichi Maeda, Yumiko Hori-Hirose, Yukari Uemura, Kaori Nakayama-Hosoya, Kanoko Katoh, Takahiro Nakajima, Ayumi Taguchi, Atsushi Komatsu, Saki Kamata, Naoko Tomita, Kiyoko Kato, Daisuke Aoki, Shizunobu Igimi, Ai Kawana-Tachikawa, Danny J Schust, Kei Kawana","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae091","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although therapeutic human papillomavirus vaccines could offer a noninvasive treatment for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, none has been clinically implemented. Oral administration of the therapeutic human papillomavirus vaccine IGMKK16E7 results in the histological regression of human papillomavirus 16-positive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 to normal (complete response). We investigated biomarkers that could predict complete response after oral administration of IGMKK16E7.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two patients administered high-dose oral IGMKK16E7 in a phase I/II trial were included. Cervix-exfoliated cells were collected before vaccine administration. Gene expression of CD4, CD8, FOXP3, programmed cell death 1 protein, CTLA4, CD103, CD28, CD80, CD86, and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 in the cells was measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to explore potential biomarkers. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was used to correlate gene expression profiles with clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The only predictive biomarker of vaccine response for which receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significant diagnostic performance with histological complete response was CD86 (area under the curve = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.53 to 0.88, P = .020). Patients with complete response had significantly lower CD86 expression (CD86-low) than patients with no complete response (P = .035). The complete response rates for CD86-low and CD86-high patients were 50% and 19%, respectively, and CD86-low patients had a significantly higher complete response rate (P = .047). Compared with all patients, the CD86-low group had a 1.5-fold increase in the complete response rate. Gene expression of CD86 and CTLA4 showed the strongest positive correlation with clinical outcomes in the incomplete response group (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low expression of CD86 in exfoliated cervical cells can be used as a pretreatment biomarker to predict histological complete response after IGMKK16E7 administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142287464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Niloufar Saririan, Dedipya Bhamidipati, Pranam Dey, Sonia Persaud, Nirjhar Chakraborty, Sara Tabatabai, Grace Gallagher, Niti U Trivedi, Aaron P Mitchell
{"title":"Trends in enforcement of National Comprehensive Cancer Network financial conflict of interest policy.","authors":"Niloufar Saririan, Dedipya Bhamidipati, Pranam Dey, Sonia Persaud, Nirjhar Chakraborty, Sara Tabatabai, Grace Gallagher, Niti U Trivedi, Aaron P Mitchell","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae120","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae120","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) financial conflict of interest (FCOI) policy sets dollar maximums for panelists, but violations may occur.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied NCCN Guidelines panelists for the 20 most prevalent cancers, 2013-2022. We included panelists with at least 1 full calendar year of service (\"current panelists\") and those who began service during the study period (\"new panelists\"); NCCN FCOI policy limits ($20 000 from any single company or $50 000 across all companies) apply to both groups. Industry payments were obtained from Open Payments and mapped manually via National Provider Identifier. We calculated industry payments received, excluding the same payment categories as does NCCN (research, meals, travel and lodging). We estimated whether panelists received payments exceeding NCCN limits (\"violation\"). As a proxy for whether panelists were subsequently disqualified as stipulated, we measured continued service for at least 1 full calendar year (\"retention\") subsequent to an estimated violation. We analyzed retention before and after 2016, due to increased scrutiny on NCCN FCOI in 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The annual proportion of current panelists with estimated violations ranged between 0.5% (2020) and 5.8% (2016). Among panelists who did vs did not have violations, retention was 83.6% vs 88.5% during 2014-2015 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.26 to 1.31) and 46.6% vs 89.4% during 2017-2020 (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.17). Among new panelists, 2.7% (5/185) had prior-year violations during 2014-2015, as did 5.5% (18/330) during 2017-2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each year, a small portion of panelists receive industry payments exceeding NCCN limits. Since 2016, the likelihood that such panelists will continue to serve has decreased substantially.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671141/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142728764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Erin M Bange, Camila Bernal, Kemi Bolutayo Gaffney, Jill Ackerman, David Kwong, Jithin Thomas, Bobby Daly
{"title":"The feasibility and acceptability of home phlebotomy for patients with cancer.","authors":"Erin M Bange, Camila Bernal, Kemi Bolutayo Gaffney, Jill Ackerman, David Kwong, Jithin Thomas, Bobby Daly","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae104","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Time toxicity is a considerable burden for oncology patients. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of integrating mobile phlebotomy into standard of care procedures. From September 26, 2022, through December 31, 2023, a total of 345 patients had 1464 home laboratory test collection visits completed. These mobile phlebotomy laboratory collection visits occurred in New York (68.6% of visits), New Jersey (29.9%), Connecticut (1.1%), and Pennsylvania (0.5%). Specimen quality for home laboratory test collection surpassed the Memorial Sloan Kettering Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine benchmarks. Acceptability was high, 173 patients were approached, and 149 responded (86% response rate); most respondents (147 of 149, 99%) would use the service again or recommend it to others. This study assessed the integration of mobile phlebotomy into standard of care management for the collection of routine cancer laboratory tests. Mobile phlebotomy results in high patient satisfaction with superior specimen quality, offering a valuable solution to oncology patients for improved efficiency and convenience.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547947/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142465722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sylvie D Lambert, Sara Soldera, Jordana Kazdan, Francesca Frati, Anita Slominska, Melina Boutin, Vanessa Samouelian, Caroline Letendre, Karine Bilodeau, Doris Howell, Karine Le Breton, Michel-Olivier Gratton
{"title":"Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) programs for monitoring symptoms among patients treated with immunotherapy: a scoping review.","authors":"Sylvie D Lambert, Sara Soldera, Jordana Kazdan, Francesca Frati, Anita Slominska, Melina Boutin, Vanessa Samouelian, Caroline Letendre, Karine Bilodeau, Doris Howell, Karine Le Breton, Michel-Olivier Gratton","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae102","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkae102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring toxicities among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is relatively recent. This scoping review aims to guide decision making in the development of PROMs programs for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four electronic databases were searched from inception to January 2024. Data on PROM programs for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (eg, PROMs used, frequency) were extracted. Two authors with established interrater reliability screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. A narrative synthesis identified patterns in the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 articles described 16 unique multicomponent, electronic PROM programs for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, mainly developed for remote monitoring of toxicities between appointments. Patients typically completed 18-26 items from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) or Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) weekly, with high adherence and satisfaction. Commonly monitored symptoms were diarrhea, fatigue, shortness of breath, cough, nausea, decreased appetite, rash, joint pain, pain, and mood. Other features of PROMs programs included clinician alerts, with some programs only flagging symptoms that had an impact on treatment. Some programs also or only sent alerts to patients to contact their clinicians and gave access to symptom management information. In terms of efficacy, the only consistent finding was an increase in quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this scoping review provide some indication as to which components of a PROM program are promising. However, as the evidence base for using PROMs among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors is growing, many questions remain, including which symptoms to monitor, using which PROM, and at what frequency. More trials are needed to answer these questions and to determine how best to implement PROMs among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660428/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142521870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}