Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies最新文献

Certain Issues of Innovations Affecting the Insurance Business in the Light of the GDPR and Hungarian Insurance Law 从GDPR和匈牙利保险法的角度看影响保险业务的某些创新问题

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.03

Mário Čertický

引用次数: 0

Remarks on the Contractual and Delictual Issues of Slaves in the Lex Baiuvariorum 论《奴隶法》中奴隶的契约和文化问题

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.06

T. Nótári

引用次数: 0

Audiovisual Media Regulation during the COVID-19 Pandemic - Measures Undertaken by the Romanian Authorities during the State of Emergency COVID-19大流行期间的视听媒体监管——罗马尼亚当局在紧急状态期间采取的措施

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.05

Zsolt Kokoly

引用次数: 0

Mongolian Investment Regulation and Arbitration 蒙古投资监管与仲裁

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.01

Ninjin Bataa

引用次数: 0

Status Report on the Regulation of Insolvency Law at an EU Level and Its Trends of Transformation and Development 欧盟破产法监管现状报告及其转型发展趋势

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.08

Noémi Suri

引用次数: 0

Should Surrogacy Be Legally Regulated in Romania? 罗马尼亚应该对代孕进行法律监管吗?

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.10

Szilárd Sztranyiczki, A. Colțea

引用次数: 0

Working Time and Work-Life Balance in Romania during the Pandemic Issues and Evolutions 大流行期间罗马尼亚的工作时间和工作与生活平衡问题及其演变

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.11

Magdolna Vallasek

引用次数: 0

Autonomous and Automated Vehicles in Germany and Hungary, with Special Attention to the Question of Civil Liability 德国和匈牙利的自动驾驶和自动驾驶汽车，特别关注民事责任问题

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.04

Béla Csitei

{"title":"Autonomous and Automated Vehicles in Germany and Hungary, with Special Attention to the Question of Civil Liability","authors":"Béla Csitei","doi":"10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.04","url":null,"abstract":"The most frequent questions associated with autonomous vehicles both in the world press and in legal literature are those that look for the answer as to who is responsible for the accidents caused by these machines. However, only a few such questions deal with the issue that all factums apply different definitions, and the terminology is the basis of applying the particular factum. So, among others, answering the question is inevitable as to whether the autonomous or automated vehicle can be considered a ‘vehicle’, or the human sitting in the car can be considered the ‘driver’. If we decide not to consider the autonomous vehicle to be a vehicle, and – ad absurdum – we create an independent, sui generis category of vehicles, then the legal factums regarding the definition of the vehicle will not be applicable to the factum concerning the history of autonomous vehicles; however, their applicability will surely be questioned. With regard to this, I focus in my study on how the German Road Traffic Act (Straßenverkehrsgesetz) accommodates more advanced automated vehicles, and after this I compare the Hungarian and German rules that are relevant in terms of civil liability if we study the vehicles in question.","PeriodicalId":135984,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129152249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Regulation of Work Breaks in Hungary with a European Perspective 从欧洲视角看匈牙利的工作休息监管

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.07

R. Román

{"title":"Regulation of Work Breaks in Hungary with a European Perspective","authors":"R. Román","doi":"10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.07","url":null,"abstract":"The basis for the review of the Hungarian and European rules of the rest break during the working day was the fact that there was a lawsuit to establish the illegitimacy of termination, in which I represented the plaintiff. The reason for the summary dismissal on the part of the employer was that the employee was playing cards while on a rest break during the working day. In his action, the plaintiff sought a declaration that his employer had unlawfully terminated his employment. By the judgment of the Court of First Instance, the action was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to bear the court costs. By the judgment of the Court of Law proceeding by the plaintiff’s appeal, the judgement was reversed, and it ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff severance pay as well as compensation. The defendant presented an application for review, which was not upheld. After completing the matters of fact, the Court of Appeal correctly stated that, at the time of the inspection, the plaintiff availed himself of a rest break during the working day, which was lawful; moreover, it was not disputed by the defendant. The Court of Appeal rightly concluded that the employer may prohibit the employee from playing cards during breaks in the workplace, but this must be communicated unequivocally to him, and this expectation must be consequently carried out. The Court of Appeal also rightly pointed out that in the case of explicit prohibition of some behaviours, employees must also be informed of the legal consequences, which are applicable in case of infringement of the rule. However, in the present case, this was not established, so that the lawsuit ended with the full recovery of a favourable judgment of the employee plaintiff at the Supreme Court of Justice.","PeriodicalId":135984,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117072834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in Contractual Relationships 人工智能在契约关系中的适用性

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-02 DOI: 10.47745/AUSLEG.2020.9.1.04

Á. Juhász

引用次数: 2