Autonomous and Automated Vehicles in Germany and Hungary, with Special Attention to the Question of Civil Liability

Béla Csitei
{"title":"Autonomous and Automated Vehicles in Germany and Hungary, with Special Attention to the Question of Civil Liability","authors":"Béla Csitei","doi":"10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most frequent questions associated with autonomous vehicles both in the world press and in legal literature are those that look for the answer as to who is responsible for the accidents caused by these machines. However, only a few such questions deal with the issue that all factums apply different definitions, and the terminology is the basis of applying the particular factum. So, among others, answering the question is inevitable as to whether the autonomous or automated vehicle can be considered a ‘vehicle’, or the human sitting in the car can be considered the ‘driver’. If we decide not to consider the autonomous vehicle to be a vehicle, and – ad absurdum – we create an independent, sui generis category of vehicles, then the legal factums regarding the definition of the vehicle will not be applicable to the factum concerning the history of autonomous vehicles; however, their applicability will surely be questioned. With regard to this, I focus in my study on how the German Road Traffic Act (Straßenverkehrsgesetz) accommodates more advanced automated vehicles, and after this I compare the Hungarian and German rules that are relevant in terms of civil liability if we study the vehicles in question.","PeriodicalId":135984,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most frequent questions associated with autonomous vehicles both in the world press and in legal literature are those that look for the answer as to who is responsible for the accidents caused by these machines. However, only a few such questions deal with the issue that all factums apply different definitions, and the terminology is the basis of applying the particular factum. So, among others, answering the question is inevitable as to whether the autonomous or automated vehicle can be considered a ‘vehicle’, or the human sitting in the car can be considered the ‘driver’. If we decide not to consider the autonomous vehicle to be a vehicle, and – ad absurdum – we create an independent, sui generis category of vehicles, then the legal factums regarding the definition of the vehicle will not be applicable to the factum concerning the history of autonomous vehicles; however, their applicability will surely be questioned. With regard to this, I focus in my study on how the German Road Traffic Act (Straßenverkehrsgesetz) accommodates more advanced automated vehicles, and after this I compare the Hungarian and German rules that are relevant in terms of civil liability if we study the vehicles in question.
德国和匈牙利的自动驾驶和自动驾驶汽车,特别关注民事责任问题
在世界媒体和法律文献中,与自动驾驶汽车相关的最常见的问题是那些寻找答案的问题,即谁应该为这些机器造成的事故负责。然而,只有少数这样的问题涉及所有因素适用不同定义的问题,术语是应用特定因素的基础。因此,在其他问题中,回答这个问题是不可避免的,即自动驾驶或自动驾驶汽车是否可以被视为“车辆”,或者坐在车里的人是否可以被视为“司机”。如果我们决定不认为自动驾驶汽车是一种汽车,而且——荒谬的是——我们创造了一个独立的、自成一类的汽车,那么关于汽车定义的法律因素将不适用于关于自动驾驶汽车历史的事实;然而,它们的适用性肯定会受到质疑。关于这一点,我的研究重点是德国道路交通法(Straßenverkehrsgesetz)如何适应更先进的自动驾驶汽车,在此之后,如果我们研究相关车辆,我将比较匈牙利和德国在民事责任方面的相关规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信